LE sometimes cant even keep track of their own knowledge and statements.
Youre right, theres so much we dont know.
But here is an example of testimony during the Preliminary Hearing where, per the transcript, Owens responses are confusing regarding where the manila envelope originated from.
PH transcript pages 33 and 34:
Defense Attorney Ago questioning.
Detective Owens answering.
Q Um, what W-1 then told the police in terms of a different version of events was that
he placed the money from the bag in the manila envelope -- into a manila envelope that he had in his car, correct?
A That was in -- repeat the question.
Q Yes. W-1 had the money in a bag with red lining, and moved that money into a manila envelope and
that manila envelope was something that he had taken from his own car?
A
That was my recollection, manila envelope was in the red sports car.
Q
Was in the red sports car?
A
Right.
Q Okay.Um, detective, do you still have Government's one up there?
A Yeah.
Q Could you look at paragraph 15 please at the bottom of page four? First sentence of that paragraph.
A Yes, first sentence.
Q Okay, do you see where at the end of that sentence it says that, um, that W-1 essentially placed the money in a red bag -- I'm sorry, strike that.W-1, when it arrived at Mr. Savopoulos's garage,
it placed the money inside a manila envelope that was in its car.
A Yes, you're correct.
Q
Okay. So the envelope was something that W-1 had in his own car, correct?
A
Yes.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/272950986/D-Wint-Savopoulos-Preliminary-Hearing