Silver Alert CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #29

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
10/14/19 133.00 FD files objection to disclosure
73060818_10218913719547551_8402675272024850432_n.jpg
74271963_10218913718307520_2123929398808674304_n.jpg
IT’S NEVER going to STOP. I can’t take it !
 
Thanks for the info. Couldn't open the post to find the motion, but it's not necessary--I'll rely on hearsay here. B/c motions in criminal cases apparently don't appear on the online docket, I was wondering how the forum was getting them. You answered my question. My thanks also to sds.
@pernickety, we have been getting them sometimes from Marissa Alter from Channel12. She posts them on her FB page. She has to either get them from the courthouse herself or send someone but she has been on top of the case from Day 1.
 
This morning, as I sweeping (surely not as well as FD sweeps), a thought occurred to me. The timeline. We basically have the self-driving red Tacoma on camera in NC around 7am and 10:30am, between which it's surmised that the "violent physical assault" occurred in Jennifer's garage. I think there is additional footage, from a neighbor's home security camera, of the red Tacoma leaving 4J at some point. Surely then that camera caught all of the comings and goings that day, right? Anyhow, there's this matter of what FD was doing over his loooooong lunch hour, with only MT's shaky "quick lunch" alibi. We know how far we can trust her word. Without alibi for the time frame, consider this: FD lies in wait. FD attacks. FD assumes he can accomplish his goal without bloodshed. He is wrong. He underestimates his greatness. He underestimates JENNIFER'S greatness. She fights back fiercely, telling her story in blood evidence, as damning as writing a name. At 10:30, FD leaves the house, in Jennifer's vehicle, with her body in back. He makes an exchange, driving with or without her back to 4J. With or without her, he RETURNS to NC to clean up his crime scene. That's where the missing hours were. Bloody crime scene. Major clean up detail. A two person job for sure. MOO.

I still want LE to dust the garage opener in Jennifer's vehicle for FD's fingerprint. I'm convinced he'd have removed whatever gear he was wearing when he commit the sickest crime of his life, gloves included. If he drove away from her house, with her body in the vehicle, the last thing he would have done was close the garage door behind him. Bare handed....

MOO MOO MOO
 
Last edited:
I love every hard-working Websleuth on this website who has condensed main stream media for me because I refuse to click on any more links with headlines that make a mockery of our justice system (tainting jury pool, violating gag order, telling outright lies about the victim, violating HIPAA, attorneys, reporters and bankers aiding and abetting a murderer(s) and hindering a murder investigation, not even grousing about ethical violations anymore...I'm talking about being an active Accomplice to murder, its coverup and money laundering of proceeds from fraudulent conveyances, mortgage fraud and all foreseeable crimes to "cash in", as part of a Conspiracy with the Principal in an active Criminal Enterprise, think Mafia and all the chain links leading directly to Principals FD and MT, who are accomplices and co-conspirators). Chain link or spoke of wheel conspiracy. The standard for accomplice liability for a banker who processes money laundering transactions is known or should have known, so that includes turning a blind eye to sketchy international wires for importing/exporting of old cars when your client's primary business is real estate development.

I refuse to read anything from HC and any DA tweet so thank you all for labeling the link on your posts so that I do not click on it. No more fake news. No bueno. Never again. MOO.

None of us can fall by the wayside. That’s exactly what FD & Company are trying to do. Pick us off, one by one.
Lean on any of us for support, Pandaknows. Or all of us. Strength in numbers. It’s always darkest before the dawn.
When flying in a V formation, the lead goose gets tired. Falls back, and another goose flies up to be the leader. The tired goose takes a break, rides aerodynamic currents to rest up bc the front flyer takes the brunt of the air flow. And so they take turns. Flying in a V formation. V is for victory.
 
Rereading looks like a long post. Hope it’s sequential.

