[/B]
BBM
Completely, totally, 1000% agree with every fiber of my being! As are the majority of society, I believe. So if the majority are in agreement on the sissy-sentencing, why is no one listening to us?
Also, the "formulas" for sentencing keeps a court from giving what we would consider an appropriate sentence. I'm linking the federal sex offender sentencing here
http://www.ehow.com/about_5468645_sex-offender-sentencing-guidelines.html
And most of us would consider the rape of a child to be cruel and unusual, yet these baby rapers are coddled in my opinion. They get protective status throughout their incarceration, lawyers and appeals on our dime, and counseling. Why do they need counseling? I don't believe for one second that any kind of counseling or therapy, even chemical castration works. Castration doesn't work because all of their evilness begins in their brain (not that I wouldn't volunteer to physically castrate any of these sobs' myself). Once castrated, they will find other "ways" :sick: to molest and rape.
I believe it was JaxFlaGal that posted this
As he was about to leave prison in 1999, the state flagged Smith as likely to reoffend and be dangerous in the future. Psychiatrists who evaluated him agreed. [B}Just 1 percent of all sex offenders and predators get such a recommendation.[/B]
:banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead:
1 percent?? Really? That makes me even angrier! An SO has been red-flagged from the get-go by professionals as likely to re-offend, but sure, we'll release him, it's not like he's going to be in my neighborhood once he gets out. Maybe we should start setting up tents in the yards of those that believe he can be rehabliltated and just let the freaks out early.
Sorry, I got on my soapbox. Now I've got to calm down so I can get some sleep