Outforjustice
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2019
- Messages
- 454
- Reaction score
- 5,365
IT’S NEVER going to STOP. I can’t take it !10/14/19 133.00 FD files objection to disclosure![]()
![]()
IT’S NEVER going to STOP. I can’t take it !10/14/19 133.00 FD files objection to disclosure![]()
![]()
@pernickety, we have been getting them sometimes from Marissa Alter from Channel12. She posts them on her FB page. She has to either get them from the courthouse herself or send someone but she has been on top of the case from Day 1.Thanks for the info. Couldn't open the post to find the motion, but it's not necessary--I'll rely on hearsay here. B/c motions in criminal cases apparently don't appear on the online docket, I was wondering how the forum was getting them. You answered my question. My thanks also to sds.
IT’S NEVER going to STOP. I can’t take it !
I love every hard-working Websleuth on this website who has condensed main stream media for me because I refuse to click on any more links with headlines that make a mockery of our justice system (tainting jury pool, violating gag order, telling outright lies about the victim, violating HIPAA, attorneys, reporters and bankers aiding and abetting a murderer(s) and hindering a murder investigation, not even grousing about ethical violations anymore...I'm talking about being an active Accomplice to murder, its coverup and money laundering of proceeds from fraudulent conveyances, mortgage fraud and all foreseeable crimes to "cash in", as part of a Conspiracy with the Principal in an active Criminal Enterprise, think Mafia and all the chain links leading directly to Principals FD and MT, who are accomplices and co-conspirators). Chain link or spoke of wheel conspiracy. The standard for accomplice liability for a banker who processes money laundering transactions is known or should have known, so that includes turning a blind eye to sketchy international wires for importing/exporting of old cars when your client's primary business is real estate development.
I refuse to read anything from HC and any DA tweet so thank you all for labeling the link on your posts so that I do not click on it. No more fake news. No bueno. Never again. MOO.
Rereading looks like a long post. Hope it’s sequential.
If NP was a public defender here, I would think there would be paperwork to show the appointment. If not, certainly a bill presented by NP to the state to get paid. No state agency pays a bill without an invoice. Paper trail. Auditors would croak.
FD lying under oath about his finances doesn’t make the SOURCE of the funds criminal. It’s a crime, yes, but not linked to the money. So can’t get to it that way.
Lying about not knowing who is paying is crime, but not as to SOURCE of the funds. Is the funding itself legitimate. Is it income from olive oil produced in Greece? Or some other business? Tourism? Fishing? Transportation? Like Onassis? Again. Guess all we want, need evidence to show that the money was “earned” illegally.
Same with filing false mortgage liens. Crime. But doesn’t refer to the source as being illegal.
Basically, was the money earned by legal or illegal means? Like the $75000. That’s the closest I can get to illegally “earned.”
Then, does the transferring raise doubts to its illegal beginnings? Does Greek benefactor sending money to NY developer raise questions in NY developer’s mind as to the legal/illegal means the money was “earned?” If so, problem. If not, again not revealed. And how much due diligence is required by NY developer? And it just spirals out of control.
BUT receiving funds for payment of non legal representation expenses would seem to be fair game. To pay living expenses. Insurance. Credit card bills.
EDIT added: what if NP receiving all the funds and distributing to FD’s expenses directly as part of his retainer agreement with FD. Is that covered under attorney client privilege? Meh. Probably so. More hurdles. The bills have to be subpoenaed directly from the companies to see who’s paying what. And how it’s being paid.
No question, FD has this laid out to his advantage for at least the time being.
There should be bank transactions. It’s not too difficult to fly in with $100,000.00 a trip. Private airstrip. No customs. But flying in with the kind of money we’re talking about, is not one suitcase.
Again, so what? If I don’t report earning a $100,000 from a fishing expedition, fishing is legal. Unless I’m poaching. Tax evasion is a crime. Poaching is a crime. So the money earned from poaching undersized fish, crabs, lobsters, is illegal. And if passed along to FD, a crime. And his attorney or whoever is in the chain must reveal it. But with multiple layers of transfer, it becomes harder and harder to prove from illegal source.
