And , if you think about it it makes sense. All viruses go for RNA/DNA. I would think that since they determine everything about the next human they make(!) that there is a lot of RNA/DNA in semen.
Althourgh media keeps wanting to make this different from HIV, IMO it is not - its just a different model. HIV has not gone airborne in decades, Ebola has been identifued since 76. That Malburg one has been around for ages - apparently it takes alot of transmissions for it to mutate.
HIV transmission is from contact wiht body fluids, so is this, IMO. And that too, makes sense, a virus cant thrive in "places" where DN/RNA are not - they love DNA?RNA its what keeps em going
IMO
Have no clue what this means just wanted to do the RNA/DNA connection:
chose two RNA targets that can bind to the same capture-strand DNA but have ...
[h=1]Recovery of Infectious Ebola Virus from Complementary DNA: RNA Editing of the GP Gene and Viral Cytotoxicity[/h]http://www.sciencemag.org/content/291/5510/1965.short