I wonder if they ever communicated via text regarding the children and so he knew she would be coming back to her house.How did FD know JD would return to her house that nothing?
Gives me terrorbumps to think he was already there at her house, watching, when she took the children TO school.
I'm thinking FD knew their routines. Stalking. (It was fine for HIM to move in a mistress IMO, but he'd likely have LOVED to catch JD with a suitor so he could be personally outraged. Narcissists INVENTED the double standard.) Anyway.... I wonder if JD always took the children to school or if this was a fluke (no nanny, up anyway for her doctor appt, etc, etc. ) Could it be that FD was waiting for the nanny to leave so he could slide in? Found his plan buckled when ther was no nanny, only JD, so he waited to see if she'd return? Which also threw off his entire timeline?
I wonder if we'll learn about surveillance images of dry runs in prior days.
The depth of evil here is shocking.
MOO
MOO MOO
I wonder if they ever communicated via text regarding the children and so he knew she would be coming back to her house.How did FD know JD would return to her house that nothing?
Gives me terrorbumps to think he was already there at her house, watching, when she took the children TO school.
I'm thinking FD knew their routines. Stalking. (It was fine for HIM to move in a mistress IMO, but he'd likely have LOVED to catch JD with a suitor so he could be personally outraged. Narcissists INVENTED the double standard.) Anyway.... I wonder if JD always took the children to school or if this was a fluke (no nanny, up anyway for her doctor appt, etc, etc. ) Could it be that FD was waiting for the nanny to leave so he could slide in? Found his plan buckled when ther was no nanny, only JD, so he waited to see if she'd return? Which also threw off his entire timeline?
I wonder if we'll learn about surveillance images of dry runs in prior days.
The depth of evil here is shocking.
MOO
MOO MOO
I just wish he’d stay put and get used to his new digs, as he has to know the gig up.420K is a lot to pay and never get back all for the luxury of being out on bond for a year wearing an ankle bracelet. And 6M would be a lot for a friend to put up, even a rich one, without any roi. I certainly don't have that kind of friend. I wonder if he'll post.
I’m still puzzled as to why he removed and disposed of some of her clothing (bra, shirt) and perhaps those zip ties from her body that were found in the dumpsters, (if that proves to be the case) before getting rid of her body.
Why not just bury, sink, burn or dissolve everything in one place? I am sorry to be so graphic, but even if he did chop up her body to be put in the incinerator, why not put everything in there and not in those separate trash bags?
That just seems pretty logical to me. So I can’t help but think her clothing and those zip ties (if they were used to restrain her) must have somehow hindered the way he disposed of her. But how?
But the cleanup was apparently good enough to not tip off nanny too fast- there were odd things, but she rolled with them until Jennifer did not pick up the phone and she got very worried about those things in retrospect. She ate lunch with 4 kids. I could see one of my peanuts concluding "Mommy took the Suburban because someone got the RR all dirty!" at that age. So, perhaps not a forensically good cleanup job, but it had to be a decent job aesthetically.If they have evidence of her blood on the outside of the vehicles and it isn’t spatter I would think she struggled to get away or staggered from a blow - if he was on the bike what weapon would he easily carry ? Or did he grab a golf club or garden tool from her garage ? We know the clean up was not done well based on the first warrants - I’m curious about how much more they have ?
JMO
I suppose so, but why keep the bloody clothes separate to put in a trash dumpster? Why not just keep it with the body? You don’t want to spread evidence around, which is just what he did. :::::::scratching head:::::::Having never performed such an action, I presume it is easier to cut up a naked body. MOO
Perhaps his late mother gave him the bike. MOOTo him it was worth it. That’s the kind of guy he is apparently.
Yes and we don’t really know if she went into the garage - or do we?But the cleanup was apparently good enough to not tip off nanny too fast- there were odd things, but she rolled with them until Jennifer did not pick up the phone and she got very worried about those things in retrospect. She ate lunch with 4 kids. I could see one of my peanuts concluding "Mommy took the Suburban because someone got the RR all dirty!" at that age. So, perhaps not a forensically good cleanup job, but it had to be a decent job aesthetically.
I’m still puzzled as to why he removed and disposed of some of her clothing (bra, shirt) and perhaps those zip ties from her body that were found in the dumpsters, (if that proves to be the case) before getting rid of her body.
Why not just bury, sink, burn or dissolve everything in one place? I am sorry to be so graphic, but even if he did chop up her body to be put in the incinerator, why not put everything in there and not in those separate trash bags?
That just seems pretty logical to me. So I can’t help but think her clothing and those zip ties (if they were used to restrain her) must have somehow hindered the way he disposed of her. But how?
Thank you ! It’s been a long time coming IMOI changed the title from SILVER ALERT to DECEASED/NOT FOUND because of the recent murder charges.
Let me know if I am wrong and it should be changed back.
quote by @Megnut
Do we know that the bike is missing?
We do not. This tells me 1) finding it is not important to clench the case or 2) they did find
it and are not looking for it.
If it were important to find it, don't you think there would have been a public request?
We'll eventually find out where it is.
I'm still convinced Fd put her body in a temporary place for a few days til things quieted down, then went back and removed
her and put in a more permanent place.
Why do you think that?I think they found the bike in Hartford
Early reports suggested it was his childhood bike (post upthread)Perhaps his late mother gave him the bike. MOO
She did enter the garage, it's on page 29 of the AWYes and we don’t really know if she went into the garage - or do we?
JMO
Remember early on some sleuthers thought he may have dissolved her body using chemicals from the farrier (?) business ? I’m wondering if the banging heard Saturday morning at the other empty house will come into play - we discussed that for weeksExcellent question, disposing of these items away from the body makes little sense if the body is buried.
Lye is a strong alkali used to dissolve bodies which is comprises sodium hydroxide or potassium hydroxide. Stored in plastic.
Plastics won't dissolve in many acids, clothing not sure. Not sure what lye does to clothing, but I know weak sodium hydroxide doesn't touch clothing since I get it on my clothes in the lab.
Doesn't seem like he would use lye on his properties, since there would probably be evidence left of the lye usage.
When they were rummaging through the trash on Albany Avenue, detectives found a logo belonging to a vintage Mercier brand bicycle, the affidavit says.Why do you think that?
One of AW said she 'looked' in garage and noticed the 2 camping pillows were gone.Yes and we don’t really know if she went into the garage - or do we?
JMO
She did go in the garage at some point, maybe just entered from there?Yes and we don’t really know if she went into the garage - or do we?
JMO