IMHO, I’d send in informants to gather the info without assistance from the court system. Get the fact that it’s illegal first. Then figure out how to prove it’s illegal and get it into evidence. From there, it can be exposed for what it is, and how it came into the possession of the Greek benefactor. Don’t hold your breath. Everyone in the line of transfer will lie. And if it’s millions, as we suspect, there could be more dead fish in the sea.
There are easier ways to get FD for not paying the Farbers back for the money that was loaned to him. Get the judgment first. Foreclose all the properties. Sort out what’s left. Then squeeze the last of the blood out of the turnip. By attaching book and movie rights before FD sells them off to a legitimate book publisher and production company. If he hasn’t done that already.
Have to prove he sold to thwart creditors to get it back. Pretty easy at this point.
And the plot thickens. This would be a series of movies. A trilogy. Too much for one alone.
He did too much of the dirty work himself. That will be his undoing.
Blood on his hands, under his nails. On his clothes if on Albany Avenue. His DNA in JD Suburban. Or MT. Or any other players named so far.
HilariousNone of us can fall by the wayside. That’s exactly what FD & Company are trying to do. Pick us off, one by one.
Lean on any of us for support, Pandaknows. Or all of us. Strength in numbers. It’s always darkest before the dawn.
When flying in a V formation, the lead goose gets tired. Falls back, and another goose flies up to be the leader. The tired goose takes a break, rides aerodynamic currents to rest up bc the front flyer takes the brunt of the air flow. And so they take turns. Flying in a V formation. V is for victory.
I kept thinking about the issue you raise regarding the possibility that the State of CT might be paying for FDufos counsel Atty P (who has no case IMO)! The larger issue you raise about Atty. P doing work for the State of CT or any municipality with no contract is equally important and I think it should be investigated.
The more I thought about this issue the more bothersome it became, especially if there is no contractual relationship between the State and Atty. P. Especially as you point out IF THERE IS NO ACTUAL FORMAL CONTRACT WITH THE STATE!
If Atty W isn't able to get to the bottom of this issue via the Civil Case I am trying to understand how such a relationship with the State could be ascertained?
Would Atty. Colangelo be aware that FDufos is being represented by the State?
Would Atty. Colangelo check to make sure that the proper paperwork is in place for Atty P with the State of CT if he is in effect functioning as a 'public defender' for FDufos.
Who would know whether Atty P has any contract such as you described with the State or is simply on some kind of honour system and not monitored or do the contracts have to be made available to the public?
I think there is a definite 'public interest' aspect to this entire question of Atty P and his relationship both the State of CT and FDufos.
Do you have any suggestions on how to pursue inquiry into this topic as in my experience the labyrinth of the CT Judiciary is both deep and wide!
MOO
IT’S NEVER going to STOP. I can’t take it !
@pernickety, excellent work and information! So much to think about here I'm not sure where to start....A few months ago I made FOIA requests of the CT Chief Pub Defender’s office for NP’s first and last questionnaires and contracts re his services as SPD or assigned counsel. They delayed, purportedly looking for “exemptions.” I filed complaints with the FOIC, which were docketed and scheduled for hearings. Deborah Del Prete Sullivan, legal counsel for the CPD, then sent me a letter denying my requests, as “No such documents exist.” But she added, “Attorney Pattis has never had a contract with this agency for appointment as a special public defender or assigned counsel. However, Attorney Pattis was appointed to provide legal representation, off contract, for which he was paid by this agency. Between 2005 and 2016, Attorney Pattis was paid $70,726.30 to provide legal representation as either a special public defender or an assigned counsel in Connecticut state court proceedings.” I withdrew my complaints.
Go to below link, see forms, etc., as to how Other lawyers are expected to get these assignments.
