kaRN
Verified Health Professional - Registered Nurse
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2005
- Messages
- 4,758
- Reaction score
- 43
Good Points. :clap:
No one "accidently" duct tapes a child's mouth/face
Specially when the tape covers the hair. Girls hair at that.
Good Points. :clap:
No one "accidently" duct tapes a child's mouth/face
No it refers to deprived O2 conditions in the trunk is my understanding.Could this have been caused by putting the duct tape across the mouth and the nose?
Amazing post! Thank you for sharing and putting it all into perspective.:blowkiss:Glad to see this thread got bumped up for discussion again. Whenever a thread gets bumped up that interests me I go back and read from the beginning when I can and I did that here. I have to admit that from time to time I still wonder if there is any way that this could have been an accident and a horrible cover-up and KC just got deeper and deeper into her lies and couldn't figure a way out or an ending point for her lies and that maybe she even convinced herself that she didn't do anything to Caylee. My possible scenarios went something like this...
KC put Caylee to sleep with chloroform as she often had before and put duct tape on her mouth to keep her quiet just in case she came to before KC returned. Since she had done this before she wasn't thinking about the possibility that Caylee could die from this. She drove to TL's apt and left Caylee in the trunk asleep and she and TL go to Blockbuster to rent videos. She intended to return to Caylee before she awoke but ended up staying all night with TL and then TL decided to skip school and stay home with KC so by the time she got back to the car (around 11am the next morning) Caylee was dead. KC then returns to the A's home and backs her vehicle in the garage where she takes Caylee out of the trunk and puts the heart sticker on the duct tape and wraps her in the Winnie the Pooh blanket - her way of saying good-bye to her daughter.
I could go on with the scenario but you get the idea. I knew that in that "accidental" scenario that KC would be guilty of manslaughter at the least and possibly even murder 1 because of the chloroform, Caylee's age, and putting her in the trunk and wondered if she knew that as well and that's why she went with the nanny story and refused to say it was an accident...
The bottom line is that I wanted to believe it was an accident whether with the pool or chloroform or whatever. I just didn't want to believe that anyone could kill their own child on purpose, ride around with her in the trunk for days, and then discard her along the side of the road like trash. And I even tried to think that she had to be wasted on drugs and didn't know that she had killed Caylee or disposed of her body. (I have a brother who can lose days when he's popping certain pills. He doesn't remember where he's been, who he's spoken to, what he's done, or anything. A few months ago, he even lost his truck and still has no idea whether he got it stuck and walked away from it or it broke down and he walked away or someone stole it and kicked him out of it. He just "came to" walking down the road 2 days and 80 miles from the last thing he remembers. He is also a violent man and I do believe he could hurt someone or perhaps even kill someone and not even know that he had done it.)
But here's the thing, when he's in these drug induced stupors, he is the only one who doesn't know there is something wrong with him. Even those who don't know him can tell that he is taking something. No one who sees him - friend, foe, or stranger - would say that he was acting "normal" during that time like friends of KC did in the days and weeks following Caylee's death. He might not know what he did during those "blank times" and denies anything anyone says he did - but he doesn't make up stories about it either as KC did with "the nanny kidnapped her" - he just calls you a liar and no one can convince him that he really is the one who shot his own vehicle because it wouldn't start or beat up his girlfriend or spent all paycheck. If KC had been unaware of what she had done she wouldn't have told all those lies to cover it up and as someone earlier in the thread said if it was an accident she would have felt so bad about what she had done that she couldn't function let alone go out and party and tell everyone that Caylee was with the nanny that she has known for years and trusts. And then there's the awful way she cast her away at the side of the road like trash. How could you do that to your child? I simply cannot imagine it. My mother had a little dog that got out of the fence and killed in the highway. She called me at work to tell me her dog had been killed and asked me to come and bury him because she couldn't. I rushed home from work and it was all I could do to wrap him up and dig a hole and bury him. There was the "gross" factor too but I just couldn't hardly get through it because I was weeping so - not just a few tears but weeping at the loss of this little doggie to the point it was all I could do to dig the hole. It was a dog - yes, I loved him - but it was a dog and I could hardly function - even now it brings tears to my eyes to remember that day. How could a mother bag her daughter's body and toss it out on the side of the road and go on with her life as if nothing was wrong? I cannot understand this and yet I have no doubt - reasonable nor unreasonable - that this is exactly what she did.
So for me, it wasn't any one thing that said this was not an accident but it was all the things that I mentioned above and lots more - including the 31 days and the year since then. I admit that I would like to know cause of death if I was on the jury but the fact that the body wasn't discovered in time to determine cause of death would not give me reasonable doubt as to it being an accident with all things taken into consideration - and I say this from one who for months and months WANTED to believe it was a horrible accident. I think a part of me still WANTS to believe that but wanting to believe it simply doesn't make it so. I am looking forward to the presentation of the state's case and the testimony of the experts who will explain many of the reports we have already seen (and many of which I do not yet understand) but for me, there is just no way that this was an accident.
Sorry this became such a long post - I didn't plan it that way... :bang:
Could this have been caused by putting the duct tape across the mouth and the nose?
Regarding her speaking in code, I thought this for a while, then I decided that I, too, was maybe giving her credit for more intelligence than might be warranted. I now think that she just pounced on anything they said to her and agreed heartily (however, potentially, or at this time, or absolutely, or mutually, or ad in finitum) with whatever they said. Like, timer55 is a clue, "yeah, that's it, it's a clue. I'm really trying to help, nobody understands what I'm trying to tell them."I so agree. And I can't overlook the fact that KC SEEMED to be speaking in "code" to Lee. She DID admit her computer password as being "Timer 55" and when asked if her PW was a clue she said YES! And low and behold, Caylee was found 55 seconds (drive Time) away from the A home. Yeah, I know, I know...Timer 55 would also seem to relate to the day she set this PW with the departure date of the PR vacay she did not attend. So what. It doesn't NEGATE the FACT that it also relates to Caylee's "dump site". JMHO.
For me the accident theory just doesn't hold water. That and given the jury instructions for Florida I just don't see anyway this could be a justifiable or excusable homicide.
Everyone here knows the evidence, no sense in rehashing that. I think the evidence at hand is pretty clear it wasn't an accident.
Other things that in my mind rule out an accident are the fact that Caylee was not found with swimming clothes. Kinda rules out the pool in my mind. That and the level Casey was willing to go to cover it up. It's one thing to take police to Universal and say you work there. Its another thing entirely to take them down a hallway to your office. The fact that the jig was clearly up and she continued and even now continues to lie says all I need to know and more then proves to me this was no accident. It's Casey actions in this case that prove it wasn't an accident.
I am so sorry for your loss.It is excruciating to lose a child.Only more so to watch another mother throw her's away.You are right.KC has not grieved for her child,only for herself.As far as the accident theory I do not for one second believe it. If it was any type of accident KC actions would have been that of a grieving mother. There is no possible way to explain her behavior. She had baggage and she dumped it like garbage. that is my opinoin only. I have heard every excuse in the book for someone doing something wrong but to KC she did nothing wrong. Her tears are that of being caught no more no less. We all have cried over loss family friends and pets. I can tell you only from my own experience that I had a still born baby and still to this day I blame myself. I did what they told me to do but it was too late. I know medically she had a heart defect but that doesnt take away from the blame. When my daughter died I cried for no less than 6 weeks I never left the house wouldnt answer the phone ..you get the idea. KC facial expressions alone are not that of a grieving mother but of someone with no remorse. What makes it even harder I would have given my life for my baby I would have sold my soul to the devil but it didnt help. I can never understand how god gives babies to people who abuse ignore and kill them and took mine away. ...You need a licsense to own a dog, go fishing, drive but any a$$hole can have a baby...where is the sense in that??? IMO
I am so sorry for your loss.It is excruciating to lose a child.Only more so to watch another mother throw her's away.You are right.KC has not grieved for her child,only for herself.
For me the accident theory just doesn't hold water. That and given the jury instructions for Florida I just don't see anyway this could be a justifiable or excusable homicide.
Everyone here knows the evidence, no sense in rehashing that. I think the evidence at hand is pretty clear it wasn't an accident.
Other things that in my mind rule out an accident are the fact that Caylee was not found with swimming clothes. Kinda rules out the pool in my mind. That and the level Casey was willing to go to cover it up. It's one thing to take police to Universal and say you work there. Its another thing entirely to take them down a hallway to your office. The fact that the jig was clearly up and she continued and even now continues to lie says all I need to know and more then proves to me this was no accident. It's Casey actions in this case that prove it wasn't an accident.
I agree. This case is clearly not justifiable homicide -- like self defense, defense of another or defending your home. It also is not excusable homicide because the "ordinary standard of care" was not met. Leaving a child with unsupervised access to a pool or in a hot car is way beyond the ordinary standard of care. So, that's out the door too. Not an accident. People usually say it was an accident when they mean the don't think there was premeditation. I suggest people study the legal concept of premeditation. Premeditation can take six months or six seconds. It doesn't take much. Proving premeditation is often based on circumstantial evidence because we can never get inside the mind of another person and know their thoughts for sure. Still, the prosecutors prove it up all the time based on evidence just like what is before us in this case.
No. I didn't get to those, AZ. I had limited time. You can post them if you like. It would fill out the set.Did you post jury instructions in the other thread for aggravated manslaughter of a child? The applicable Florida statutes mentioned in the indictment are 782.07(3) and 827.03(3). This, I think, would cover the "swimming pool accident" theory, although IMHO the duct tape evidence is inconsistent with any reasonable variant of that theory.
I don't see why the tape wouldn't be admissible.
On another note...I'm really glad I started this thread. The replies have all contained great points and at some point (after the next document dump) I will make a list of all the evidence/actions that point against an "accident" theory (as opposed to evidence like the heart stickers and laundry bags and such that merely connect Casey to a dead Caylee). Oh and - "one_hooah_wife" - great point about the "evidence" that the defense won't in fact use an accident defense (why would they be interested in the forensics?) To be honest, I was relieved to read your reasoning in there b/c I really do not want to see an accident defense after all this (they wouldn't even admit it was Caylee's dead body in the trunk...it was another dead body!) Thanks again for everyone's input. As more doc dumps happen, let's keep adding to the list of "no accident" type evidence.