Could have sworn she said more, hope she pops in.IIRC AZL said she gets one .... after that it's on her dime.
Could have sworn she said more, hope she pops in.IIRC AZL said she gets one .... after that it's on her dime.
This is JMO, but I think they did not know her previous married name to husband #1, therefore not putting two and two together. If they did, she would have been disqualified immediately.
Furthermore, she lied when she was asked if she knew anyone on the DT, PT. She obviously knew JM. I am just not sure how deeply they search into jurors past marriages and divorces to gain sufficient knowledge. Besides, I think JM would not have connected her previous married name to someone he convicted, as it is such a common name. I dunno, just my thoughts and opinion. :dunno:
the fact that she mentioned what she did about first husband...should have triggered a check...they can punch in a name and see past names just in a matter of seconds...if we know her maiden name first name and current name they should too ....
WOW! I would bet that this ends up as coming from MDLR..... she's not very intelligent, from what I've seen.
Where did you learn that?
If they did, and she said that she could keep an open mind, follow the instructions and deliberate in good faith, then nope.
ETA: Just going by Beth Karas' notes on her during jury selection, I think is it's crazy that Juan Martinez accepted her on the jury based on just the background that she gave them at that time. But he did.
Someone hypnotized her and programmed her to kill him. We need to find that evil hypnotizer!If Jodi Arias, in her perfect world (which will never happen) ever got a new trial, I wonder what NEW creative trial strategy she'd come up with. Let's see we've covered she wasn't there, the Ninjas did it, self defense, blame the victim, what's left? His roommate did it? Aliens? Santa Claus? Someone else who climbed in thru the doggie door?
That's not a basis for appeal, she had her opportunity to present that during the trial. Appeals are about errors that occurred in the trial, it's not a simple do-over. There has to have been a major mistake made by one the players, usually the state, to win an appeal. She can't just say, "Hey! I lost, I want another chance!" doesn't work that way.The website says "I was abused, and I fought back" .... she will waste another pile of state's money appealing on that basis......
AZlawyer, what can the Alexander family attach when Jodi loses her civil case? Can they attach the money that is put into the prison store? Can they attach her art work? It has shown to be of some value. Im sure she will find an angle where there is one.
Not the way I understand it. *IF* she were to be granted a new trial, the prosecution could seek no more than LWOP (which I assume the Judge will sentence her to).And if she gets a new trial she could end up on Death Row. What's a girl to do?
If Jodi Arias, in her perfect world (which will never happen) ever got a new trial, I wonder what NEW creative trial strategy she'd come up with. Let's see we've covered she wasn't there, the Ninjas did it, self defense, blame the victim, what's left? His roommate did it? Aliens? Santa Claus? Someone else who climbed in thru the doggie door?
If Jodi Arias, in her perfect world (which will never happen) ever got a new trial, I wonder what NEW creative trial strategy she'd come up with. Let's see we've covered she wasn't there, the Ninjas did it, self defense, blame the victim, what's left? His roommate did it? Aliens? Santa Claus? Someone else who climbed in thru the doggie door?
Another thing glaring at me is, how would her husband know she was the holdout? They were not supposed to talk about the trial? Obviously she came home each day & told him what was happening in deliberations! Esp. if 'she wasn't even home yet' & was already posting on his FB about shopping interviews 'for the right price'.Well regarding #17's info being released, since that "other" site obviously had the whole list(right down to their middle initials and even some of their webpages), then it stands to reason they also had #17's, perhaps they're the ones who released it to the media($$ talks)... how else would a tv camera have been able to show up at their doorstep so quickly for the one on one with the hb(heck the juror herself was allegedly not even home at the time), unless it's true that it was the hb himself that "outed" her?
http://www.kpho.com/story/28274746/juror-no-12s-husband-she-felt-like-she-was-being-assaulted
http://www.kpho.com/video?clipId=11208644&autostart=true
Hmm, I definitely heard the hb says his wife "held strong to her beliefs and he is proud of her for that"... only question is, what are her beliefs, he claims she believes in the DP but she couldn't even give one example to the other jurors what crime would be worthy of a DP if not this one? He also claims she looked at all of the reports and pics and how would he know that ... that's also not what the other jurors had complained about, in fact that was their problem, that she refused to look at all the evidence and only wanted to focus on JA's journals, maybe for tips on how to write her own.. since she too is a fan of the LoA and the movie the Secret.:/
BBM
"Value" is a word that implies worth. I'd prefer to say that her "artwork" (it pains me so much to call it that) attracts buyers of dubious ilk, which then translates to $$$ for JA. : )
IIRC AZL or one of the Attorneys on this site said he could have had her dismissed for cause, without using his strikes....
And a third alternate on this jury who also would have voted death was released the Monday prior to closing arguments.