CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, deceased/not found, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #64

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
I think they needed to.

And now the record shows that two people, both charged with conspiracy to commit murder were together when the one call was answered precisely at the moment the third co-conspirator was at 69 Welles. Without his phone.

Powerful.
Yes! That is what I was trying to articulate - but you said it perfectly. That would be my answer to the missing driver - whoever it was is just another co-D.
 
Well then !!!
Michi needs another attorney !!!

LOL
It was classic. JS making sure to say it happened during his cross examination. Implication: it wasn't on my watch.

Meanwhile, AF is sitting beside him typing/scrolling on her phone.

AF, you have one job. And she's still not doing it!

Babysit your client, make sure she doesn't present poorly before the judge or jury....
 
Does anyone know why the contempt hearing can't be done after closing arguments (while the jury deliberates)? Seems like there must be a legality that will cost this poor jury more time.
What if deliberations are only an hour or two and the contempt hearing is still going on? (It probably will be longer, but you never know)
 
On contempt, it will be interesting to hear when and where she obtained the report, whether her counsel knew she had the report and what their response to her having a copy of the report was. I would think that the state's office has combed the trial footage to see if that document was up on more than one occasion. I would further think the state has begun an investigation to see if the document was shared with others. Attorney Rose might be coming in for the contempt hearing if the document came through a lawyer to FD to MT.....
 
They should be imo.

Full investigation and imo they should be charged if they were involved.

Both of these attys imo are complicit in the situation and should be investigated and held to account.

Moo and mad
Judge made that clear. IF there are findings... two fold.

Sentencing and sanctions is what I heard.

Possible sentencing for the defendant.
Sanctions for counsel.

I hope that he has findings and that he imposes stiff sanctions on both attorneys and that MT is remanded to jail immediately on contempt and can stay there until sentencing for conspiracy, tampering and hindering, when she's summarily convicted on all three.

Orange is the new beige.

MOO
 
Does anyone know why the contempt hearing can't be done after closing arguments (while the jury deliberates)? Seems like there must be a legality that will cost this poor jury more time.
This is how I heard it:

After closing arguments, the judge will hold the contempt hearing. He estimated a half day.

He will not impose sanctions at that time, if there are findings.

He will wait until the jury arrives at a verdict and then he will promptly supply sanctions, regardless of guilty/not guilty.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
101
Guests online
450
Total visitors
551

Forum statistics

Threads
608,250
Messages
18,236,828
Members
234,325
Latest member
davenotwayne
Back
Top