I just followed you on Twitter, MeeBee. My Twitter name is not the same as my name here, but it indicates my former career.
Hey I don't see you in my notifications!
I just followed you on Twitter, MeeBee. My Twitter name is not the same as my name here, but it indicates my former career.
It was his instincts letting him know something was iffy and why, but he didn't quite pick up on it .. goddammit!!!!
Hey I don't see you in my notifications!
Well, if JSS consults her Judicial Assistant, I am sure she will give JA LWP.
I want to know from the first trial why Janet W. was taken off the case, then she was put back on the case and the others removed off [who does she have pull with??? HR?]. Per former juror Kelly.
Shady, after listening to JSS advocate for J138/17 to remain as a juror in such a subjective way, it does give me some concern for the first time that she could do that. But I have to believe she would not give this manipulative murderer LWP.
ETA: WTH happened here, I was quoting ShadyLady on her post about JSS possibly giving the murderer LWP
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ldfY-6HUyk
Still pretending there was NO premeditation..."I could not envision myself doing it".
Bu****it.
She envisioned it for weeks.
Shady, after listening to JSS advocate for J138/17 to remain as a juror in such a subjective way, it does give me some concern for the first time that she could do that. But I have to believe she would not give this manipulative murderer LWP.
ETA: WTH happened here, I was quoting ShadyLady on her post about JSS possibly giving the murderer LWP
I was snarking as usual....if JSS doesn't give JA LWOP, hell's gates will open...
Thanks. Will work on the court docs....
Hypothetically....say it turns out she lied 6x over during voir dire about her ex. The question would still be why. She obviously shouldn't have been on the jury, and she had better be charged with perjury.
But....why? I trust that JM saw what he saw and knew what he knew. He thought she had been a victim of DV and was still too emotional about it to be objective. From what's been said about deliberations, that sounds accurate to me. Stealth in that she lied to get on, but I don't think it was a vendetta against JM.
After Jodi Arias trial, AZ legislators look to restrict information
:gaah::gaah::gaah::shame::banghead:
WTF!? Did JSS really think through what she said there? Even though I already knew that this happened, watching to it and listening to it is utterly astonishing!
God bless you David Bodney, wherever you are.
Also keep in mind that I think her children are fairly young... Like I don't think any of them are even in High School yet...
I think she was with husband #1 almost until she met husband #2...
We need to see if we can find dates... I found pictures of her second wedding and I think the dates are with them...
By then it was too late. Really. JA would have won on appeal if 17 had been removed at that point.
IF she had been a victim of DV and she was crying or teary eyed about it in 2014, is it because her current husband is abusive? Surely, if her first husband was, it was so many years ago and supposedly she's been in a good, loving, supportive marriage might supplant those bad feelings? I know people feel things differently, but what happened in my past has thankfully been replaced by the here and now of good stuff. I mean the memory is there, but almost clinically because time has passed and good feelings replaced the sad ones. I dunno, something's not right. Maybe she was crying trying to NOT be chosen? Some people can turn on the waterworks - I had a coworker demonstrate for me once. It's incredibly manipulative. I'm not saying that's what she did, only that I find it odd.
Only my opinion of course.
I wrote cliff notes (and called them that) about jury deliberations, based on Jen-foreman interview. Is that what you're remembering?
Just watched Nurmi object & ask to approach and JSS actually said no.
Bonus - Nurmi objected because JM sarcastically asked Detective Flores if he has ever had sex with Nurmi (JM was trying to prove a point).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vhcSKTirgr8 57:08
IF she had been a victim of DV and she was crying or teary eyed about it in 2014, is it because her current husband is abusive? Surely, if her first husband was, it was so many years ago and supposedly she's been in a good, loving, supportive marriage might supplant those bad feelings? I know people feel things differently, but what happened in my past has thankfully been replaced by the here and now of good stuff. I mean the memory is there, but almost clinically because time has passed and good feelings replaced the sad ones. I dunno, something's not right. Maybe she was crying trying to NOT be chosen? Some people can turn on the waterworks - I had a coworker demonstrate for me once. It's incredibly manipulative. I'm not saying that's what she did, only that I find it odd.
Only my opinion of course.
Juan at sidebar trying to get rid of 138 for cause because she cried .. am I hearing this right? YEP listen: https://youtu.be/n7jqGuEniFA?t=26m11s