CarefullyTaught
Hope is the thing with feathers -
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2018
- Messages
- 233
- Reaction score
- 2,529
I doubt the thought would have even crossed his mind. That was so long ago and I'm sure this guy has a lot more to think about than trying to come up with subtle symbolic references to a trial that occurred 25 years ago. Imo
Apologies if this has already been mentioned up or down thread. I’m behind in my reading.
IMO/MOO
Whether or not the glove was on FD’s dominant hand, I wonder if he’s been trying to alter his palm print/s or finger prints, if it’s further inflammation of poison ivy, if visible bruising or other marks related to the crime, injuries received in the crime and/or weapon handling or evidence destruction or disposal pre or post arrest, or other distinguishing or new marks have become visible; one which he’s trying to conceal or obscure.
Were the gloves full hand or fingerless?
Another possibility, maybe the glove was used in some way in connection with the crime/s, weapon/s, evidence movement or disposal, but it was previously missed or not accessible to LE. If true, wearing the glove post incident in plain view might further contaminate the item, complicate the chain of custody, and render it either helpful for the defense or at least of no use to the investigation or prosecution.
Also if true, let’s bet that the truck swap employee was at some point invited to use or try on the glove, as was MT, random underhoused persons, or others, for the purposes of assistance with creating potentially exculpatory evidence after the fact.
Or maybe he’s been angry and punching holes in people or walls that he doesn’t want wire photographers or case investigators to see. It’s important to FD’s ego and mask that he appear and feel powerful, nonplussed, self-controlled, alpha. “You can’t and won’t unravel me. I won’t allow it. I win.” is his interior monologue.
Just a theory IMO/MOO.