I've been having a hard time discerning what things have happened when in relation to things like did Amber fly the first time before or after Nina was diagnosed with ebola, and when did monitoring of various people start and so forth. So I've started putting together a timeline. And in the process, I've read some shocking things that I'm not sure if they've been brought to light.
When Duncan went to the hospital the second time -- in the ambulance -- he was very ill, lots of vomiting. Admitted with suspected ebola. Left to sit in the presence of many other people before finally being isolated. Okay, we know all that. Here's a couple things I didn't know:
The hospital did not immediately test him for ebola. They spent two days doing other tests first. They knew they had a possible ebola case, but didn't test for ebola right away? Really?
http://keranews.org/post/2nd-dallas-nurse-ebola-arrives-atlanta-treatment
http://news.yahoo.com/ebola-patient-thomas-eric-duncan-dies-at-dallas-hospital-201613535.html
http://www.dallasnews.com/news/metr...elay-may-have-violated-federal-guidelines.ece
During the two days from his admission on Sept 28 until the ebola confirmation on the 30th, healthcare workers at the hospital were not wearing any special PPE, just the standard gown gloves & mask. (WHAT????)
Only after the positive ebola test 2 days later did they start following the CDC's prior (inadequate) PPE guidelines.
http://thescoopblog.dallasnews.com/...r-two-days-while-treating-ebola-patient.html/
The HCW who treated him during those 2 days without PPE were either not being monitored at all or were considered low-risk. (I'm having trouble finding definitive info on whether they were being monitored.) That why they were free to go on cruises and get on places and fly around the country.
On Sept. 29, the hospital shipped Duncan's blood to the state lab in Austin for ebola testing. I can't find any info about how it was shipped or how it was handled in Austin or any monitoring of anyone in the Austin lab.
http://www.dallasnews.com/news/metr...elay-may-have-violated-federal-guidelines.ece
The Texas hospital has a machine that can be used to test for ebola and get results within an hour. They didn't use it because of stupid bureaucratic regulations. The machine is used by the military in Africa and has a better than 90% accuracy rate.
http://www.defenseone.com/threats/2...creening-machine-military-using-africa/96713/
When Amber was diagnosed with ebola, she was not one of the people being monitored for ebola, which included only people who had contact with Duncan prior to his hospitalization.
http://www.chron.com/news/houston-t...-hospital-worker-contracted-Ebola-5817785.php
The lab worker departed on the cruise ship on Oct 12 -- before being notified of required monitoring. So this lab worker who handled Duncan's lab samples wasn't even under monitoring until more than 3 days after Duncan died.
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/hospit...la-samples-caribbean-cruise/story?id=26263642
There is so much "too little too late" going on here that it boggles the mind. They took too long (IMO) to start contact tracing. They took too long to actually test him for ebola. They took too long to isolate him. They took too long to start wearing PPE, and when they finally did it was inadequate. They took too long to start monitoring HCWs who cared for him. They didn't monitor a lot of people they should have. Monitoring didn't involve much of anything beyond self-checking temp twice a day. They took too long to start requesting travel restrictions on people who are self-monitoring. IMO, they still haven't restricted travel sufficiently.
They consider "low-risk" a lot of people that I would have to consider to be "high-risk." It almost seems as if any HCWs who cared for him prior to his diagnosis weren't considered at any significant risk simply because he hadn't yet had a confirmed diagnosis. Just like they didn't wear PPE when he was admitted, but merely routine gloves/gown/mask from his admission until his diagnosis -- even though he was suspected to have ebola.
I don't think this could have been handled worse if they had been trying to.