elliefant
Numpty
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2020
- Messages
- 1,296
- Reaction score
- 9,960
IMO, BM and his family hired the attorneys they did based mostly on the not guilty verdict rendered in the Tom Fallis case.
In their minds, that case and BM’s probably seem similar—a dead wife, a missing presumed dead wife, and husband accused.
But SUZANNE’s situation is far different than the Fallis case. So much more movement to track and trace in almost every aspect, making BM a whole ‘nother animal.
So to speak. IMO.
I read this article about their work on the Fallis case
Wrongly Accused: One Man's Tragic Journey Through the Colorado Legal System
It seemed to me that LE and the prosecutors did a poor job; I really hope they don’t do the same for this case - I don’t think they will, based on what we’ve seen of them so far - because this defence team will be on to it.
It was in a different area ie not the same LE and DA etc.
Interesting read, including a lot about the pros and cons of grand juries.