afitzy
Former Member
- Joined
- May 12, 2019
- Messages
- 11,285
- Reaction score
- 126,557
@Alethea, the news today that the new defense atty will seek to possibly overturn/review / exclude from trial (language was vague depending on source) the prior testimony of MT with LE is concerning I think.I feel like defense attorneys are getting a bad rap here. Most defense attorneys are not compassionate about or concerned for their clients. They are there to get paid. The best ones care very much about serving as a counter-weight to state overreach and protecting our Constitutional rights. It's not about feeling bad for your client or believing your client is innocent. It's about trying to ensure the system stays fair for everyone.
We have a bad enough reputation without people thinking we, for free, post on message boards about how beautiful our murder defendant clients are.
MT met with LE accompanied by her atty 3 times (multi hour long meetings) that we are aware of and during this time she either didn't tell the truth or changed her story multiple times. When confronted with physical evidence such as a picture or CCTV she did generally answer the question truthfully but that really only happened when LE showed MT a picture of herself doing something (e.g., Albany Avenue pitching trash or at the ATM with Fd in Avon etc.). It is believed that at the second multi hour meeting with LE that either Atty Bowman or LE asked if MT wanted and interpreter and she said no (this same question was also asked at her first arraignment if I recall). Her responses to many questions IMO honestly didn't make sense either in english or spanish and so I've long wondered about her mental and emotional state. LE must have been disgusted too as it seems they ceased their meetings with MT and Atty Bowman.
My understanding that lying to LE is a punishable offence. Yet, we have seen no charges leveled for lying to LE against MT. Atty Bowman must have known at a certain point that MT wasn't telling the truth when LE came up with picture after picture to show that she wasn't telling the truth. Not sure why this was permitted to continue to happen but it did and 3 meetings like this seemed to have occurred.
MT has spoken english for years despite growing up in Venezuela and so I am baffled where this new defense attorney is going with this line of inquiry on the language issue? MT in her statements has demonstrated a keen understanding of nuance in English which seems way beyond the level of english that her attorney seemed to be talking about in his statement today. Further the questions asked by LE were easily grade 3 or 4 level english questions and MT is clearly beyond this level IMO.
Not sure what to think about this situation at all.
MOO