If NP was a public defender here, I would think there would be paperwork to show the appointment. If not, certainly a bill presented by NP to the state to get paid. No state agency pays a bill without an invoice. Paper trail. Auditors would croak.
FD lying under oath about his finances doesn’t make the SOURCE of the funds criminal. It’s a crime, yes, but not linked to the money. So can’t get to it that way.
Lying about not knowing who is paying is crime, but not as to SOURCE of the funds. Is the funding itself legitimate. Is it income from olive oil produced in Greece? Or some other business? Tourism? Fishing? Transportation? Like Onassis? Again. Guess all we want, need evidence to show that the money was “earned” illegally.
Same with filing false mortgage liens. Crime. But doesn’t refer to the source as being illegal.
Basically, was the money earned by legal or illegal means? Like the $75000. That’s the closest I can get to illegally “earned.”
Then, does the transferring raise doubts to its illegal beginnings? Does Greek benefactor sending money to NY developer raise questions in NY developer’s mind as to the legal/illegal means the money was “earned?” If so, problem. If not, again not revealed. And how much due diligence is required by NY developer? And it just spirals out of control.
BUT receiving funds for payment of non legal representation expenses would seem to be fair game. To pay living expenses. Insurance. Credit card bills.

EDIT added: what if NP receiving all the funds and distributing to FD’s expenses directly as part of his retainer agreement with FD. Is that covered under attorney client privilege? Meh. Probably so. More hurdles. The bills have to be subpoenaed directly from the companies to see who’s paying what. And how it’s being paid.

No question, FD has this laid out to his advantage for at least the time being.
There should be bank transactions. It’s not too difficult to fly in with $100,000.00 a trip. Private airstrip. No customs. But flying in with the kind of money we’re talking about, is not one suitcase.
Again, so what? If I don’t report earning a $100,000 from a fishing expedition, fishing is legal. Unless I’m poaching. Tax evasion is a crime. Poaching is a crime. So the money earned from poaching undersized fish, crabs, lobsters, is illegal. And if passed along to FD, a crime. And his attorney or whoever is in the chain must reveal it. But with multiple layers of transfer, it becomes harder and harder to prove from illegal source.
IMHO, I’d send in informants to gather the info without assistance from the court system. Get the fact that it’s illegal first. Then figure out how to prove it’s illegal and get it into evidence. From there, it can be exposed for what it is, and how it came into the possession of the Greek benefactor. Don’t hold your breath. Everyone in the line of transfer will lie. And if it’s millions, as we suspect, there could be more dead fish in the sea.
There are easier ways to get FD for not paying the Farbers back for the money that was loaned to him. Get the judgment first. Foreclose all the properties. Sort out what’s left. Then squeeze the last of the blood out of the turnip. By attaching book and movie rights before FD sells them off to a legitimate book publisher and production company. If he hasn’t done that already.
Have to prove he sold to thwart creditors to get it back. Pretty easy at this point.
And the plot thickens. This would be a series of movies. A trilogy. Too much for one alone.
He did too much of the dirty work himself. That will be his undoing.
Blood on his hands, under his nails. On his clothes if on Albany Avenue. His DNA in JD Suburban. Or MT. Or any other players named so far.

Agreed @Midwestmom2019, multiple layering of proceeds from an original crime requires special know-how but Anti-Money Laundering forensic specialists work with the FBI, the IRS and all the banks. Thank goodness for plastic...it leaves an audit trail.

Back to my favorite topic, hindering a murder investigation. Atty Baby Divorce Shark whose name sounds like Pie who was the mule for transferring the Apple iPhone X to the NCPD when FD met with them in the lobby on May 25 for a meeting that lasted all of one second. Atty Baby Divorce Shark must have got some nice favor in return, perhaps getting his removal file sealed in the divorce, to repeat Hidden Rotten Criminal Attorney advice to FD on the other end of the cellphone, while in the presence of the NCPD, on how to hinder a police murder investigation. Fruit of the poisonous tree, yada, yada. Two more counts of hindering, if not outright conspiracy. Because Hidden Rotten Criminal Attorney must have known about the Albany Avenue Odyssey of Stupidity in advance of providing the poisoned Apple iPhone X advice and in advance of the police discovering the Odyssey through cellphone tower triangulation using a warrant to the cellphone company, or glancing through recent texts to MT before the screen locked (say 30-60 seconds of unlock time depending on the settings), not through Apple's cloud, which as all mobsters know, is encrypted. IMO. MOO.
 
