Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just because you don't like the way someone defended their client does not mean they did anything illegal. In fact they didn't. JSS did nothing to be disbarred over. It is not a whim but would have to be over something serious.
While people may not like this defense team, JA is entitled to a rigorous defense. They were trying to save her life and I know it is disgusting what happened but they followed the rules and worked out the disgusting plan and it was legal.
I have no problem with people not liking people for their tactics, but in the end everyone here had a job to do and did it.
JSS whether you like it or not made it so JA will not have any good appeals. She bent over backwards to make sure JA's rights were not compromised.
I'd be afraid to pray like that. Something about opening a doorway to hell.Yes, JA's mother made a post the evening before the verdict to the effect - I'm asking everyone to pray tonight like they've never prayed before. It only takes one juror to prevent the death penalty. We got this!
She's going to bring them all together in a kumbaya book club and teach everyone Spanish remember? So there will be no race or ethnic divide. They will all be one big happy bilingual group. Plus she'll help them to understand the importance of recycling, teach them to trace pictures and how to use two hands instead of one to get through the lonely nights. She's going to affect change and everyone will be so grateful that she came to their prison to spread sunshine and rainbows.
Well at least I think that's what was on the PowerPoint. It was so long ago. :dunno:
MOO
I will be ok with LWOP, but I'm still worried that she might get LWP. I pray that JSS doesn't give her this.
All these tweets are pathetic and as for the posts on that ridiculous innocent site calling the 11 jurors pedo huggers and mocking the Alexander family well they are just beyond disgusting. I'd love to out the people writing them to their family friends colleagues and neighbors. Put up their pictures along with their vile nonsense on every billboard everywhere along with the ejits who post in support of them. But they aren't worth the effort, they are so deluded they wouldn't care and the universe has a way of sorting these things out eventually.
I could play a prison guard. I'll practice my morose look of disgust for when she offers me hers 'favors' for an extra cookie on her dinner tray.
Too little too late. Some on that site are really mentally disturbed IMO. Anyone who would wish death on an 82 year old sheriff for doing his job *Sheriff Joe* has some serious issues. M.R.= :busted:
Don't guards get their own "stun gun"??!
I truly do wish I could accept this verdict and it not bother me, but I would be lying if I said I don't care about the results or how it came to be. The memory of it will always bring me back to a very sad and unjust day in our court system. Every time I see that happen it seems to stick with me forever.
All throughout this case I posted often about my fears that Travis' life and death would not be valued as much by this jury as many other jurors do when the victim is female and the defendant is a man. So, when I first heard they were hung, I wasn't surprised. That is what I expected. What I did not expect was a rogue juror. One juror who was able to tear the very fabric of our justice system to shreds with one vote. I will not lie, it hit me hard in the gut leaving me in tears and the memory of that injustice will forever remain.
There have been other dark days which have left indelible scars on our justice system beside JAs where justice was snatched away from the victims and I remember them all. I have always been a firm believer in justice for ALL. I hate when gender of either the offender or the victim is taken into account. It often changed the proper outcome whether the murderer was let off scott free or the punishment was incorrect based on the evidence entered including aggravators and mitigation.
But my faith was renewed when I found out that eleven out of the twelve wanted very badly to give death to JA.....not because they are vengeful people but they took all of the evidence and came to the only verdict that suited the crime that had been carried out against Travis.
And then there was one.
And that one made a mockery out the justice system. We as a society... should want any juror who commits perjury (if the investigations shows this to be true) to be punished. If the DA doesn't send a strong message to the community where jurors are picked from... that this behavior is unacceptable and will not be tolerated...... then they are opening the flood gates for more rogue jurors to get on high profile cases. If not the lone wolf will know even if they lie to get on the jury there will be no repercussions from it by the state attorney's office.
If she lied about anything I do want her to be prosecuted. No one should be above the law. If she lied she not only caused undue pain and suffering to the Alexander family, she also caused much pain to her fellow jurors and rendered an unjust vote devaluing Travis' life. We just cant allow for these kind of jurors to be on death penalty trials.
As far as my opinion personally, I don't take much comfort having to settle for less knowing she is just going to prison instead of death row. I doubt Travis's siblings do either.
If there ever was a case that warranted the death penalty it certainly was this case. The punishment of death should have been rendered because the evidence supported nothing else. IMO
I may give mine to Angela Simpson, with instructions.Don't guards get their own "stun gun"??!
I know the men's prison in Arizona is largely divided by race gangs black white mexican etc and most of the times each gang take care of themselves only mixing for certain "business" or to fight. Is this the case with the womens prison? I've heard that women prisoners divide into families but are they determined by race or is it something else. Just wondering how Jodi will fit herself into this.
I just looked and the list of juror names is STILL on that website. I tried to copy it so I could send it to JM or anyone who could use it, but it wont copy. Tried right click, it hilites, but it wont copy. Hopefully somebody already has it copied and can prove it came from that website.
I think JA will eventually team up with Marrissa DeVault and whatever "crew" she's put together from jail acquaintances who went there before her. I think JA has already been working that angle. No idea if Angela Simpson would be part of that or would be a rival.
MOO
No. They Have a key and a walkie talkie usually
Talk about abusive relationships! Fonseca would have a coronary, or an 'O'.From what I understand about Angela Simpson from an interview I saw with her.. She has no respect for liars. She expects the truth and she has no qualms about telling it exactly how it is. We all know cmja has a lot of trouble with the truth and refuses it all together. I'm guessing Angela and Jodi may not become friends.. Who knows though! They may end up getting married in there!
Jodi has to have been twittering from jail via MDLR, because if she had been doing it through anyone else, the tweeter could simply have been struck off JA's "phone call approved" list by Sheriff Joe. The jail authorities would soon have been able to find out who the tweeter is by simply listening to JA's phone calls. They can't, however, listen to the ones that involved the defense team and they can't prevent calls between JA and the DT. This might be why Sheriff Joe is having "legal" issues trying to get Jodi's twitter feed shut down.
Talk about abusive relationships! Fonseca would have coronary, or an 'O'.