has anyone come up with a logical reason why DM would allow all the evidence to point directly to him?? makes not sense at all to me!! is THAT part of his "I was set up" , "why would I do that" ?
***ANYONE WHO EVEN SUGGESTS IN THE SLIGHTEST WAY THAT TIMOTHY BOSMA WAS INVOLVED IN WRONGDOING WILL GET AN INSTANT TIME OUT**
This goes for his family, friends, pets, doctors, ANYONE!
If you don't remember any other rule on Websleuths regarding this case, remember this one! And even if you don't read this post, you are responsible for it.
:tyou:
All these alternative theories have one thing in common. They basically come down to someone saying, "DM couldn't have done it because he's rich."
....
So please if you don't think DM is guilty, come up with something else other than he's rich.
I've so far been unable to find a single alternative explanation for this crime as presented here that springs from this concept. Would you kindly clarify please?
Well, I think you put forward at least one yourself.
For example there was the suggestion that DM paid for the truck in cash after a brief test drive and left his "helpers" to take care of the details. You suggested wealthy people are known for transactions involving large amounts of cash and this would not be out of the ordinary, I believe.
Didn't a lot of the early conspiracies tie into Millard Air and how someone high up was framing DM to get their hands on DM's money from the business?
The main issues I have with the alternative theories, though, is that the require such odd people to be in on it. Such as the guy who went on the first test drive. There were pages of debate about how he could be in on it.
It also spawns so much effort on things like days and days and days of trying to twist the info into DM not having been present at the abduction (even after he was arrested), via the debate of things like the box around his tattoo. I think some people still believe MS drew on a matching tattoo or something. It's my feeling that pages and pages of this in the main thread draw attention away from things people could more productively be thinking about--like who the heck was driving the chase truck?
It's my feeling that pages and pages of this in the main thread draw attention away from things people could more productively be thinking about--like who the heck was driving the chase truck?
Okay, gonna try this again (keep getting booted off when I click "preview post")... Anyways- does anyone know how long TB owned the truck ? (I have a theory, but not worth mentioning if he owned it from brand new).
IMO the biggest problem when exploring alternative theories is finding a way to skirt around further sleuthing of those who could, potentially, have played some role. It seems to me that this board has taken a very responsible stand in absolutely requiring that persons not named by LE and persons in any way associated with the victim are off bounds. However, this is a crime which is unusually ripe with sleuthing opportunity in areas ranging all the way from family politics to corporate opportunism to underworld vengeance. Therefore, it is difficult to consider the possible validity of alternative theories without also suggesting, or at least hinting at, who, within DM's circle of friends, family, known contacts, neighbors, clients, or associates could potentially have played a role. Again this, as it should be, is outside exploration within the venue of this website.
At the end of the day it may well be confirmed that this whole stupid tragedy was nothing more than some kind of drug induced nightmare carried out by a feral pack of pathological losers mindlessly led by a Charles Manson mini-me. Frankly, that theory is the most off-the-wall of them all, if you ask me, especially since it's mostly built on practically no confirmed information whatsoever and presumes the guilt of those presently in custody solely because they are charged.
IMO
By the way and still hooked on this valiant effort to try and come up with other scenarios which might explain some of the circumstances and/or the character of those we're told were involved I notice at the Dee Em page that one of his fav books was "The Last Lecture."
I have trouble imagining someone sitting about munching on dog bisquits and plotting horrific murders while reading this particular book. (Not to say it couldn't happen.) Does anyone know if DM's father had been recently diagnosed with serious illness?
You can give theory without naming names....
1. Given that we understand major contracts were in hand, or all but so, before the sudden death of WM, for the new MillardAir enterprise, including Boeing and other such major military and commercial contractors...