Adrienne37
Former Member
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2004
- Messages
- 3,262
- Reaction score
- 8
Any kind of correct information adds to an understanding of what happened IMO. When there are continual discreptancies, it only tends to muddy the waters. The timeline has been way off from the beginning. Much has been made of GZ's 'cop wannabe' *attitude*. Shouldn't we also be curious as to the *attitude* of TM that night? So far, in what I've read, we don't have knowledge of which of these persons was calling for 'help' before the shooting. At least one of the witnesses first said it was GZ, and that's what GZ himself said to LE. TM's father said the voice wasn't that of his son. GZ, at least in my opinion, didn't sound 'out of control' on the 911 call he made. And he didn't sound like he was *running*, as he was able to maintain a conversation with the 911 operator. I think it would be important to know if TM did leave his home *during the game* simply to get snacks. Or if TM left his home say after an argument with his father, and that's why his father didn't go out to look for him. Why did his father call police to see if he'd been arrested as his only method of 'looking for him'. If GZ 'chased him down and shot him in cold blood' then he should be charged with that crime. But before making a judgement on any of this, I for one, would like to know everything that would/could/might play into the dynamics of that night. :moo:
The fact that TM's father said 'he'd brought TM to this place to 'work out' what ever reason he was suspended from school for, IMO, does play a role. Especially if, as I'd read, TM's mother 'takes him to school each day'. If that is the case, then why is he excessively late enough to get suspended? Does anyone else recall whether TM had just started at this school a number of weeks earlier? I *thought* I'd read that he'd recently changed schools? Something like six weeks earlier. That would have put the change after the xmas holidays? No reason other than it being another piece of the puzzle. Just curious again. Did he just start at this new school and was already suspended? I can't recall for sure, and hopefully I'm not confusing this with another case, but I distinctly recall hearing *some* mother say 'I drove him to school each morning' in an interview on TV. This was early on, when this case was first brought to the attention of the general public. Much like with any case, each piece of information is another puzzle piece IMO. And in order to see the whole picture, we have to have pieces that fit together. :moo:
There is no puzzle in this case. We aren't trying to determine who the shooter is, that's already known. The VICTIM'S actions in the previous 17 years of his life is completely and totally irrelevant. If anything, perhaps people should delve deeper into the background of the MURDERER in this case. Trayvon is a VICTIM, nothing is going to change this fact. GEORGE ZIMMERMAN is a MURDERER who should be locked up and charged with FIRST DEGREE MURDER.
~jmo~