fred&edna
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2012
- Messages
- 11,002
- Reaction score
- 62,365
WOW!
'Round here we call that "within spittin distance"!
BBM
:gasp: A corporation threw employee under the bus by even mentioning something that even none of us :websleuther: had ever considered.
Jeez. Bad corporate pr department IMHO! They are highlighting something that did not need mentioning imho. smh
I looked and looked and couldn't find anything either. I graduated from law school 20 years ago (!!!) and practiced for about 8 years and haven't practiced in 12 years. I can google my maiden name and married name and find myself at my old firm, as a lawyer in every jurisdiction I was licensed in (some which have lapsed), as well as other stuff pertaining to my legal career. I know early on it was mentioned that SS was an attorney but I don't see any info on him like I can find on me. I remember reading here that he may have gone to Univ. of Maryland and/or American University but I have not seen that in any MSM or in my own searching.
I was able to find a sorority sister of AS on Facebook talking about the tragedy but that was it.
Whatttttttt? Holyshtballs I just read the release. Wtf. IS the Delivery person under investigation????
Sent from my not so humble opinion.
We are talking about another key player's father
I think his law "practice" was limited to just AIW. It's a family business. We have a close friend in D.C. who is a CEO of a tech company and he's never practiced law anywhere but in a corporation.
JMO
lmao... Are you talking to a fellow :websleuther: that I talked with today hehehehe :seeya: to someone I talked with earlier today... SEEEEEEEE!!!! I'm obtuse!
...anywhoooo...
My point was...why did the corporate PR release even MENTION that their employee was under investigation. They should have :moo: just stated their statement and left that out.
Why did they include that? It just feels dirty to me if I was an employee that this would be mentioned in the release. Nothing more to read into it. Just upset me as ... well..... history on good/bad press releases by companies with tragedies. This one just screamed to me a bad press release. My background, nothing more. Last thing that poor delivery person needs are folks misinterpreting (general public) that he is "under investigation". Poor kid imho
:blush: Emotions got in the way of my post
:seeya:
I think bucket was for the accelarant to set the car afire.
I read it like this: "everything else (that you want to know), including (the name of) the delivery person is part of an active investigation, so we can't tell you".
:thinking: Does this post give idea that someone puts gasoline in a 5 lb/10 lb pail vs. a normal container.
Not buying that at all. :moo:
What kind of accelerant like gasoline would be put in a bucket... or.... help me follow you as I cannot yet understand. That :moo: is foolhardy and just cannot fathom. Even to have it in a $9.00 approved gasoline container... then pour in a large open container to *throw* on the car indiscriminately doesn't make sense to me with my background...which isn't torching cars lol.
Can I pick your brain on what you are thinking?
TIA
I think his law "practice" was limited to just AIW. It's a family business. We have a close friend in D.C. who is a CEO of a tech company and he's never practiced law anywhere but in a corporation.
JMO
:thinking: Does this post give idea that someone puts gasoline in a 5 lb/10 lb pail vs. a normal container.
Not buying that at all. :moo:
What kind of accelerant like gasoline would be put in a bucket... or.... help me follow you as I cannot yet understand. That :moo: is foolhardy and just cannot fathom. Even to have it in a $9.00 approved gasoline container... then pour in a large open container to *throw* on the car indiscriminately doesn't make sense to me with my background...which isn't torching cars lol.
Can I pick your brain on what you are thinking?
TIA
I think bucket was for the accelarant to set the car afire.
He has not displayed much "thought" throughout the ordeal! I was thinking what purpose would one have to be running with a bucket? Some have said the $. Then I thought, the gas makes more sense (if you will) . He is in all baggy clothes , why not stick the money in your pockets - who needs a bucket to carry one and half inches of $100 bills!
YOur being logical - he certainly hasnt been , and it visually fits with splashing gas all over the mansion earlier........
I hope you didn't think I was "calling you out" or anything. You are wise (that does not imply old!! LOL!) and if you see something, I want to see it too! LOL!!
So your background is important. And your -and others - emotions are always valid! So thanks for pointing that out...