Last edited:
None of us can fall by the wayside. That’s exactly what FD & Company are trying to do. Pick us off, one by one.
Lean on any of us for support, Pandaknows. Or all of us. Strength in numbers. It’s always darkest before the dawn.
When flying in a V formation, the lead goose gets tired. Falls back, and another goose flies up to be the leader. The tired goose takes a break, rides aerodynamic currents to rest up bc the front flyer takes the brunt of the air flow. And so they take turns. Flying in a V formation. V is for victory.
Hilarious
 
I kept thinking about the issue you raise regarding the possibility that the State of CT might be paying for FDufos counsel Atty P (who has no case IMO)! The larger issue you raise about Atty. P doing work for the State of CT or any municipality with no contract is equally important and I think it should be investigated.

The more I thought about this issue the more bothersome it became, especially if there is no contractual relationship between the State and Atty. P. Especially as you point out IF THERE IS NO ACTUAL FORMAL CONTRACT WITH THE STATE!

If Atty W isn't able to get to the bottom of this issue via the Civil Case I am trying to understand how such a relationship with the State could be ascertained?

Would Atty. Colangelo be aware that FDufos is being represented by the State?

Would Atty. Colangelo check to make sure that the proper paperwork is in place for Atty P with the State of CT if he is in effect functioning as a 'public defender' for FDufos.

Who would know whether Atty P has any contract such as you described with the State or is simply on some kind of honour system and not monitored or do the contracts have to be made available to the public?

I think there is a definite 'public interest' aspect to this entire question of Atty P and his relationship both the State of CT and FDufos.

Do you have any suggestions on how to pursue inquiry into this topic as in my experience the labyrinth of the CT Judiciary is both deep and wide!

MOO

A few months ago I made FOIA requests of the CT Chief Pub Defender’s office for NP’s first and last questionnaires and contracts re his services as SPD or assigned counsel. They delayed, purportedly looking for “exemptions.” I filed complaints with the FOIC, which were docketed and scheduled for hearings. Deborah Del Prete Sullivan, legal counsel for the CPD, then sent me a letter denying my requests, as “No such documents exist.” But she added, “Attorney Pattis has never had a contract with this agency for appointment as a special public defender or assigned counsel. However, Attorney Pattis was appointed to provide legal representation, off contract, for which he was paid by this agency. Between 2005 and 2016, Attorney Pattis was paid $70,726.30 to provide legal representation as either a special public defender or an assigned counsel in Connecticut state court proceedings.” I withdrew my complaints.

Go to below link, see forms, etc., as to how Other lawyers are expected to get these assignments.

Assigned Counsel

I’ve speculated why Dulos’ first attorney, Riccio, withdrew. Was it because he couldn’t count on being paid for his services? Also speculation—if NP had this special relationship with the CPD’s office, did he go to them and say he’d like to take Dulos’ case (publicity) and ask them to pay him in public funds as his assigned counsel, “off contract”? A past FOIA decision ruled invoices for assigned counsel that identified the defendant were exempt under the attorney-client privilege. But there was a FOIA complaint brought by a journalist, Anne Stevenson v. the CPD, where the FOIC decided invoices could be obtained through a certain administrative process, over the state’s objection that the client could be identified that way, too. Search FOIA CT for website, click on FOIC decisions, then search. Not long ago, CT-N.com tv showed a forum on habeas corpus at which the CPD was asked if a defendant (incarcerated) said they weren't happy with their assigned counsel, does the CPD assign them another one? She said, to my memory, that the CPD's office never assigns counsel--that it's the judge who does. That's the way it's supposed to go, per the statutes. MOO
 
IT’S NEVER going to STOP. I can’t take it !

This is why he (FD) does this; sooner or later, his opponent finally decides to give it up, because, as you say, it’s never going to stop. He wears out whoever is in the way of getting what he wants by filing motion after motion after motion after motion-and none of his lawyers ever seem to worry about getting paid, for making these multiple motions on his behalf. Some judge in Ct is going to have to grow a backbone and see if he or she can put an end to this. And FD needs to get charged with the murder that he committed to take some of the wind out of his sails. And MT has to go to jail for what she did: maybe then she will understand that the state is serious about the case against her boyfriend. I hope she gets in trouble while she is out on bond, so she can be put in jail, then maybe she can be turned against FD.
 
