James Bond
New Member
- Joined
- May 31, 2015
- Messages
- 67
- Reaction score
- 0
ITA with this logic. I'm just confused as to why they kept mentioning JW at all if this is the case, and more curiously, only using old information. With how much they tried to cast doubt on JW, I was mostly wondering if they had other information, why not use it then?
Thanks for your input... my understanding of all these different hearings is quite fuzzy.
Maybe the defense is posturing for some kind of plea bargain arrangement.