Assigned Counsel
I’ve speculated why Dulos’ first attorney, Riccio, withdrew. Was it because he couldn’t count on being paid for his services? Also speculation—if NP had this special relationship with the CPD’s office, did he go to them and say he’d like to take Dulos’ case (publicity) and ask them to pay him in public funds as his assigned counsel, “off contract”? A past FOIA decision ruled invoices for assigned counsel that identified the defendant were exempt under the attorney-client privilege. But there was a FOIA complaint brought by a journalist, Anne Stevenson v. the CPD, where the FOIC decided invoices could be obtained through a certain administrative process, over the state’s objection that the client could be identified that way, too. Search FOIA CT for website, click on FOIC decisions, then search. Not long ago, CT-N.com tv showed a forum on habeas corpus at which the CPD was asked if a defendant (incarcerated) said they weren't happy with their assigned counsel, does the CPD assign them another one? She said, to my memory, that the CPD's office never assigns counsel--that it's the judge who does. That's the way it's supposed to go, per the statutes. MOO
Took a look and as expected there is a process of application, review by CPD and approval by CPD for attys that take on legal representation on behalf of State.A few months ago I made FOIA requests of the CT Chief Pub Defender’s office for NP’s first and last questionnaires and contracts re his services as SPD or assigned counsel. They delayed, purportedly looking for “exemptions.” I filed complaints with the FOIC, which were docketed and scheduled for hearings. Deborah Del Prete Sullivan, legal counsel for the CPD, then sent me a letter denying my requests, as “No such documents exist.” But she added, “Attorney Pattis has never had a contract with this agency for appointment as a special public defender or assigned counsel. However, Attorney Pattis was appointed to provide legal representation, off contract, for which he was paid by this agency. Between 2005 and 2016, Attorney Pattis was paid $70,726.30 to provide legal representation as either a special public defender or an assigned counsel in Connecticut state court proceedings.” I withdrew my complaints.
Go to below link, see forms, etc., as to how Other lawyers are expected to get these assignments.
Assigned Counsel
I’ve speculated why Dulos’ first attorney, Riccio, withdrew. Was it because he couldn’t count on being paid for his services? Also speculation—if NP had this special relationship with the CPD’s office, did he go to them and say he’d like to take Dulos’ case (publicity) and ask them to pay him in public funds as his assigned counsel, “off contract”? A past FOIA decision ruled invoices for assigned counsel that identified the defendant were exempt under the attorney-client privilege. But there was a FOIA complaint brought by a journalist, Anne Stevenson v. the CPD, where the FOIC decided invoices could be obtained through a certain administrative process, over the state’s objection that the client could be identified that way, too. Search FOIA CT for website, click on FOIC decisions, then search. Not long ago, CT-N.com tv showed a forum on habeas corpus at which the CPD was asked if a defendant (incarcerated) said they weren't happy with their assigned counsel, does the CPD assign them another one? She said, to my memory, that the CPD's office never assigns counsel--that it's the judge who does. That's the way it's supposed to go, per the statutes. MOO
Yay ! They got proofJennifer Dulos’ family says it’s ‘absurd’ to think she saw doctor in July
Carrie Luft, a spokeswoman for Jennifer Dulos’ family and friends, responded Monday, saying the document Fotis Dulos received was automatically generated for a quarterly fee and does not indicate she received medical services in July.
“The insurance claim in question, dated July 7, 2019, is for an auto-billed quarterly fee with no connection to in-person services — the Anthem claims summary in Mr. Dulos’s possession lists this same charge every three months,” Luft said. “To allege that Jennifer obtained medical treatment in July is absurd. To allege that Jennifer — together with her family — orchestrated her own disappearance is baseless and cruel.
“Yet again, the allegations by Mr. Dulos’s attorney blame the victim and inflict pain on her family and loved ones,” Luft added
Hilarious
Because .. that’s where MT imagines she and her daughter are moving when she Beats the charges .Looks like MT 'updated/changed/altered' her profile on LinkedIn - wonder why the location of her Company is listed as Colorado when she isn't allowed to leave the State of CT?
1. Your analogy was funny .I guess my sense of humor is missing today. What did I say that’s hilarious?
Yes. Sometimes my humor is cynical, twisted, and warped. I’ve been told innumerable times I’m pretty funny in person.
But I truly meant that if any of us begin to go off the deep end, we cannot be lemmings.
(which I just researched to make sure I identified the correct species. Seems as though it is a misconception as to mass suicide. Wiki is great.)
We must turn back to our focus. Justice for Jennifer.
