Crystal S., Haleigh's mother #2

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
"Protecting your own," to the extent one would be willing even to sacrifice an innocent grandchild for a culpable child or one possibly withholding info, is a bit too familiar and not a quality to be admired. JMO
:parrot:
I agree. I do not admire such a person either! Crystal should NOT be doing this and neither should her family.
 
"Protecting your own," to the extent one would be willing even to sacrifice an innocent grandchild for a culpable child or one possibly withholding info, is a bit too familiar and not a quality to be admired. JMO
:parrot:

I swear I have seen shades of CA in TN.....protect at all costs. :snooty:
 
"Protecting your own," to the extent one would be willing even to sacrifice an innocent grandchild for a culpable child or one possibly withholding info, is a bit too familiar and not a quality to be admired. JMO
:parrot:


Kiki is one smart parrot.

And I too think that TN is in defense mode.
 
I think both mother's are in defense mode. TN and MG. I think any mother would be.
 
NO WAY! :hand:

Keep in mind SS, it seems for quite a few this is only the first case they have followed closely besides Caylee, so I think they're just bound to automatically make the comparison between the two.

There is no comparison with CA and TN, IMO.

Sorry for the OT, now back to the thread topic..
 
I also see both mothers in defense mode,but it would be more understandable if MG would show some emotion for Haleigh,instead of anger towards Ronald.Love is more powerful than hate.IMO
 
I also see both mothers in defense mode,but it would be more understandable if MG would show some emotion for Haleigh,instead of anger towards Ronald.Love is more powerful than hate.IMO

There is no love when an abusive person with drug problems loses your child while said child was left in the care of a 17 year old high school dropout with drug problems of her own.
 
Well,the main thing is she doesn't have the custody and his father who has custody didn't give his approval and would have said no way.I would never let any relative that put one of my children on national television without my permission and knowing I would not have given permission,to take them anywhere again without supervision.He should demand supervised visitations until this is solved.
I agree.
 
There is no love when an abusive person with drug problems loses your child while said child was left in the care of a 17 year old high school dropout with drug problems of her own.

Pirate you seem to know so much first hand knowledge in this case. Could you please share some proof.
 
Hmm. The other night Crystal said she had been with Ron from the time she was 14. Thats a very long time.I don't think they hate each other. i don't think ron wants Crystal to go jail for past child support. He probably doesn't even want the child support but can't stop it because its a court order.
If this is all staged And a big if....... do you think Crystal and Ron are in on it together? ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,+
 
Keep in mind SS, it seems for quite a few this is only the first case they have followed closely besides Caylee, so I think they're just bound to automatically make the comparison between the two.

There is no comparison with CA and TN, IMO.

Sorry for the OT, now back to the thread topic..
Actually my own life experiences with a similar situation lead me to feel this way. I think when we all listen, watch, and see with our own eyes everything that is presented to us, we use at least some of our own experiences in making our judgments. My feelings really have nothing to do with what I saw in the Anthony case.
 
Actually my own life experiences with a similar situation lead me to feel this way. I think when we all listen, watch, and see with our own eyes everything that is presented to us, we use at least some of our own experiences in making our judgments. My feelings really have nothing to do with what I saw in the Anthony case.

Well if you are saying that you also are seeing shades of CA in TN, then we will just to agree to disagree. There is clearly no comparison between the Ron and Casey or Cindy and Teresa. Getting closely involved with these cases tends to take alot of you emotionally, and I think it's easy for many to start blurring the lines, esp with the cases practically overlapping and this being new to so many.

It's just my observation, and I was pointing it out to SS to maybe help her see where some of the posters are coming from, that's all :blowkiss:
 
Well if you are saying that you also are seeing shades of CA in TN, then we will just to agree to disagree. There is clearly no comparison between the Ron and Casey or Cindy and Teresa. Getting closely involved with these cases tends to take alot of you emotionally, and I think it's easy for many to start blurring the lines, esp with the cases practically overlapping and this being new to so many.

It's just my observation, and I was pointing it out to SS to maybe help her see where some of the posters are coming from, that's all :blowkiss:

With all due respect, You do not know that this is "new" to us. Just because we joined WS in the last few months, no one has any idea what we do off this bored, or what we have or have not followed. I see what I see and I can have an opinion even if it differs with someone else's.

ITA that some need to leave their emotions out of this and have said so many times.......
 
With all due respect, You do not know that this is "new" to us. Just because we joined WS in the last few months, no one has any idea what we do off this bored, or what we have or have not followed. I see what I see and I can have an opinion even if it differs with someone else's.

ITA that some need to leave their emotions out of this and have said so many times.......

With all due respect, I never quoted your posts or directed my post to anybody but SS. As I stated, as a simple observation to help her maybe see where SOME of the posters are coming from. I never said to help her see where "tehcloser" is coming from. It was never to meant to offend anyone and I THOUGHT I cleared that up.
Every poster on here does not intentionally set out to offend other posters. It would be nice if people didn't assume they were being attacked all the time. I even pointed out the point of my post, so I do not know how I could have made myself more clear.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
103
Guests online
241
Total visitors
344

Forum statistics

Threads
609,571
Messages
18,255,724
Members
234,693
Latest member
Jarie_401
Back
Top