I can only remember 1-2 MSM "experts" saying that and 1 article proposing a method for reviewing the matter.
Every other article has made it clear that, based on nasal swabs, children not only get COVID but carry very high amounts of it in their noses. I've posted a series of articles here on why that is, but basically a child's immune system works very differently to an adult's - especially in the mucous membranes of the nose. Their noses have much more active immune systems and it looks as if many children fight it off before it gets to their lungs.
However, obviously, many kids do get severe symptoms and a small number of those will die.
But there was never a plurality of "experts" who thought children didn't get it (the CDC was pushed to take that one literature review and run with it to try and force schools into opening). IMO.
The most recent set of articles on kids and COVID are fascinating because they show that once COVID becomes widespread (asymptomatically) in primary grade children, soon it is in middle schools (about 2-3 weeks later) at the same positivity rate and then in high schools - and from there into the parent generations and grandparent generations. Since only some kids have older siblings, it would seem that once those older siblings get it (also asymptomatic or with few symptoms), they bring it to school.
In my hometown, we're seeing a massive number of teachers retiring (with golden handshakes), so now they're struggling to find enough new teachers to go into the classrooms (which they've inexplicably decided to open on Dec 7 - for just one week - then send the kids home to the parents for Christmas.
I do not think that will work out well for our community (which is back in the purple level in terms of state mandates and will have to apply for a variance to get those kids in the classroom). Only ⅓ of the parents intend to send their kids in, at this point. The rest are opting for further distance ed.