Sure it does... all they have to say is that JB is a baffoon and didn't defend KC in the manner in which she was entitled to because he is ingnorant of the laws and was too busy getting camera time instead of concentrating on his client...
Actually no that is not a reason for incompetency -
To find a good criminal defense lawyer, we suggest that you ask the following questions: (do you think Casey or the A's asked these questions?)
Does your firm have attorneys who are highly experienced in the defense of criminal cases?
Does your firm have lawyers who limit their practice to criminal defense?
Does your firm make promises as to the results that they can obtain? Beware -- this is something ethical attorneys cannot do. Specific results cannot be accurately predicted.
Will your firm actually handle the case or will you simply sign me up and refer me to another criminal defense lawyer or firm?
Can your firm provide recent case results?
What Casey and the A's could do, and it has to do with the lawyer
Writ of Habeas Corpus
Many people who are found guilty after a jury trial feel that they were unfairly convicted. They often feel that their trial lawyer did not do a good job representing them. In some cases, a person who does not feel that he received adequate legal representation can be successful in winning a new trial.
The legal process that is followed in most of these situations is the bringing of a writ of habeas corpus. Usually a petition alleges that you received inadequate representation at your trial. One of the most common grounds cited by those who feel they were wrongfully convicted is that the lawyer was incompetent for failure to call certain witnesses to testify at trial.
In a recent case a defendant was found guilty after a jury trial for rape and related charges and was sentenced to 94 years in prison. He was found guilty in 1996. However, more than ten years after his conviction the court of appeals has recently reversed his conviction and has agreed with appellate counsel that his trial lawyer was incompetent.
In this recent case the court found that the trial lawyers representation was deficient in failing to call available, credible witnesses whose testimony could have supported (the defendants) alibi and impeached the testimony of the prosecuting witness. The appellate court called the defense lawyers representation inadequate and inept.
It is very likely that in the recent case where the defendant had his 94 year sentence reversed that many lawyers told him or his family that there was nothing that could be done. However, he found the right lawyer who fought for him and finally in 2007 won him a new trial.
So it's not just JB wants to be in front of the cameras