BBM:
Agree that the nephew was baiting LE by urging the public to ask the sheriff about the condition of the bike.
Amateurish move, frankly.
Definitely an antagonistic move toward LE, as well.
Family and LE don't appear to be singing off the same hymn sheet.
Here's where my brain is going with that ask-about-the-bike business:
Hypothetically, let's just consider one possible scenario.
For the sake of argument, let's say that there's been a staged scene here, with the goal being to convince LE that SM was either abducted during a bike ride or that she'd had some type of biking accident.
If someone has gone to the time, trouble and risk of staging an abduction or accident, then it stands to reason that evidentiary props, including the bike, have been artfully arranged and/or altered to try to make it appear most convincing.
That particular someone's expectation would be that LE would buy into this scenario and quickly put the information about the bike out to the public, i.e., "We found her bike in what appeared to be damaged condition," or "We found her bike with signs that she may have been injured," etc.
LE not reporting anything about the condition of the bike would definitely throw that someone for a loop.
They'd want LE to share the news of the found bike with the public, as a way of pointing the finger of blame away from them completely.
In a staged abduction scenario, the bike is intended to be found, with the goal of misleading LE and the public.
Classic attempt at misdirection.
When I heard BM's nephew's demand that the public "Ask the sheriff about the condition of the bike," my brain immediately translated those words into the following message:
"Look over there. Not here."
JMO.