I know he should not have followed him, but I can see why he might have- to keep track of him for police, and afaik there is no law about following people. And if he approached TM, he should not have, and afaik there is no law about approaching people, I am assuming from witness statements in articles that there was a physical altercation before the shot. IF there was a fight then I can see the self defense claim.
This was horrible. TM was out walking back from a store like thousands of other teens do. He should not have been killed. But what can be changed? I am honestly asking because this should never happen again. I am struggling to find, besides GZ personal choices which were all legal until possibly the altercation, anything that could be changed.
Afaik. As far as I know.
Exactly. I think I bypassed the GZ should have been arrested debate and went straight to trying to figure out if there is anything that could be changed so that this doesn't happen again. I agree, if you shoot someone self defense, accident, whatever, you should have to go through the same evidence collection procedures and interviews as if it was a homicide. Straight to the police station, do not go home, do not change clothes.
Are we sure that GZ didn't go in for questioning or that they didn't collect his clothes/blood samples/etc? did he go to the hospital for his injuries? If he had any.
Stlydn Just read your post that answered some of my questions. Thx
Here's the thing. When you look at what needs to be changed, it is all on GZ and local law enforcement. You say GZ didn't do anything wrong (and I'll get to that) but what did Tray do wrong? He is the one who is dead.
Is it wrong to go for a walk or walk to a store at 7 pm? No.
Is it wrong for a teen to buy iced tea or skittles? No.
Is it wrong for a teen to wear a hoodie, especially if it is on the chilly side and possibly drizzling? No. (I would submit that it is practically mandatory.)
Is it wrong, if you see a car following you, to look inside to see if it's someone you know or if someone needs help? No.
Is it wrong to run if you sense danger? NO!
In fact, I have three children, one of whom is a son Tray's age, and I have been telling them since they were allowed outside without me that if someone approaches them in a car to get away. Don't talk to them (it might provoke them), don't offer to help, don't get within arm's reach. Just run back to me or to a neighbor, and yell at the top of your lungs for help until someone pays attention.
So I can't find fault with one thing that Tray has done. We don't even have anyone to claim or even suggest that he fought until GZ overcame him on foot and assaulted him. NOT ONE witness has said that Tray stopped running and came towards GZ or even said anything rude to him (also, not wrong or illegal when some creep is following you).
Well if Tray didn't do anything wrong, what did GZ do wrong?
GZ saw a "suspicious" person, assumed (incorrectly, AFAIK) that Tray was definitely on drugs, and up to something. Is this wrong? Yes. On several counts. Legally he is still okay, but from what we know the only thing Tray did that was suspicious was to be born black and wear a hoodie.
GZ called the police. Since he didn't call 911, I will assume he was asking for "backup" and recognized that this was no emergency. This is not wrong or illegal.
GZ was specifically told not to get out of the car or to follow Tray. While technically not illegal, I don't see how anyone would argue that this made sense. If he had witnessed an actual crime or was intervening to protect someone else or their property, sure. But he was following a kid walking down the street. Was this illegal? No. Was it the "but for" act that set this all into motion. Yes.
Once he came upon Tray, he obviously confronted him. Tray was trying to get away, and I don't see any scenario where he turns to fight UNLESS he were cornered, which still makes GZ the aggressor. Is this wrong? YES! Is it illegal? I believe it is.
At some point, Tray is laying FACE DOWN on the ground and GZ is standing over him with a gun. GZ could have held the gun on him until LE arrived. GZ was not wrestling with Tray and the gun accidentally went off. GZ murdered Tray in cold blood for absolutely no reason. Is this wrong? Yes. Is it illegal? Yes.
I can't even go through what LE did that was wrong because it was all wrong. I think the only thing they did right was actually show up at the scene. This is all on GZ, and there is nothing to change this outcome except to arrest GZ and make it very clear that this is not self-defense.
Right now GZ reminds me of my two stupid dogs who bark exactly the same at the kids who tp'ed our house and a leaf blowing across the yard. If you are that dumb, you shouldn't be allowed to carry a weapon...or really, go outside alone. The dogs sure aren't.
***PS...one thing no one has pointed out yet is that GZ was a neighborhood watch captain. In at least two neighborhoods where I have lived, they have been "trained" by local LE. And maybe that's the problem.