Are we going to get store cameras of them potentially buying lime, ponchos, tyvek suits, zip ties, etc? Why do we not get transaction data? I get they probably paid cash, but the store can just pull all the SKUs of interest for LE at check out and give them the cameras to investigate the times in which they were purchased. I work in supply chain management, and everything in a store is traceable if there is a SKU and a camera. This would prove conspiracy if they can tie Michelle to purchase through cameras.
Absolutely agree. I thought we would see more bombshells.
I think p did a great job laying out all of the proof that Jennifer was murdered by Fotis but I honestly think that p has to do a better job of explaining MT’s involvement, CLEARLY!
Meaning they have shown the evidence but I’d like to see a step-by-step layman’s guide if you will showing every piece of evidence as shared beautifully in court by the exhibits/testimonies but not tied together like it should be to prove each and every charge against MT with the vivid examples as it’s been much too choppy and hard-to-follow.
For example, put up her written in perfect English alibi script on a giant screen in big bold font and with a lighted pointer go line-by-line, starting with highlighting her perfectly written English, then with the evidence to prove each line and lie with evidence to prove it with photos, quotes, testimony, phone data etc. moving down the paper, line by line showing her video clips saying she answered Andreas’s call and what that means, saying it clearly means that she stayed at 4jc and went up to his office and answered a pre-planned call from Fotis’s friend Andreas from Greece to form an alibi for Fotis and state clearly that this shows that MT conspired and explain what that means! Show the phone records of her going up the stairs….
Show a video clip of her saying what Fotis was wearing that morning and then a clip of him riding a bike wearing a hoodie during that time etc.! So what I am saying is show that she lied with the proof….
Show charts and clips of her going to and from 80 ms and 4jc multiple times with the phone data and surveillance clips. Show the clip of what Pg said and Lauren. Explain the coffee spill as she explained the bloody seats of the Tacoma and how she said it didn’t smell like coffee and say it seems like she should know what coffee smells like as she loves Starbucks and show that clip!!!!
Show close-ups of her body language from arrest to court appearances to interviews and in Starbucks and how body language matters citing other cases…
On the big screen show the mop pic and bloodied paper towel bits and green and yellow sponge that they found in the trash and roll the tape of her saying she brought these items to
80 ms to clean. Show her in the car coffee her phone records of her in the car etc…..state clearly that she accompanied Fotis dumping the garbage and show the photos of what they collected and state that tbis was clearly tampering with evidence.
Then show receipts of their cleaning lady from years of cleaning to explain how MT never typically cleans (show the clip of her saying just that) so why that day?!!!
Show clips of all the descriptive English words and phrases she used in all of the interviews. You cannot watch all of these videos in full and claim she doesn’t understand English. Get people to testify how she understands just fine as js is going to say she doesn’t.
Show her phone data and pics of her car driving to the car wash and explain that they took the red Tacoma that Fotis used in the murder to the car wash and they had a plan for her to follow him there to get a full detail and that proves Michelle is tampering with evidence. She followed him and emphasize how that was planned. She knew by this time re Jennifer but didn’t find this concerning? Explain why to anyone this would be gravely concerning. They never washed PH’s car before after using it many times and play that clip from pg.
I could go on and on as I am frustrated that it’s all there but not presented clearly, in my opinion.
It looks like all FD which I know they have to prove the murder but the evidence is there against MT but in my opinion they have not clearly shown the jury how she was involved in everything and in lockstep with him from the beginning to end.
Perhaps they plan on doing that in closing but it best be tight as it’s all there but must be better conveyed as I’ve seen in other trials.
Moo
www.courant.com
