As many of you folks might know is I went off on a tangent trying to explain what the framing of my former son in law was all about. I took a lot of flak for what perceived as a personal agenda to discredit some of these people to further that agenda. I can fully understand why many of you folks would be of that opinion. Trust me when I say it is all connected and it demonstrated an ongoing conspiracy to suppress the truth.
It is my information that the DA sent his ranking ADA down to Florida with 3 detectives simply to execute a Material Witness Order to bring back Burke’s neighbor who was mentioned as the leader of a wide-spread ring of burglars, stick-up men. He was also a suspect in the murders of two confidential informants. The detectives were understandably angry after they were putting a case together and their star witness that was giving information about Burke’s neighbor, Joe C. The witness, the late PG was murdered only three weeks after he became known to the DA office and Burke.
It has always been my contention that JSP was sent with the detectives to ensure that JC would not run off the mouth about who he knew and what he knew because other detectives would learn about Burke. JC invoked his right to an attorney. JSP would ensure no detective would speak to him because, after-all he was, as an ADA was an officer of the court and he could allow no such thing.
Sending as ADA to Florida is one thing, but not usual, sending a trusted Bureau Chief is quite another thing.
It had been reported that JC waived his right to be returned and the Order was not invoked. That same day, October 28, 2003, JC ‘voluntarily’ waives his right to contest and gets on a plane to return to Long Island. In a matter of a couple of days he is sitting with JSP, and JC’s lawyer RP and they are hatching out a scheme to get him out of what detectives are investigating.
On 11/13/03, JC is telling detectives that my former son in law participated in an armed robbery with him of the Strathmore Bagel Company on 7/25/00. As most of you know by now my son in law was in Europe on that day, and it was proven in court at his trial.
On 7/2/04, JC repeated that lie in sworn testimony before Judge James Hudson. JC’a lawyer RP, a lawyer reported to be very close to JSP was in the courtroom representing JC. In short, JC lied. Warnings given by Hudson that he must cooperate in my son in law’s case must be truthful, otherwise he would revoke the plea agreement and allow JC to withdraw his guilty plea (37 violent felonies, to wit he received not a day in jail and while he was actively engaging in a wide-spread mortgage/bank fraud scheme in Boca Raton, FL.
Hudson heard that lie being exposed in his very courtroom, and, obviously did not so ‘shock his conscience’ that he did nothing when he was shown to be a fool that accepted anything the DA told him to accept.