CarefullyTaught
Hope is the thing with feathers -
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2018
- Messages
- 233
- Reaction score
- 2,529
Re what Team FD/defense may suggest if they persist in trying to throw shade at EE to stir doubt re FD’s guilt for the probable homicide and possible conspiracy:
Fabricated spin might be that EE was dependent on FoRe employment for $ and/or (though we don’t know) immigration sponsorship or status or dream to startup EE’s own business FD was going to invest in.
FD makes it clear to EE divorce proceedings have gutted any venture capital FD might have to partner or angel invest to help EE’s dream business and/or that FD is going to have to “let EE go,” but it’s def nothing personal, just that once the divorce is finalized, JD will own half of FoRe, FD will owe child support and have to self fund, will likely have to file for bankruptcy.
Or, FD requested EE go to the 4JX house to pick up the clothing etc items bags for charity of the stuff JD told him two days before he was free to just dispose of however bc JD didn’t want those memories or that stuff and the kids would have outgrown it anyway.
But the story would go that either EE misunderstood which property he was supposed to be retrieving the items from or else wanted to double check with JD it was okay to throw away the bags of her and the kids’ stuff.
When JD saw FD’s truck pull up to the NC rental house just shortly after she dropped off the kids at school and got off the phone with her friend, JD flipped out and immediately was terrified bc she fears it was FD coming to the house after JD and unannounced. JD panicked and tried to flee through the garage. EE was confused bc he thought JD knew EE was swinging by to check with JD on the clothes. EE drove or backed into the garage as JD was coming out but she either tripped and fell and EE accidentally hit her with the car because she was on the garage floor or else he didn’t see her as he was backing into or out of the garage and so EE ran over her.
Panic ensured. We know that FD’s truck was driving around that day in NC but that FD wasn’t driving it; it’s possible EE was driving it and part of the scheme was intended to suggest EE was at the crime scene.
So in these scenarios it’s possible that Team FD/NP would imply EE’s motive was either (1) to remove a financial roadblock to EE’s continued employment with FoRe and/or FD’s financial ability to help EE launch or invest in a new business or help EE with financial troubles EE had; (2) nonexistent rather just accidental as a result of mistaken identity or location or task confusion or a “good deed going punished”; of (3) that MT put EE up to it either directly or indirectly as a kind of strangers on a train thing on in exchange for sex, promotion, or bc EE had a crush on MT and wanted to please her.
In the big misunderstanding and/or accidental theory, FD and/or MT and EE freak out realizing liklely implications and finger pointing, and may have knowingly assisted in clean up or evidence disposal after the fact.
Again, left field. Just brainstorming preposterous theories.
JMO/IMO/MOO
ETA changed the to they
if to re
and one to owe
Fabricated spin might be that EE was dependent on FoRe employment for $ and/or (though we don’t know) immigration sponsorship or status or dream to startup EE’s own business FD was going to invest in.
FD makes it clear to EE divorce proceedings have gutted any venture capital FD might have to partner or angel invest to help EE’s dream business and/or that FD is going to have to “let EE go,” but it’s def nothing personal, just that once the divorce is finalized, JD will own half of FoRe, FD will owe child support and have to self fund, will likely have to file for bankruptcy.
Or, FD requested EE go to the 4JX house to pick up the clothing etc items bags for charity of the stuff JD told him two days before he was free to just dispose of however bc JD didn’t want those memories or that stuff and the kids would have outgrown it anyway.
But the story would go that either EE misunderstood which property he was supposed to be retrieving the items from or else wanted to double check with JD it was okay to throw away the bags of her and the kids’ stuff.
When JD saw FD’s truck pull up to the NC rental house just shortly after she dropped off the kids at school and got off the phone with her friend, JD flipped out and immediately was terrified bc she fears it was FD coming to the house after JD and unannounced. JD panicked and tried to flee through the garage. EE was confused bc he thought JD knew EE was swinging by to check with JD on the clothes. EE drove or backed into the garage as JD was coming out but she either tripped and fell and EE accidentally hit her with the car because she was on the garage floor or else he didn’t see her as he was backing into or out of the garage and so EE ran over her.
Panic ensured. We know that FD’s truck was driving around that day in NC but that FD wasn’t driving it; it’s possible EE was driving it and part of the scheme was intended to suggest EE was at the crime scene.
So in these scenarios it’s possible that Team FD/NP would imply EE’s motive was either (1) to remove a financial roadblock to EE’s continued employment with FoRe and/or FD’s financial ability to help EE launch or invest in a new business or help EE with financial troubles EE had; (2) nonexistent rather just accidental as a result of mistaken identity or location or task confusion or a “good deed going punished”; of (3) that MT put EE up to it either directly or indirectly as a kind of strangers on a train thing on in exchange for sex, promotion, or bc EE had a crush on MT and wanted to please her.
In the big misunderstanding and/or accidental theory, FD and/or MT and EE freak out realizing liklely implications and finger pointing, and may have knowingly assisted in clean up or evidence disposal after the fact.
Again, left field. Just brainstorming preposterous theories.
JMO/IMO/MOO
ETA changed the to they
if to re
and one to owe
Last edited:
