Going by what we are hearing right now, Nancy Lanza was shot in the face. I also heard that the children were shot in the face. If true, I find this SO disturbing. Did AL want to see the expressions on his victim's faces just before he shot them? Did he enjoy watching someone's face explode? Or did he want to terrify the remaining children who had just watched him do this to a classmate? Very hard to think about.
I'm wondering if we'll hear more about the psychology of a murderer who shoots in the face. It seems very connected and personal. The opposite of shooting someone in the back, kwim?
I'd send my kids to school in a prison atmosphere eight hours a day if it made it any more likely that they would come home at the end of the day. I get what you're saying though. it's much more likely that one child would be targeted for an abduction than it would be that an entire school would be targeted for a massacre.
I don't disagree... I don't think... I don't know how I feel about that. But I do think security for schools was created to prevent abduction rather than to prevent mass murderers. I'm not sure most of our schools could have stopped him.
BBM This worries me. It appears that the school AL attended had concerns about him and wanted to address them. Possibly asking that he attend an alternative school or special needs school to deal with whatever issues he had. Mom may have quit because she was angry at the school system and may have made those feelings, mistakingly, known to AL.
MOO
It begs the question, what kind of behavioral trouble did he have back then? Everybody says he was a bright, good student so I presume it was not about serious learning difficulties.
It could be a completely valid objection to the IEP. I have a child who is profoundly gifted (Full Scale IQ between 152-160 on WISC-IV) who also has developmental delays. This is a very perplexing situation for schools and parents. (Before anyone suggests I just institutionalize said child now, let me add that my child is emotionally extremely balanced. We've done play therapy since we discovered the "discrepancy" so that she would always have someone to talk to about it.)
Anyway, I can't tell you how many times her IEP team has made suggestions that cater to her weaknesses at the cost of her gifts. Wanting to put her backwards, into remedial programs, when she's tops out most academic tests. Of course we have wonderful staff who discuss things with me, and we come to a happy agreement. A lot of people in this position aren't so lucky.
Additionally- a lot of kids who are in this situation feel stifled by the school system. I've wondered from the start if this unnamed nobody felt more intelligent and superior to most of the world, especially to teachers, feeling like the schools focus on the production of conformists at the cost of individuality and in his mind was somehow protesting that by "saving" kids from the beginning of the hamster wheel.
NOTHING to base this on, just a reflection of what I know about profoundly gifted students who also have delays, and IME most of them have some sort of societal "differences."