Terri said this to the media:
http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2010/06/kyron_hormans_stepmom_terri_mo.html
so Terri says her mom had been there but her Dad arriving was the only "change" in the household. So, on or around the 28th Dad arrives and DDS starts staying there as well.
DDS, to PEOPLE, says she stayed there 11 days starting on the 28th which would put her leaving on or around the July 8th. (thursday)
four days later... who is staying with her to "protect" her now?
an affidavit is filed that she violated the restraining order
http://www.kptv.com/download/2010/0712/24229769.pdf
and four more days pass (8 days now without dds protecting her)
and she is to be in court on friday the 16th at 3pm to have a judge decide for her to move out of the home... they cancel the court date and agree between attys and she is back in Roseburg on Saturday morning the 17th at her parents house
http://www.katu.com/news/98633554.html
My question: if we are to believe DDS... that she was staying to "protect" Terri than who was there guarding her for that other week???
Oh yes... and than we have the KATU article:
http://www.katu.com/news/local/100942434.html
here is another snip I found interesting from this article as well:
which makes me also wonder why she gives her story to PEOPLE and not other local media outlets when PEOPLE has been reporting the same information (Terri Horman articles) that the rest have been reporting.
I am left :waitasec: scratching my head.