I’ve tried to get going on a “Jennifer Alert” site. A “not for profit” corporation in her honor as a DV victim. Like Amber Alert. Or Senior Alert.
Not like I have all the extra time in the world. Jennifer Farber case hits a raw nerve with me. Many reasons. None important other than Domestic Violence (as opposed to stranger violence) MUST BE STOPPED. Eradicated completely. Change laws from the early “a man can beat his wife with a stick no bigger than his thumb,” to spousal rape and no drop policies. Thank you CT for implementing spousal/ domestic partner/close friend acquaintance rape.
I preached to my sons:
“1. Don’t ever take a bet and guzzle a fifth of alcohol.
“2. If you’ve had too much to drink, call me. I’ll come get you whatever time of day or night. Wherever you are at the moment. No questions asked. No sermon. I’ll come get you. My promise to you.
“3. AND WHEN A WOMAN SAYS NO, YOU STOP. NO MATTER WHAT SHE SAID, DID OR PROMISED BEFORE YOU TWO STARTED.
STOP.
Put your clothes back on, help her put her clothes back on and take her home. Do not leave her for someone else to hurt her bc she may not be able to protect herself.
Be the man you were born to be: your father’s and my son.
“With all my love, your mom.”
We, as a United Nation, must eradicate all domestic abuse/violence, whether physical, emotional or mental. Victim’s rights are as important as the rights of the accused.
That means the VICTIM should be given the best criminal defense lawyer to work with the victim, the prosecutor, the police and any victim’s advocacy groups. To protect the victim.
Novel concept, isn’t it? IMHO now is the time. Because Jennifer Farber is the reason this can move forward. Maybe slowly at first, but it’ll gather momentum.
Any feedback to the Jennifer Alert idea?
The body of your post wasn’t hilarious, I merely laughed at your Goose analogy .I guess my sense of humor is missing today. What did I say that’s hilarious?
Yes. Sometimes my humor is cynical, twisted, and warped. I’ve been told innumerable times I’m pretty funny in person.
But I truly meant that if any of us begin to go off the deep end, we cannot be lemmings.
(which I just researched to make sure I identified the correct species. Seems as though it is a misconception as to mass suicide. Wiki is great.)
We must turn back to our focus. Justice for Jennifer.
I’ve tried to get going on a “Jennifer Alert” site. A “not for profit” corporation in her honor as a DV victim. Like Amber Alert. Or Senior Alert.
Not like I have all the extra time in the world. Jennifer Farber case hits a raw nerve with me. Many reasons. None important other than Domestic Violence (as opposed to stranger violence) MUST BE STOPPED. Eradicated completely. Change laws from the early “a man can beat his wife with a stick no bigger than his thumb,” to spousal rape and no drop policies. Thank you CT for implementing spousal/ domestic partner/close friend acquaintance rape.
I preached to my sons:
“1. Don’t ever take a bet and guzzle a fifth of alcohol.
“2. If you’ve had too much to drink, call me. I’ll come get you whatever time of day or night. Wherever you are at the moment. No questions asked. No sermon. I’ll come get you. My promise to you.
“3. AND WHEN A WOMAN SAYS NO, YOU STOP. NO MATTER WHAT SHE SAID, DID OR PROMISED BEFORE YOU TWO STARTED.
STOP.
Put your clothes back on, help her put her clothes back on and take her home. Do not leave her for someone else to hurt her bc she may not be able to protect herself.
Be the man you were born to be: your father’s and my son.
“With all my love, your mom.”
We, as a United Nation, must eradicate all domestic abuse/violence, whether physical, emotional or mental. Victim’s rights are as important as the rights of the accused.
That means the VICTIM should be given the best criminal defense lawyer to work with the victim, the prosecutor, the police and any victim’s advocacy groups. To protect the victim.
Novel concept, isn’t it? IMHO now is the time. Because Jennifer Farber is the reason this can move forward. Maybe slowly at first, but it’ll gather momentum.
Any feedback to the Jennifer Alert idea?
My post got cut off .1. Your analogy was funny .
2. FD picking
The body of your post wasn’t hilarious, I merely laughed at your Goose analogy .