DQN
Former Member
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2016
- Messages
- 569
- Reaction score
- 68
Spota... are the feds after him??
IMO it's all coming down the pipeline in the investigation.
Spota... are the feds after him??
It makes sense Hawkshaw, Loeb referred to as nasty *advertiser censored* and last night's episode referred to it as illegal *advertiser censored*. IMO It was Burke's collection or perhaps for the sex parties that went on with the rich and powerful as Hawkshaw mentioned last night. You have to question if it was Burke's personal collection what was it doing in his Department (Chief) SUV?:yuck:
Now why would he have a tape with such a photo if not a pedophile ? (yep, rhetorical question)
You, TOO. I hope I have offered all you folks some entertainment during the last couple of years. I have to believe most of you guys now understand why I have been writing things some of you thought had no bearing on the case. Are you starting to get the picture by now? I might be 180 wrong, but my points are valid. I haven't a clue who murdered those gals, but I think I can say the investigation appears to be severely flawed.
I think it would be helpful for you websleuthers to read a column in Vice.Com, written on March 16, 2016 by Michael Edison Hayden.
That column tells us what this Burke fellow is really all about.
Read where a witness tells us how Burke, him, and many other SCPD were frequent visitors at Gossips, a Suffolk County strip joint and had their way with the strippers. It will tell you that because of this item alone it is possible that it could lead to murder if things didnt go right and a risk of being exposed was possible. Read where the witness tells us drugs were involved.
WE know that one of the reasons woman turn to prostitution is because they are addicted to drugs. We know that Burke had a long relationship with a prostitute and that association. We know that led to the horrendous 1995 IAB report where it was substantiated that Burke had such a relationship with a known prostitute, drug addict, and thief. She had already amassed over 27 arrests in Burkes own precinct, and he didnt know anything about it.
We know he was brought in as a witness in a divorce case because he had a relationship with a married woman and the husband sued for divorce. When asked by the husbands attorney if he ever had a relationship with prostitutes, other than in the line of duty he said, NO. That was in 2000 or 5 years after he was deemed by IAB to have had such a relationship. AND guess whose law firm represented him in that sworn deposition?
I think the detectives have a pretty good idea as to the Who, What, When, Why, and How these murders occurred. Like I said in the interview: The detectives are probably frustrated because they cant move on to where they have to go.
I think Burke is an excellent person of interest just of what we know about him with factual information. I am not even talking about what I have learned, was told, information I believe is probably true. There is not a shadow of a doubt he is such a criminal a 50 year sentence wouldnt have shocked my conscience. With what I have seen him done I can tell you murder is the next step, if he hasnt done that already. I do believe he is a coward and killing someone takes some measure of guts. But when you are cornered like a rat you will strike out at those that can get you out of that corner.
You heard on the show last night that Spota nixed the FBI from doing a profile? Who T.F. is Tom Spota to come up with that one. Truth is I think most profiles are like placebos for the public they only work at Wednesday Nights, Channel 2, @ 9PM. A profile is like chicken soup it cant hurt.
Spota doesnt want BAU to step in because he doesnt want the FEDS poking around and asking questions or hear things from people that have been kept under wraps.
You folks will recall that in Kolkers book where he interviewed Brewer, Brewer said if the truth comes out a lot of cops are going to have pie on their face.
It was also said the PC Dormer said if the whole truth came out it would blow the lid off of Suffolk County.
One thing about the show that annoyed me was the producers going back to Peter Brandt for his opinion. He said no killer would dispose of bodies so close to where they lived. He mentioned the Mesa killings which was 2.6miles from a major suspect. I guess he forgot about Gacy burying his victims under the floor boards of his own house and the other serial killer that did the same, as many others have done in the past. The very idea up to 11 bodies were disposed of in the same area, and the GB4 were dumped very close to each other, and put together with the death of SG, makes me wonder what the killer(s) were thinking about when they returned to the scene of the crime when they had thousands of areas to dump bodies in desolate areas with a short car ride.
I think the detectives have a pretty good idea as to the Who, What, When, Why, and How these murders occurred. Like I said in the interview: The detectives are probably frustrated because they cant move on to where they have to go.
I think Burke is an excellent person of interest just of what we know about him with factual information. I am not even talking about what I have learned, was told, information I believe is probably true. There is not a shadow of a doubt he is such a criminal a 50 year sentence wouldnt have shocked my conscience. With what I have seen him done I can tell you murder is the next step, if he hasnt done that already. I do believe he is a coward and killing someone takes some measure of guts. But when you are cornered like a rat you will strike out at those that can get you out of that corner.
