I agree. LE knows what they are doing. What I don't understand is why people keeping trying to force an unconfirmed bike ride into their theories. Until LE confirms she was on a bike ride, I won't believe there ever was one. Is was planted by a potential POI to direct the investigation. If she was on a bike ride and her bike was found, LE would have confirmed it. There silence says everything I need to know at this point.
Respectfully,
I never forced bike into the theory. My method is to keep all options open, and work back...We are all confidant that LE HAS already done this w/ far more resources and experience. Most of us are quite aware of the need for LE to keep a tight lid on the investigation.
JMO Most of us have already formed a good theory, but our sleuthing more in that direction, risks violating TOS.
I have been quite clear that sleuthing here does not cause LE to change the focus of this investigation.
I merely suggested WE go back to the beginning and pursue the much lesser believable scenario of the random stranger abduction or stalker. This would be sort of a review for us, not critique of LE.
JMO It would also allow a discussion w/o risk of timeout. As far as I know LE has NOT corrected media reports, as to the bike involvement, so I can assume they have quietly taken the necessary steps to push it to the lowest level of investigation. So until they correct this, they may consider our searches here innocuous.
TO BE CLEAR...I am one of the most pro LE
members here!
If you have taken any of my posts to be critique of LE, you have misunderstood me!
Whatever the reason, (I am relatively new member, )WS has had a tight lid on this case, sleuthing is very restricted.
AND my wild theory is one of few, that has any hope for SM, and I will always pray for that.