In an earlier interview, Suzanne’s family told FOX21 CBI agents asked Barry to take a polygraph test on two separate occasions, and, each time, he turned them down.
“I’ve never been asked to do a polygraph,” Barry said. “There is nothing that I am hiding. I have given three – 30 hours of testimony to the FBI and the CBI. I’ve answered every question. Every single question.”
================================================================
Who should I believe between these two camps? Suzanne's family, who have been supportive of LE and who really have no reason to lie about what LE told them?
Or BM, who claims they never asked him to take one?
UMMM< I am going to believe the family. In every case like this that I have followed, where a spouse went missing, and the remaining spouse cannot be easily ruled out, they have been asked by detectives to take a polygraph. It is very common and I have heard investigators explain the benefits of asking them to do so.
Also, if he is so innocent, but they never asked him to take one, why not offer to do so?
===========================================================
Dan Corsentino, a private investigator in Pueblo, said it is possible those agencies did not ask Barry Morphew to take a polygraph. He also said it could be reasonable for an innocent person to deny the test.
“Investigators may offer a polygraph only to have a subject or the person of interest refuse it based on legal advice, knowing the polygraph is not admissible in a courtroom. So, therefore, what is the use of taking it,” Corsentino said.
==============================================================
I disagree with the above explanation by Dan C.
While it is 'possible' they didn't ask him, it is also unlikely. They asked Frazee and Watts and Leticia and Peterson and everyone else I can think of...
They interviewed him for 30 hours, by his own admission. So they are obviously very interested in him and are wanting to know if he is credible.
I agree that it is reasonable for an innocent person to deny the test. And if he had said that tonight, I would understand his decision. But saying NO, when the family is saying the opposite, is a problem for him, in my opinion.
I disagree that investigators do not bother with the tests because they are not admissible in court. I have seen detectives discuss the benefits of the process of taking the polygraph. Number one, they like to see what the suspect's reaction is.
They can assess that reaction and use it to gain more information. It can be very revealing, even if they refuse the test.
But if they agree to take it, even if it is not admissible, they can glean a lot of info from the questions that rattle them the most. And it does matter if a suspect fails miserably aqs opposed to them passing with flying colours.