You heard on the show last night that Spota nixed the FBI from doing a profile? Who T.F. is Tom Spota to come up with that one. Truth is I think most profiles are like placebos for the public they only work at Wednesday Nights, Channel 2, @ 9PM. A profile is like chicken soup it cant hurt.
Spota doesnt want BAU to step in because he doesnt want the FEDS poking around and asking questions or hear things from people that have been kept under wraps.
You folks will recall that in Kolkers book where he interviewed Brewer, Brewer said if the truth comes out a lot of cops are going to have pie on their face.
It was also said the PC Dormer said if the whole truth came out it would blow the lid off of Suffolk County.
One thing about the show that annoyed me was the producers going back to Peter Brandt for his opinion. He said no killer would dispose of bodies so close to where they lived. He mentioned the Mesa killings which was 2.6miles from a major suspect. I guess he forgot about Gacy burying his victims under the floor boards of his own house and the other serial killer that did the same, as many others have done in the past. The very idea up to 11 bodies were disposed of in the same area, and the GB4 were dumped very close to each other, and put together with the death of SG, makes me wonder what the killer(s) were thinking about when they returned to the scene of the crime when they had thousands of areas to dump bodies in desolate areas with a short car ride.
I think it would be helpful for you websleuthers to read a column in Vice.Com, written on March 16, 2016 by Michael Edison Hayden.
That column tells us what this Burke fellow is really all about.
Read where a witness tells us how Burke, him, and many other SCPD were frequent visitors at Gossips, a Suffolk County strip joint and had their way with the strippers. It will tell you that because of this item alone it is possible that it could lead to murder if things didnt go right and a risk of being exposed was possible. Read where the witness tells us drugs were involved.
WE know that one of the reasons woman turn to prostitution is because they are addicted to drugs. We know that Burke had a long relationship with a prostitute and that association. We know that led to the horrendous 1995 IAB report where it was substantiated that Burke had such a relationship with a known prostitute, drug addict, and thief. She had already amassed over 27 arrests in Burkes own precinct, and he didnt know anything about it.
We know he was brought in as a witness in a divorce case because he had a relationship with a married woman and the husband sued for divorce. When asked by the husbands attorney if he ever had a relationship with prostitutes, other than in the line of duty he said, NO. That was in 2000 or 5 years after he was deemed by IAB to have had such a relationship. AND guess whose law firm represented him in that sworn deposition?
This sounds like a case for the innocent project and/or Kathleen ZellnerA STORY FOR THOSE THAT LIKE TO READ THIS STUFF. After I retired I got involved in a case where 3 men were arrested and convicted of a double murder. One of the victims was an NYPD cop working off-duty. I was fascinated with the case. After only two weeks of studying the case I came to conclusion that these men just didn't do it and they were framed by the cops ( some I worked with ) the DA, with the help of the trial judge. In contrast to my SIL's case it took me more than a year and after the trial to come to the same conviction that my SIL was 100% innocent and was framed. It took me only two weeks to understand these three men were entirely innocent in every sense of the word. And these three men were all convicted in three separate trials by the same judge and ADA.
One day I go to the prison to talk to one of these fellows. Behind me was another man that was convicted of shooting a cop and wounding him. He got 25 to Life. I never saw him there and if I did I wouldn't have never recognized him
After I leave that man asks my guy who I was. I stood out because I was white. My guy tells him to write me a letter and I might help him/ He writes me that letter and before I finish reading the first paragraph describing his arrest my hands start shaking: I WAS THE GUY THAT FIRST PUT MY HANDS ON HIM when we jumped out of a van to arrest him. I didn't believe then and I still don't believe it today this guy did what he was convicted of. I was just a minor player in the investigation and had no say who was to be arrested. I informed him of my opinion. But I had little evidence that could set aside a guilty verdict. There was nothing I could do. That fellow was an admitted drug dealer, but no someone so foolish to shoot a cop in the circumstances outlined in the indictment. He was expendable. The guy has already done 25 years with little chance of parole because nobody cares.
He came up for parole a few months ago.About two weeks before the hearing the cop's that got shot has a son, a cop, that got shot under very similar circumstances as his father was shot.....HE HAD NO CHANCE OF GETTING PAROLE after that. He never confessed to the crime and has never admitted same to the parole board before the last hearing and the one before it. You will NEVER get parole unless you admit you did it and now feel remorse for it. He will not confess to a crime he didn't do and he won't admit to it.
Another Suffolk Co. railroad job. Youtube Marty Tankleff exonerated in death of parents.