Dan Rassier: Former POI **Wrongly accused**

[bucshunter]

Do you have something to show? Otherwise fold.

Do you or Sas? Fold em up boys

 

[human]

I was thinking about the child *advertiser censored*. Back in 89, computers were not usual in people's homes. Probably unlikely.

I imagine child *advertiser censored* came in paper form, VHS, and/or film.

When I worked at the University back in the early 80's, a prof of education was busted for child *advertiser censored*. Mailed from Scandinavia. Busted by the post office. He would get a super 8 projector from the library every Weds, I recall. I gave his name for Jacob even though he was really really short.

I wonder how hard it was to get child *advertiser censored* back then without getting busted?

 

[cGorg]

Do you or Sas? Fold em up boys

Already showed you some cards.....the vehicles described by the POI. What say you regarding these?

 

[Sasquatch321]

I would like to see Joy turn the tables on DR and genuinely ask him to confess.

 

[bucshunter]

I would like to see Joy turn the tables on DR and genuinely ask him to confess.

cant confess to something you didnt do Sas

 

[Sasquatch321]

How about we do Jacob a solid this Oct 22nd and hand over the evidence room to the public. It's been 26 years, the perp has already won for way too long. It's probably time to let us see the case and see what it leads to.

 

[human]

How about we do Jacob a solid this Oct 22nd and hand over the evidence room to the public. It's been 26 years, the perp has already won for way too long. It's probably time to let us see the case and see what it leads to.

I am sure we are all interested, but do you think that all of the different people over the years are incapable?

 

[Sasquatch321]

I am sure we are all interested, but do you think that all of the different people over the years are incapable?

Not at all, but what are we waiting for now? DR became a POI six years ago.

 

[human]

Not at all, but what are we waiting for now? DR became a POI six years ago.

Evidence that will lead to a conviction,

 

[Sasquatch321]

Evidence that will lead to a conviction,

So you're saying they are still testing. How about this Oct 22nd LE says "were still testing, have faith" I mean it could add some relief and confidence again.

 

[human]

I think they have evidence but not enough for a conviction.

For instance, if you read other cases on here it is interesting how much info LE has that they have kept to themselves.

It was interesting with Josh Powell who is suspected of killing his wife, If you recall, he went "camping" with his two little boys in the middle of winter.

He ended up years later killing them and himself so the info about him has come out.

LE had so much that I think most people are astounded that he did not get arrested.

But they had no body of the wife

 

[human]

Here is something that just popped up on WS

Portland police have arrested a suspect in the unsolved murders of three women and a teen girl, and they believe he could have more victims.

A Multnomah County grand jury indicted Homer Lee Jackson, 55, on 12 aggravated murder charges. He was booked into the Multnomah County Jail Friday.
Detectives in the Portland Police Bureau’s Cold Case Homicide Unit began re-examining these cases in 2004, then started working with forensic investigators about 18 months ago to identify physical evidence that could be tested with new technology.

Det. Jim Lawrence said some physical evidence, similarities in the crimes and some of the suspect’s history led them to Homer Jackson. Forensic evidence and other investigative information ties him to the murders, he said.

“Once we got that forensic link, we started to realize we were actually dealing with somebody that was probably committing several crimes that were very similar,” said Det. Lawrence. “Then we found clusters of crime.”
Murders of 4 Portland women in 1980s tied to man described by neighbors as unassuming, nice

 

[bucshunter]

There is zero evidence on dr

 

[human]

There is zero evidence on dr

That certainly could be as he is only a POI.

Do you know the info in the sealed warrants?

 

[bucshunter]

Nope do you?

 

[human]

Nope do you?

I was wondering because of the statements that DR is not involved. I am wondering if you have inside info as you are so certain

 

[bucshunter]

I was wondering because of the statements that DR is not involved. I am wondering if you have inside info as you are so certain

Nope do you or Sas? You seem quite certain as well

 

[human]

Certain he is a POI for good reason, What that means, who knows.

Sas can speak for himself, but he does not seem certain to me except he is certain someone did it. That's all I gather from Sas.

 

[bucshunter]

Certain he is a POI for good reason, What that means, who knows.

Sas can speak for himself, but he does not seem certain to me except he is certain someone did it. That's all I gather from Sas.

Oh Sas is certain that is for sure. You never answered humanDo you know the info in the sealed warrants?

do you know?

 

[bucshunter]

Human?