A few months ago I made FOIA requests of the CT Chief Pub Defender’s office for NP’s first and last questionnaires and contracts re his services as SPD or assigned counsel. They delayed, purportedly looking for “exemptions.” I filed complaints with the FOIC, which were docketed and scheduled for hearings. Deborah Del Prete Sullivan, legal counsel for the CPD, then sent me a letter denying my requests, as “No such documents exist.” But she added, “Attorney Pattis has never had a contract with this agency for appointment as a special public defender or assigned counsel. However, Attorney Pattis was appointed to provide legal representation, off contract, for which he was paid by this agency. Between 2005 and 2016, Attorney Pattis was paid $70,726.30 to provide legal representation as either a special public defender or an assigned counsel in Connecticut state court proceedings.” I withdrew my complaints.

Go to below link, see forms, etc., as to how Other lawyers are expected to get these assignments.

Assigned Counsel

I’ve speculated why Dulos’ first attorney, Riccio, withdrew. Was it because he couldn’t count on being paid for his services? Also speculation—if NP had this special relationship with the CPD’s office, did he go to them and say he’d like to take Dulos’ case (publicity) and ask them to pay him in public funds as his assigned counsel, “off contract”? A past FOIA decision ruled invoices for assigned counsel that identified the defendant were exempt under the attorney-client privilege. But there was a FOIA complaint brought by a journalist, Anne Stevenson v. the CPD, where the FOIC decided invoices could be obtained through a certain administrative process, over the state’s objection that the client could be identified that way, too. Search FOIA CT for website, click on FOIC decisions, then search. Not long ago, CT-N.com tv showed a forum on habeas corpus at which the CPD was asked if a defendant (incarcerated) said they weren't happy with their assigned counsel, does the CPD assign them another one? She said, to my memory, that the CPD's office never assigns counsel--that it's the judge who does. That's the way it's supposed to go, per the statutes. MOO
@pernickety, excellent work and information! So much to think about here I'm not sure where to start....

I'm not familiar with the ins/outs of this process as you are so I am sorry in advance for a basic question.

I thought the information in your prior post on this topic said that attys engaged by the State had to have signed contracts/questionnaire forms?

The State of CT seems to have told you that the work being done by Atty. P was done 'off contract'. Is this permissible under their own rules? Are these 'off contract' loosey goose engagements legal and can the terms of these engagements being done 'off contract' be subject to FOIA inquiries?

It seems that the CPD office didn't explain with the FOIA that you did whether or not Atty P is being paid by the ST of CT to defend FDufos presently. Would another FOIA with a specific request to a particular case have to be made to the CPD in order to figure this out?

Why would an 'exception' be made for Atty P to do this work for the State of CT?

The idea that the Judges supposedly bring in the 'public defender' seems like it could potentially be rife with conflicts of interest and favouritism etc. How many Judges would even want to be involved with this process of finding a 'public defender' for their case?

What is the CPD Office role? If they aren't assigning attys to cases do they do something else such as vet the atty's etc.?

Sorry in advance for basic questions. I will go off and read about CPD now as I'm curious about why it seems that they aren't following their own rules about atty. engagements. Maybe I just misunderstood what you said. IDK. Will try to get up to speed on this now as its very interesting and potentially might help the efforts of Atty Weinstein in the civil cases too, IDK.

MOO
 
A few months ago I made FOIA requests of the CT Chief Pub Defender’s office for NP’s first and last questionnaires and contracts re his services as SPD or assigned counsel. They delayed, purportedly looking for “exemptions.” I filed complaints with the FOIC, which were docketed and scheduled for hearings. Deborah Del Prete Sullivan, legal counsel for the CPD, then sent me a letter denying my requests, as “No such documents exist.” But she added, “Attorney Pattis has never had a contract with this agency for appointment as a special public defender or assigned counsel. However, Attorney Pattis was appointed to provide legal representation, off contract, for which he was paid by this agency. Between 2005 and 2016, Attorney Pattis was paid $70,726.30 to provide legal representation as either a special public defender or an assigned counsel in Connecticut state court proceedings.” I withdrew my complaints.

