Silver Alert CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #26

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
What’s a Stingray Interceptor?

I hate doing Wikipedia, but I'm just lazy right now and this will give you an outline if others do not do more. In some cases we have seen here on the threads, police and law enforcement put out a "fake" portable cell tower, which captures anything going in or out. It requires a court order to do so. That way, they can do real-time interceptions of any phones which are nearby. Including burner phones of course.

Stingray phone tracker - Wikipedia

I believe they use those in the Patrick Frazee case, and I'm trying to remember and recall what other cases have used such. I can't remember right now.
 
The court order gave him supervised visitation IN NC on Wednesdays. He was not allowed to have them at his home. I imagine JD went out of her way to make these visits as easy and “normal” for the children as possible.. Having Dad part of their normal routine is often advised. She probable planned the bbq for their comfort. FD also stated he played basketball with the kids. It sounds like she arranged a nice evening and left to let them share it alone.

It was said that they had supervised visitation in NC on Weds, but I have not seen any specification that it was in her home, though, that is possible. They could have met at a park, or, if at her house, just in the yard with rules for him to "not go in the house," perhaps - I'm sure family court knows much more about this! Big question, IMO, and it's huge that he wasn't allowed to have them at his home, if that is in fact so.

ETA: not positive that he wasn't allowed to have the children at his home - just got that from previous poster, and have not seen that info myself.
 
Last edited:
I agree with your thought that her resting place holds some meaning. While being followed by RadarOnline after being released after spending 10 days stewing in prison, FD meaningfully, meticulously and "bizarrely" swept and inspected the front doorway of 61 Sturbridge Hill, the house that is presently listed for sale for $4mm. Smirking into the camera - why? Revenge accomplished? Body still in place, right under our noses? Perhaps in the very house that caused FORE's insolvency and brought down his real estate empire? After FIL passed, did FD have to scramble to borrow from hard money lenders, mafia types that will break FD's legs, to finish the back patio and put down the sod out front? FD has not taken this property off the market although he did remove the broker from 4 JX so he has got business on his mind. 4 JX is under foreclosure and, if not soon arrested for bail violations, then FD will have to move - but wouldn't moving into 61 Sturbridge Hill be the final act of self-implosion? Another open house today, Sunday September 22, 2019, just like the one held earlier this month, search "61 Sturbridge Hill, New Canaan" on realtor.com. Delusional, this listing, and that is an understatement. FD dropped a brick on this house, on New Canaan and the families who live there. I'm shocked and outraged that this farce is allowed to continue. Yet, the FBI may be behind the telescopic lens today. And freezing all incoming wires to FORE/FD accounts as ill-gotten gains from a criminal enterprise. MOO.

BBM - BUMPING THIS FOR LOCAL PEEPS: Open house today, Sunday September 22, 2019, just like the one held earlier this month, search "61 Sturbridge Hill, New Canaan" on realtor.com.
 
BBM - BUMPING THIS FOR LOCAL PEEPS: Open house today, Sunday September 22, 2019, just like the one held earlier this month, search "61 Sturbridge Hill, New Canaan" on realtor.com.

Ooooh, perhaps our locals will go to the open house today?

* envisions our members going through the backyard and Lawn as their primary interest in the property* :D
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20190922-093345_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20190922-093345_Chrome.jpg
    117.6 KB · Views: 15
My 2cents on this -don’t know if it varies state to state, IME as a retired healthcare provider and divorce court user:

To set up a ‘my chart’ type acct, a code is usually given to the patient after appt for them to log on and set up username and password. Even if FD had known her Dr, he couldn’t go on and create acct just so he could view her info. However, since we know JD was going to unknown appts that morning, as I said before, she may have been carrying a medical file with her. If FD nabbed it out of her car, and that code was on paperwork, then he could have very easily set up an acct for her.

On EOBs: they are ONLY mailed to titled insurance holder. Ie, if FD were carrying insurance for the family, he would get EOBs. Even in a divorce, this holds. But IIRC, FD was not carrying insurance for the family. Therefore, any EOBs for in’s JD had purchased would go directly to her. MOO

Edit: now that I’m thinking more about this, I wonder if LE has checked her medical online accounts to see when and from what device they were set up. Seems too obvious. They must have.....

BBM -Good thinking! This reminds me, when I log into my ABC account it ALWAYS says when I last visited the site, at the top of the webpage! It states "You were last online..." at the top of the webpage each time - worth checking!
 
Last edited:
IMOO, it is sad commentary when the psych report is referred to as favorable to FD just because it says he isn't a psychopath. I'm sure JD's reveals she was not a psychopath either.

A very low bar has certainly been set. Moo

Just want to clarify that we don't really know what the psych report said. If someone knows otherwise, please correct me, but it appears that the news reports about the part they tried to admit into criminal court may have been based upon FD's lawyer's comments "summarizing" the report, and not upon the ACTUAL report, and may well be very twisted - on top of and beyond the fact that the psych testing was never even completed, according to articles on it.

"Herman’s [the psychiatrist] conclusions were summarized in a sealed report dated April 24, according to a motion filed by attorney Rich Rochlin, who is representing Fotis Dulos in the divorce."

