Still Missing CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #57

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
JS wants to separate two issues.

If FD were on trial, the State would not allow this into testimony.

The Defense wants the documents... here we go.....
The defense has the dubious psych reports. Judge Blawie gave them to him, said he could read them, but not refer to them. And anyway, he already had them, or at least the information contained within them. And…he just did it.
 
JS is representing that the State's example are family arguments, no violence. Typical of any divorce.

JS is raising JFd's attempt to get a restraining order and that's why those allegations were made and it was denied.

JS wants the rulings brought in then.

Did he just say there's no reason that, two years after something something, why would FD do away with his wife?

Oh boy, now JS is saying FD was the better parent, JFd was not in support of joint custody... and now he wants her medical records....

I can't keep up with him.

I think I'm lost in the reeds with him

JMOJMOJMO
 
Two dead people, both by the same hand, leaving the Dulos children parentless.

And JAS wants to equate JFD claims that she feared FD with FD's claims that she was not the better parent?
Schoenhorn is totally showing his ignorance on what domestic violence entails.
The D does not want to concede the blood in the garage, concede that Jennifer is deceased, or concede that Fotis is responisble for the murder.
He is in lala land.
JMO
 
Did he just say FD's guilt couldn't be transferred to someone else?

Isn't that the very root of conspiracy charges?
The root of conspiracy charges is that the participation of others provides a community that supports and enables criminal acts - thus the failure of multiple consciences which might have otherwise been a barrier to criminal acts, and providing more intelligence for planning and more cover than one criminal can provide for himself.

Conspiracy is WORSE than a single criminal committing the act alone.
 
Judge can understand the cut and thrust....

No jury present so...

Court will, as long as it doesn’t become unprofessional, allow both parties "to ride the wave of zeal"....

(Referring to the State saying the Defense's theory of the case seems to be that right before she disappeared, JD ran over a squirrel eating a cheeseburger in her garage. Defense objected.)
 
Last edited:
That was A LOT.

Poor Jennifer. She got steamrolled.

She must have been exhausted.

JMOJMOJMO
JF had no support in Family Court and Judge Heller is sadly still on the bench so far as I know and was never censored or reprimanded or fired.

Not only was JF exhausted but she was afraid and burning through money at an alarming rate. Yes she had means but how many wealthy people can pay upwards of $50,000 a month for legal fees for a sustained period of time for a divorce. FD also never paid a dime of child support for the duration of the divorce and the state did nothing to compel payment as it should have or put him in jail.
 
JF had no support in Family Court and Judge Heller is sadly still on the bench so far as I know and was never censored or reprimanded or fired.

Not only was JF exhausted but she was afraid and burning through money at an alarming rate. Yes she had means but how many wealthy people can pay upwards of $50,000 a month for legal fees for a sustained period of time for a divorce. FD also never paid a dime of child support for the duration of the divorce and the state did nothing to compel payment as it should have or put him in jail.
Yes-I keep hearing from people who are not as well informed as we are, that fD had to pay child support for 5 kids. He paid nothing! You know he wanted custody of those kids, so he could compel Jennifer to pay it, along with the medical insurance she already carried for the kids, as well as paying the mortgage and taxes on a house that Michelle Troconis and her daughter resided in.
 
Once again, the Judge says that the jurors were carefully chosen and he trusts that they are capable, essentially, of discernment.

Judge just shot down defense's assertion that this Court would have to relitigate the dissolution of the marriage. He says this assertion has no merit.

Prior bad acts can be allowed. They cannot be unfairly prejudicial ...

Sounds like he WILL allow focused declarations made by JFd, not everything she said, but certain things that go to fear, anger, terror....

The court will be keen to entertain objections.

He is going to allow the marital discord.

Not for probative value but if it goes toward her state of mind, fear, terror, and motive in this case.

Collective win for the State. And IMO the memory of JFd.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
89
Guests online
2,969
Total visitors
3,058

Forum statistics

Threads
604,181
Messages
18,168,691
Members
232,116
Latest member
janeyd
Back
Top