webhound
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2009
- Messages
- 118
- Reaction score
- 0
IMO mentioning the burial of the Anthony pets only helped the state.
1. The Anthony family buried their pets with respect. The parents would hardly take their treasured grandaughter and throw her into the woods.
2. ICA was in high school when some of pets were buried in the Anthony's yard and as a sociopath, mimicked the wrapping of her own daughter as you would a dog or cat. Sick beyond measure. I am now convinced that ICA intended to bury Caylee in the yard that day she borrowed the shovel.
3. Most importantly, the Anthony yard had buried dead pets in it and the cadaver dogs DID NOT hit on those spots. There was no dead animal in the trunk. There was a dead little girl!
Do you believe this helped the defense or the prosecution? Your thoughts.
--Mods, if this should not be a new thread or is improper in some way, please remove or move. Thank you.
1. The Anthony family buried their pets with respect. The parents would hardly take their treasured grandaughter and throw her into the woods.
2. ICA was in high school when some of pets were buried in the Anthony's yard and as a sociopath, mimicked the wrapping of her own daughter as you would a dog or cat. Sick beyond measure. I am now convinced that ICA intended to bury Caylee in the yard that day she borrowed the shovel.
3. Most importantly, the Anthony yard had buried dead pets in it and the cadaver dogs DID NOT hit on those spots. There was no dead animal in the trunk. There was a dead little girl!
Do you believe this helped the defense or the prosecution? Your thoughts.
--Mods, if this should not be a new thread or is improper in some way, please remove or move. Thank you.