Hard to know who summarized the conclusions, but it's a moot point if 1) it was an incomplete report and 2) it was tossed by the judge anyway.
 
Last edited:
FD appearance in court isn't casual maintenance as NP would like all to believe. He's been ordered to appear due to violations -- 4 times in past month. Wouldn't it be great if Judge Balwie ordered FD back to jail for failure to comply-- like thousands of his fellow defendants do. Oh wait - he's special...:rolleyes:

Judge orders Fotis Dulos to appear in court for GPS monitoring issues

STAMFORD — The estranged husband of missing mother Jennifer Dulos has been ordered to appear in court Monday to address possible issues with his GPS monitoring system, the legal team for Fotis Dulos confirmed to Hearst Connecticut Media Wednesday night.

Judge John Balwie has scheduled a 2 p.m. hearing for Monday after probation officials raised concerns that Fotis Dulos was not properly recharging the batteries on his GPS monitoring system, his legal team said Wednesday. The problem has apparently happened four times in the past month.
4X too many....
 
On June 18, NP filed a motion to get FDs “stuff” back from LE: his vehicles and 2 phones and computers.
We know FD gave his iPhone X to NCPD, with the passcode no less. (Was this a rookie mistake? Did he think had cleaned it up enough to give them?)

What is that 2nd phone that LE has? Is that MTs phone and they were on the same plan in FDs name, so it technically belongs to FD? (I am sure that FD was reimbursing both of their phones as a business expense).
Or did FD have another phone with incriminating information on it? Is that why he voluntarily gave the iPhone X to LE right in the beginning, along with the passcode, but refused to cooperate in any other way? He did refuse to consent to a search of his phone and they had to get a search warrant.
Was phone #2 MTs, and they got a warrant for her to give it to them? Did they find phone #2 at 4JC during the search on May 31?
Just wondering about this 2nd phone NP is asking to have returned.
There was an early FD quote talking about the iPhone X that was something along the lines of I only gave them what I wanted or wanted them to see. Will have to track that quote back.

It might have been from Wallace interview. But I remember being struck at the time 'why say that?' as it speaks directly to having done something to the phone in a premeditated way IMO. Innocent people don't need to alter their phones IMO!

I am coming around to the idea that FD is not what I would call a 'tech saavy' perp. Nope. I can just see some alterations made to the phone directly and then having a perfect icloud backup of the phone prior to the alterations or some such screw up. Wonder if MT 'took care of' the tech issues at 4Jx? My guess is yes!

I am sure LE is all over the phone and whatever was done to it.

MOO
 
Do you think it’s outlandish to consider a pre1 scenario? From 8:05-10:25am -a theory that JD was killed, and her remains were moved and deposited during this time frame as well. I’m still weighing “risk” (of discovery) as a heavy decision factor. Things I flag as highest risk in disposing of her remains are the body being seen in a vehicle, and transferred from one vehicle to another. Every time I look at the proximity of the Tacoma and Suburban to the road at the park, I cant imagine thinking no one would observe my movements.
FD could easily have carried her into woods behind the house, or used the car mat to drag her. I am also still holding on to the thought that her resting place holds some meaning.
Am I missing some evidence that would negate this theory? I think the blood in both vehicles could be explained by transfer from FD, mat or cleaning items. The amount of time at 80 MS and noise at Sturbridge does push the idea that he still had her body with him, but he could have been cleaning, disposing of or destroying other evidence.
Just a muddled thought. MOO

I'm leaning towards #3 or #5 but your theory is interesting, too. What argues against it in my head though is I think he would have had to have a pre-dug spot & how would he have done that behind her house prior to the crime without being seen? Maybe more likely at Sturbridge property if he could have gotten there before EE (maybe that was why he asked EE if he saw/heard anything?). Like you, I also believe the final resting place he chose has meaning.
 
On June 18, NP filed a motion to get FDs “stuff” back from LE: his vehicles and 2 phones and computers.
We know FD gave his iPhone X to NCPD, with the passcode no less. (Was this a rookie mistake? Did he think had cleaned it up enough to give them?)

What is that 2nd phone that LE has? Is that MTs phone and they were on the same plan in FDs name, so it technically belongs to FD? (I am sure that FD was reimbursing both of their phones as a business expense).
Or did FD have another phone with incriminating information on it? Is that why he voluntarily gave the iPhone X to LE right in the beginning, along with the passcode, but refused to cooperate in any other way? He did refuse to consent to a search of his phone and they had to get a search warrant.
Was phone #2 MTs, and they got a warrant for her to give it to them? Did they find phone #2 at 4JC during the search on May 31?
Just wondering about this 2nd phone NP is asking to have returned.
We have been going in circles on the phone issue due to lack of clarity IMO in the AWs. I am not sure if we know whether FD has 2 phones personally or if one of the 2 phones mentioned in the AW is used by MT? Or, does FD have 2 phones and MT has one phone? Pattis in court refers to 2 phones for FD so I am assuming from that stmt that FD has 2 phones. But, I have to admit to then being confused on the issue still after reading the AWs.