Go to below link, see forms, etc., as to how Other lawyers are expected to get these assignments.

Assigned Counsel

I’ve speculated why Dulos’ first attorney, Riccio, withdrew. Was it because he couldn’t count on being paid for his services? Also speculation—if NP had this special relationship with the CPD’s office, did he go to them and say he’d like to take Dulos’ case (publicity) and ask them to pay him in public funds as his assigned counsel, “off contract”? A past FOIA decision ruled invoices for assigned counsel that identified the defendant were exempt under the attorney-client privilege. But there was a FOIA complaint brought by a journalist, Anne Stevenson v. the CPD, where the FOIC decided invoices could be obtained through a certain administrative process, over the state’s objection that the client could be identified that way, too. Search FOIA CT for website, click on FOIC decisions, then search. Not long ago, CT-N.com tv showed a forum on habeas corpus at which the CPD was asked if a defendant (incarcerated) said they weren't happy with their assigned counsel, does the CPD assign them another one? She said, to my memory, that the CPD's office never assigns counsel--that it's the judge who does. That's the way it's supposed to go, per the statutes. MOO
Took a look and as expected there is a process of application, review by CPD and approval by CPD for attys that take on legal representation on behalf of State.

There are 2 very basic forms that attys must fill out and return to CPD in order to be considered for this work.

I guess based on what you learned, we are to believe that Atty P is doing work on behalf of the State of CT without the proper paperwork in place and without the necessary approval of the CPD.

I wonder why this is is the case and why CPD would not follow its own process and procedures?

What about the information on the forms might be 'problematic' for Atty P to put his 'John Hancock' on?

Why has no CT Judge thus far in the many years Atty P has been doing work on behalf of the State of CT not at least checked the paperwork out with CPD Office?

Anymore nothing in CT Judiciary would surprise me but the idea that 4 pieces of paper can't be completed and signed by Atty P has me scratching my head as to 'why'????

But I am curious if another FOIA request can be made specifically about Atty P/his firm and the FDufos representation in Criminal Case by Judge Blawie?

MOO

From State Of CT website: Assigned Counsel

Assigned Counsel
bd21315_.gif


SCALE11.gif


Assigned Counsel are private attorneys that enter written agreements to represent indigent clients in a variety of practice areas.

Assigned Counsel annual agreements are approved based upon the needs of the Office of Chief Public Defender. Information regarding openings are generally posted to the OCPD web page and in the CT Law Journal in November and December each year. All applications are reviewed by the Assigned Counsel Standing Committee for approval. This committee’s final recommendations are provided to the Chief Public Defender for final approval. Annual agreements are posted and accepted electronically prior to the commencement of the fiscal year which begins July 1.

The Assigned Counsel Unit can be reached at 860.509.6486
 
Last edited:
Jennifer Dulos’ family says it’s ‘absurd’ to think she saw doctor in July
Carrie Luft, a spokeswoman for Jennifer Dulos’ family and friends, responded Monday, saying the document Fotis Dulos received was automatically generated for a quarterly fee and does not indicate she received medical services in July.

“The insurance claim in question, dated July 7, 2019, is for an auto-billed quarterly fee with no connection to in-person services — the Anthem claims summary in Mr. Dulos’s possession lists this same charge every three months,” Luft said. “To allege that Jennifer obtained medical treatment in July is absurd. To allege that Jennifer — together with her family — orchestrated her own disappearance is baseless and cruel.
“Yet again, the allegations by Mr. Dulos’s attorney blame the victim and inflict pain on her family and loved ones,” Luft added
 
mtlinkedin.png

Looks like MT 'updated/changed/altered' her profile on LinkedIn for PatagoniaStyles - wonder why the location of her Company is listed as Colorado when she isn't allowed to leave the State of CT?

Is this a 'bona fide' operating company with any actual inventory? Have any rugs/hides been sold and to whom?

Its 'odd' that there is zero country of origin information about any of the merchandise allegedly being sold by this MT company available from public sources? Identical rugs coming from China and India sell for 1/2 of the posted prices of identical merchandise from PatagoniaStyles. Wonder why this might be the case?

Why is the selling method for this company a 'private' instagram account? Not sure how effective this is from a marketing perspective but my guess is that MT well knows this to be the case which is what makes it all the more 'odd'?

