Bootsctr
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2012
- Messages
- 8,428
- Reaction score
- 292
IMO searching JW's man purse is a waste of time. There are more significant leads with this group of people than looking at cars that were not stolen. The crime is abduction and murder and DW has been charged with First degree murder while armed. He was with five other persons when he was arrested. There are more significant leads with this group of people than looking at cars that were not stolen. We can't discuss the people who were with him when he was arrested but there are a lot of eye openers if you follow the money. Who might have hard feelings for SS? Who is capable of theft, and prone to violence? The CNN special report tonight will shed significant light on this.
:yeahthat:
We've learned a lot since the start of the case.
A. We were told there was no sign of a break in.
"Lanier said there was no evidence to suggest random or forced entry into the Savopouloses home but asked anyone who had seen anything suspicious in the area to call police."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local...36d0aa-fb24-11e4-9ef4-1bb7ce3b3fb7_story.html
B. Then we learn there is evidence of a break in:
The documents also state that a window pane on a French door on the side of the house was broken and investigators also found a shoe or boot tread outside that door, which police say suggests someone broke into the house. The print doesnt match the boots issued to D.C. firefighters, who later arrived at the multi-million dollar house to extinguish a fire on the upper level. Investigators write that firefighters interviewed say they didnt use that door, court records say.
http://wtop.com/dc/2015/06/court-docs-show-forced-entry-stolen-phones-in-quadruple-d-c-homicide/
C. Wint fits the MO. Here's what the forensic pathologist on site at the Savopoulos' home said about the person who committed this crime:
Whenever we have any of these very tragic incidents, one of the first things we point to is mental illness, said Jay Singh, a forensic researcher and president and CEO of the Global Institute of Forensic Research.
He said there are five types of arsonists and they may be:
1. Suffering from mental illness
2. Experiencing a state of excitation
3. Looking to file a false insurance claim
4. Seeking revenge
5. Trying to conceal a crime scene
It seems, at least in this case, that either revenge or concealment would be the most likely subtypes, he said. It seems to be here though the individual has insight into what they were doing, was thinking relatively clearly and that it could be certainly, because there were no signs of forced entry, that this was someone who was either known to the family or had some way of being able to gain access to the home.
http://www.myfoxdc.com/story/29108580/investigation-continues-nw-dc-murders