My first time posting on this forum; have mostly been reading and catching up with some threads. Reading this thread, I do have a thought. It seems that everyone is focused on KC including certain items so that it would appear that these were items Caylee had with her when she was with "Zanny". I'm specifically thinking about the book and the shoes.
The problem with this (in my mind) is that means anything else found with the body wouldn't be incriminating. For example, if KC mentioned these items so that when/if the body was found it would back up her story that Caylee had these items when she was with the nanny. Why would she then go and include potentially damning evidence (like a necklace with a cross, or some Winnie the Pooh bedding that she had subsequently replaced) with the body? Do you get my drift?
Another thought--it would be interesting if the "photo" that appears to be sticking out of the corner of that book has nothing to do with the Anthony family and is a pic of a Puerto Rican woman or something like that to further implicate a "Zanny" connection.
These comments are made regarding some of the earliest posts in this thread. As an aside, looking at the more recent posts regarding the crime scene photos, I "see" a lot of the pobjects folks mention, but only after someone has blown them up and gone to great lengths to point them out. However, I *do* clearly see the book, as well as the striped tiger that is near the book in most of the photos and saw them clearly before reading the threads.
Just a few thoughts...
Simon1
The problem with this (in my mind) is that means anything else found with the body wouldn't be incriminating. For example, if KC mentioned these items so that when/if the body was found it would back up her story that Caylee had these items when she was with the nanny. Why would she then go and include potentially damning evidence (like a necklace with a cross, or some Winnie the Pooh bedding that she had subsequently replaced) with the body? Do you get my drift?
Another thought--it would be interesting if the "photo" that appears to be sticking out of the corner of that book has nothing to do with the Anthony family and is a pic of a Puerto Rican woman or something like that to further implicate a "Zanny" connection.
These comments are made regarding some of the earliest posts in this thread. As an aside, looking at the more recent posts regarding the crime scene photos, I "see" a lot of the pobjects folks mention, but only after someone has blown them up and gone to great lengths to point them out. However, I *do* clearly see the book, as well as the striped tiger that is near the book in most of the photos and saw them clearly before reading the threads.
Just a few thoughts...
Simon1