If we're talking about Duncan's family from the apartment, now in the gated community home, that is likely a very small /select group of people.Anyone who may have been exposed gets notified.
Right but does not include informing the public
Sorry I guess I'm missing the point.. Did he not need those things?
Guess the county or state of Texas will be picking up all this person's medical bills -- it should be a workers compensation claim since she was exposed on the job.
So... in my opinion, if the CDC warns health care professionals against doing procedures that generate aerosol droplets, which are defined as procedures that could cause the patient to cough (producing aerosol droplets)... There has to be some reason why they warn against promoting a patient to cough and release those aerosol droplets into the air - as in, they maybe are not sure if Ebola is in fact transmitted via aerosol. To me this means they don't want to take their chances so they must not really know, for sure, and won't gamble on it.
Ebola has been detected in blood and many body fluids. Body fluids include saliva, mucus, vomit, feces, sweat, tears, breast milk, urine, and semen.
http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/transmission/qas.html
"Hospital officials have said they are no longer accepting new patients at this time after a healthcare worker, who was caring for Ebola patient Thomas Eric Duncan, tested positive for the disease in preliminary tests"
Can't seem to find this in an actual article but written under photos of the hospital, like on this page:
http://www.boston.com/business/news/2014/10/12/state-health-officials-ebola-case-texas/LaaXUR0ff45swhEjjOi24O/story.html
They are pretty darn SURE the saliva and mucus from infected individuals contains the virus. So yes, when folks cough, sneeze, or sometimes just speak and throw off tiny bits of spit/mucous that can be contagious. Or likely when they touch their face or use the bathroom (without sanitizing their hands) and then handle the lettuce at the grocery store, or the gas pump as you are waiting to fill up, etc...
Anyone know if this lady was Asian? I have my reasons for asking.. My daughter went to a bar in Dallas Thursday night.. Needed a break from sitting in hospice with her father (Yea stupid move kids imo but maybe I'm just more paranoid ) they'd been holed up for two weeks and I understand that but? Anyway chatted with an Asian lady at the bar for a while until she told them she worked at Presbyterian hospital as a nurse. Then everyone pretty much got away from her.. And now this!
It was interesting that Duncan was the first patient in the US who was dialized and tubed. Wonder if any future ebola patient will get either of those.
I still think this may be a man, not a woman.
This case has far reaching ripple effects that aren't and won't be reported. I have a dear friend (a healthy, vibrant 82 year old) that is due to check into Presby at 4:30 in the am for a complicated surgery. Her surgery will involve three different surgery specialists that has taken months to schedule due to the number of surgeons involved. During the wait period, my friend has been physically uncomfortable and looking forward to her surgery date as the beginning of her recovery. I had lunch with her on Thursday and even though her immediate family is anxious they eventually summarized that there probably wasn't a safer hospital in Dallas at this point in time due to the eyes of the world watching Mr. Duncan's case. I wonder how this morning's news will change or not change her plans. I wonder what I would do.
Is this hospital even accepting new patients at this point? I know ER isn't accepting patients.
They are pretty darn SURE the saliva and mucus from infected individuals contains the virus. So yes, when folks cough, sneeze, or sometimes just speak and throw off tiny bits of spit/mucous that can be contagious. Or likely when they touch their face or use the bathroom (without sanitizing their hands) and then handle the lettuce at the grocery store, or the gas pump as you are waiting to fill up, etc...
SARS has been called the first global epidemic of the 21st century and has been the cause of a massive and varied public health response in many countries of the world. This report describes observations made by two authors on a journey from Manchester in the United Kingdom to Chiang Mai in Thailand during the peak of global transmission. The public response to SARS, particularly characterised by the wearing of face masks, seemed to outstrip official guidance. Though of uncertain protective benefit, the wearing of masks may have contributed to the awareness of the collective and personal responsibility in combating infectious disease. Active and empowered involvement of the general public in implementing and cooperating with public health control measures supported by national and international authorities has clearly helped to bring SARS under control. The public health significance of such potent symbols as the face mask may be considered in strategies to tackle other emerging infections.