MOO
 
It was said that they had supervised visitation in NC on Weds, but I have not seen any specification that it was in her home, though, that is possible. They could have met at a park, or, if at her house, just in the yard with rules for him to "not go in the house," perhaps - I'm sure family court knows much more about this! Big question, IMO, and it's huge that he wasn't allowed to have them at his home.
FD was allowed to have the children in Farmington on Saturday I believe but the visits were supervised and MT/daughter could not be present is how I recall the arrangement working.
 
FD was allowed to have the children in Farmington on Saturday I believe but the visits were supervised and MT/daughter could not be present is how I recall the arrangement working.

OK, thank you.

I added to my previous post to clarify the last part, per your info.

Per Chicago54's post (which I had quoted) I took for granted that it had been established that he wasn't allowed to have the children at his home.

ETA: According to the media, he was apparently allowed to see them every other weekend in addition to the Wednesdays and also would have seen them the very next day:
"Most recently he was spending time with them on Wednesdays and every other weekend and he was scheduled to see them on Memorial Day weekend, just one day after Jennifer was reported missing."
Blood found in New Canaan home, garage amid search for missing mom
 
Last edited:
Ooooh, perhaps our locals will go to the open house today?

* envisions our members going through the backyard and Lawn as their primary interest in the property* :D
Yes, the last time this open house was posted I wanted put the trailer on the back of the truck and pull up with a minidigger.png

which is a very impressive piece of equipment IMO and excavate the entire front yard and upper drive area which was not complete as of the missing date, the back cement patio and stone patio portion that extends out into the rear yard. This would put all our many questions to rest on Sturbridge.

Somehow though I thought NCPD might have an issue with that happening but that hasn't stopped me from wishing I could do it!

So many questions about Sturbridge!!!

MOO
 
The court order gave him supervised visitation IN NC on Wednesdays. He was not allowed to have them at his home. I imagine JD went out of her way to make these visits as easy and “normal” for the children as possible.. Having Dad part of their normal routine is often advised. She probable planned the bbq for their comfort. FD also stated he played basketball with the kids. It sounds like she arranged a nice evening and left to let them share it alone.

I could be wrong but I thought it was a special celebration that night - a naming day party or something like that which is important in Greek culture & that's why there were also other people there in addition to FD & children.
 
There was an early FD quote talking about the iPhone X that was something along the lines of I only gave them what I wanted or wanted them to see. Will have to track that quote back.

It might have been from Wallace interview. But I remember being struck at the time 'why say that?' as it speaks directly to having done something to the phone in a premeditated way IMO. Innocent people don't need to alter their phones IMO!

I am coming around to the idea that FD is not what I would call a 'tech saavy' perp. Nope. I can just see some alterations made to the phone directly and then having a perfect icloud backup of the phone prior to the alterations or some such screw up. Wonder if MT 'took care of' the tech issues at 4Jx? My guess is yes!

I am sure LE is all over the phone and whatever was done to it.

MOO

It may have been the Wallace interview, I do not remember that specifically being said, but I did watch it.

But one of the benefits of coming in late to a thread is reviewing all the videos of court. I recall one instance when it happened. That is what the defense attorney was saying during that approximately 18 minute court video? I think it was the latest one in July?. It was the one where he talked about getting the Suburban and Jeep Cherokee back.

During that court date, he talked about how that they didn't have a warrant, and in my notes I have written" we want the phone back that you stole" it was also the court date that he said he was ready for a trial next month, and wanted an August trial date so that must have been in July? Let me see if I can go back and post it, back in a second.

ETA, found it, but is not what you were wanting to see but what I was thinking of that they were saying they stole his phone. The statement about the phone Starts at 6 minutes, and poster was you @afitzy!

WFSB 3


Yeah, it doesn't have the quote that you wanted. Sorry
 
Last edited:
In re-reading one of the SA articles, I was reminded of the fact that FD/NP's speaking in public about Jennifer's mental health was harmful for the children - not that they care about that. Here, from GF's motion:

“Mrs. Farber is not going to publicly respond to to the defendant’s allegations about her in a substantive manner, other than to state that the defendant is making a distorted, self-serving reference to a private, health-related issue that was resolved many years ago, as the defendant is well aware,” the motion states. “His effort to not only publicly shame Mrs. Farber, but in essence shame any person that has appropriately addressed a mental health issue, sends a poor message to his children.

New Canaan mom Jennifer Dulos is missing: Here’s what we know
 
Was working on timeline and just wanted to put this article into thread to confirm that LE was at 4Jx at 9pm on 6/5/19 which was a Wednesday.
Jennifer Dulos case: Police conduct late-night search at estranged husband’s home

Quotes from article:
Police activity picked up late Wednesday night at the Farmington home of Jennifer Dulos’ estranged husband.

Police executed a search warrant at Fotis Dulos’ Jefferson Crossing home. The scene became active around 9 p.m. Wednesday with state police troopers and K-9 units.

A state police spokesman confirmed troopers were at the residence “assisting with the investigation” and referred questions to the New Canaan Police Department.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
198
Guests online
528
Total visitors
726

Forum statistics

Threads
608,116
Messages
18,234,927
Members
234,300
Latest member
lak1313
Back
Top