Or, is this merely a vehicle to facilitate money transfer amongst 'friends and family' and perhaps FD too?

All I have to say is #odd, #makesnosense, #watchyourwallet

MOO
 
Last edited:
Jennifer Dulos’ family says it’s ‘absurd’ to think she saw doctor in July
Carrie Luft, a spokeswoman for Jennifer Dulos’ family and friends, responded Monday, saying the document Fotis Dulos received was automatically generated for a quarterly fee and does not indicate she received medical services in July.

“The insurance claim in question, dated July 7, 2019, is for an auto-billed quarterly fee with no connection to in-person services — the Anthem claims summary in Mr. Dulos’s possession lists this same charge every three months,” Luft said. “To allege that Jennifer obtained medical treatment in July is absurd. To allege that Jennifer — together with her family — orchestrated her own disappearance is baseless and cruel.
“Yet again, the allegations by Mr. Dulos’s attorney blame the victim and inflict pain on her family and loved ones,” Luft added
Yay ! They got proof
 
Hilarious

I guess my sense of humor is missing today. What did I say that’s hilarious?
Yes. Sometimes my humor is cynical, twisted, and warped. I’ve been told innumerable times I’m pretty funny in person.
But I truly meant that if any of us begin to go off the deep end, we cannot be lemmings.
(which I just researched to make sure I identified the correct species. Seems as though it is a misconception as to mass suicide. Wiki is great.)

We must turn back to our focus. Justice for Jennifer.

I’ve tried to get going on a “Jennifer Alert” site. A “not for profit” corporation in her honor as a DV victim. Like Amber Alert. Or Senior Alert.
Not like I have all the extra time in the world. Jennifer Farber case hits a raw nerve with me. Many reasons. None important other than Domestic Violence (as opposed to stranger violence) MUST BE STOPPED. Eradicated completely. Change laws from the early “a man can beat his wife with a stick no bigger than his thumb,” to spousal rape and no drop policies. Thank you CT for implementing spousal/ domestic partner/close friend acquaintance rape.

I preached to my sons:

“1. Don’t ever take a bet and guzzle a fifth of alcohol.

“2. If you’ve had too much to drink, call me. I’ll come get you whatever time of day or night. Wherever you are at the moment. No questions asked. No sermon. I’ll come get you. My promise to you.

“3. AND WHEN A WOMAN SAYS NO, YOU STOP. NO MATTER WHAT SHE SAID, DID OR PROMISED BEFORE YOU TWO STARTED.
STOP.
Put your clothes back on, help her put her clothes back on and take her home. Do not leave her for someone else to hurt her bc she may not be able to protect herself.
Be the man you were born to be: your father’s and my son.

“With all my love, your mom.”

We, as a United Nation, must eradicate all domestic abuse/violence, whether physical, emotional or mental. Victim’s rights are as important as the rights of the accused.
That means the VICTIM should be given the best criminal defense lawyer to work with the victim, the prosecutor, the police and any victim’s advocacy groups. To protect the victim.

Novel concept, isn’t it? IMHO now is the time. Because Jennifer Farber is the reason this can move forward. Maybe slowly at first, but it’ll gather momentum.
Any feedback to the Jennifer Alert idea?
 
Looks like MT 'updated/changed/altered' her profile on LinkedIn - wonder why the location of her Company is listed as Colorado when she isn't allowed to leave the State of CT?
Because .. that’s where MT imagines she and her daughter are moving when she Beats the charges .

New school, ski team, she can rent a store front and sell her IKEA Quality rugs, new Ski Patrol boyfriend .

I bet Begue is already living in “their” Condo with their daughter and it’s all set up.
 
I guess my sense of humor is missing today. What did I say that’s hilarious?
Yes. Sometimes my humor is cynical, twisted, and warped. I’ve been told innumerable times I’m pretty funny in person.
But I truly meant that if any of us begin to go off the deep end, we cannot be lemmings.
(which I just researched to make sure I identified the correct species. Seems as though it is a misconception as to mass suicide. Wiki is great.)

We must turn back to our focus. Justice for Jennifer.

