Interesting, given the circumstances of this woman's death, before and after. I agree with the poster above that the complaint appears to be written to address the substantial responsibility of the defendants whether Becky's death was EITHER suicide or murder.
I'm also curious as to the distinction of this suit being filed as a FEDERAL complaint. Perhaps this has to do with the harassment and stalking between 2 states, AZ and CA? Or because the plaintiff and named defendants all live in different states? Perhaps I'll ask this on the legal thread.
http://www.cbs8.com/story/22834192/zahau-family-files-federal-wrongful-death-lawsuit
Read more: http://www.ehow.com/facts_6058385_state-court-vs_-federal-court.html#ixzz2ZNCxQMv6
Diversity jurisdiction - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I'm confused. I'm not seeing the part that suggests the defendants were responsible if Rebecca committed suicide. I'm seeing her death referred to clearly as murder. I do see something that says all three defendants are responsible in one way or another for Rebecca's murder, whether through direct physical involvement or withholding knowledge of a plot to murder her. I also see many references to acts *and* omissions, as well as references to concealing evidence after the fact. So it seems to me they are suggesting all three are responsible even if the physical act of murder was accomplished by only one or two of the three defendants (or maybe even someone hired by one or more of the defendants). Can someone direct me to the specific part they believe covers the possibility of suicide?
Also, regarding the damaged property, I would guess this is related to the Zahaus' recent request for evidence and belongings to be revealed/returned. "The amount of said property is unknown at present" leads me to believe the Zahaus were either ignored or told some of the evidence/belongings would not be returned because they were lost or destroyed at some point on or after the day Rebecca died.
All of the above is just my opinion.