I’ve tried to get going on a “Jennifer Alert” site. A “not for profit” corporation in her honor as a DV victim. Like Amber Alert. Or Senior Alert.
Not like I have all the extra time in the world. Jennifer Farber case hits a raw nerve with me. Many reasons. None important other than Domestic Violence (as opposed to stranger violence) MUST BE STOPPED. Eradicated completely. Change laws from the early “a man can beat his wife with a stick no bigger than his thumb,” to spousal rape and no drop policies. Thank you CT for implementing spousal/ domestic partner/close friend acquaintance rape.

I preached to my sons:

“1. Don’t ever take a bet and guzzle a fifth of alcohol.

“2. If you’ve had too much to drink, call me. I’ll come get you whatever time of day or night. Wherever you are at the moment. No questions asked. No sermon. I’ll come get you. My promise to you.

“3. AND WHEN A WOMAN SAYS NO, YOU STOP. NO MATTER WHAT SHE SAID, DID OR PROMISED BEFORE YOU TWO STARTED.
STOP.
Put your clothes back on, help her put her clothes back on and take her home. Do not leave her for someone else to hurt her bc she may not be able to protect herself.
Be the man you were born to be: your father’s and my son.

“With all my love, your mom.”

We, as a United Nation, must eradicate all domestic abuse/violence, whether physical, emotional or mental. Victim’s rights are as important as the rights of the accused.
That means the VICTIM should be given the best criminal defense lawyer to work with the victim, the prosecutor, the police and any victim’s advocacy groups. To protect the victim.

Novel concept, isn’t it? IMHO now is the time. Because Jennifer Farber is the reason this can move forward. Maybe slowly at first, but it’ll gather momentum.
Any feedback to the Jennifer Alert idea?
1. Your analogy was funny .
2. FD picking
I guess my sense of humor is missing today. What did I say that’s hilarious?
Yes. Sometimes my humor is cynical, twisted, and warped. I’ve been told innumerable times I’m pretty funny in person.
But I truly meant that if any of us begin to go off the deep end, we cannot be lemmings.
(which I just researched to make sure I identified the correct species. Seems as though it is a misconception as to mass suicide. Wiki is great.)

We must turn back to our focus. Justice for Jennifer.

I’ve tried to get going on a “Jennifer Alert” site. A “not for profit” corporation in her honor as a DV victim. Like Amber Alert. Or Senior Alert.
Not like I have all the extra time in the world. Jennifer Farber case hits a raw nerve with me. Many reasons. None important other than Domestic Violence (as opposed to stranger violence) MUST BE STOPPED. Eradicated completely. Change laws from the early “a man can beat his wife with a stick no bigger than his thumb,” to spousal rape and no drop policies. Thank you CT for implementing spousal/ domestic partner/close friend acquaintance rape.

I preached to my sons:

“1. Don’t ever take a bet and guzzle a fifth of alcohol.

“2. If you’ve had too much to drink, call me. I’ll come get you whatever time of day or night. Wherever you are at the moment. No questions asked. No sermon. I’ll come get you. My promise to you.

“3. AND WHEN A WOMAN SAYS NO, YOU STOP. NO MATTER WHAT SHE SAID, DID OR PROMISED BEFORE YOU TWO STARTED.
STOP.
Put your clothes back on, help her put her clothes back on and take her home. Do not leave her for someone else to hurt her bc she may not be able to protect herself.
Be the man you were born to be: your father’s and my son.

“With all my love, your mom.”

We, as a United Nation, must eradicate all domestic abuse/violence, whether physical, emotional or mental. Victim’s rights are as important as the rights of the accused.
That means the VICTIM should be given the best criminal defense lawyer to work with the victim, the prosecutor, the police and any victim’s advocacy groups. To protect the victim.

Novel concept, isn’t it? IMHO now is the time. Because Jennifer Farber is the reason this can move forward. Maybe slowly at first, but it’ll gather momentum.
Any feedback to the Jennifer Alert idea?
The body of your post wasn’t hilarious, I merely laughed at your Goose analogy .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
156
Guests online
3,318
Total visitors
3,474

Forum statistics

Threads
602,588
Messages
18,143,249
Members
231,449
Latest member
fiasco331989
Back
Top