GUILTY FL - Cherish Perrywinkle, 8, Jacksonville, 21 June 2013 #2

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Two changing room escorts killed two birds with one stone, pardon the poor phrasing.

For Cherish, he either built her trust by safely delivering her to and from the fitting rooms w/o doing anything untoward, or he gradually did untoward things, gauged her reaction/non-reaction, and moved forward with his plan.

For Mom, he trained her quickly to believe that if he disappeared with Cherish, he always returned with her.

What kind of mother even takes the chance the first time? Repeated disappearances but he always returned .... didn't she even consider that he might not return the first time?

As for the circus that the funeral has become, I'll keep my opinion to myself on that - as I don't think I can be trusted to say what I feel about turning the viewing of that little girl's body into a public event.

And the money being raised ...... I sure hope someone is keeping tabs on every cent of each donation. It should be put in trust for the childrens' education. The parents shouldn't get to spend a penny of it on themselves. Maybe I'm cynical, but I find myself wondering how many dresses R could buy with all those well-meant donations.
 
This is the first case I've heard of where a child victim of sexual assault and murder had a public viewing of her open casket. I don't think any sex offenders would come to meet up with other sex offenders; I think they would come to leer at this violated little girl, knowing what her body had been through.

-Just my (horrifying) opinion.

ETA: And to answer your other question: No, I don't think anyone whipped out their clicking camera with a paparazzi lense, but I do think that not everyone with a cell-phone camera has strong morals and values.

Jorelys Rivera did. And though her face was horribly disfigured, they insisted on open casket. There was a sheer veil draped over the casket to mute the fact that her facial repair the funeral home did would never make her face look normal again. Pictures of her in the open casket were published in Puerto Rican newspapers, IIRC, where the father still lived at the time of her murder.

Open casket viewing, even on children, is common in some cultures, a horror to other cultures. Even in America, people view it differently.

I come from a long line of people who prefer cremation and NO casket viewing, just a memorial service. But I understand people have varying views on this stuff.

My hubby's extended family all immigrated from the Philippines, and it's very common, no matter the age of the deceased, to take a picture of the deceased in their casket. I don't know why. I guess they feel it's important to immortalize this final moment. Anyway, I didn't know this when I was engaged to my hubby and went home with him for Christmas that first time.

So we're flipping through photo albums, there's hubby as a child at Disney, hubby riding a bike for the first time, oops, there's grandpa in his casket. :thud:
 
What kind of mother even takes the chance the first time? Repeated disappearances but he always returned .... didn't she even consider that he might not return the first time?
As for the circus that the funeral has become, I'll keep my opinion to myself on that - as I don't think I can be trusted to say what I feel about turning the viewing of that little girl's body into a public event.

And the money being raised ...... I sure hope someone is keeping tabs on every cent of each donation. It should be put in trust for the childrens' education. The parents shouldn't get to spend a penny of it on themselves. Maybe I'm cynical, but I find myself wondering how many dresses R could buy with all those well-meant donations.

BBM

Sadly, it appears the answer is no. :notgood:
 
I am starting to be skeptical of every single person involved in this case.
 
i don't mind family taking photos of the deceased in the casket for their private albums - whatever helps them grieve ... but it's different imo when it's two thousand strangers who didn't know her and you don't know what they might do with the photos.
 
i don't mind family taking photos of the deceased in the casket for their private albums - whatever helps them grieve ... but it's different imo when it's two thousand strangers who didn't know her and you don't know what they might do with the photos.

I agree. And not to put to fine a point on it, but the person who is making these funeral decisions (burial/cremation, public/private, closed casket/open, media allowed/not allowed) is also the person who piled three children in a stranger's van and sent one child to changing rooms with him. So I guess nothing, at this point, should shock us.
 
"Action News will have respectful live coverage on CBS 47 and FOX 30, as well as a live stream at ActionNewsJax.com." (my bolding)

http://www.actionnewsjax.com/conten...erish-Perrywinkle/kBlpqFPYC02ggWPYl6hZMQ.cspx

The fact that the news station felt the need to include that caveat tells me that even they find her open casket + news cameras creepy.

Nah, news media doesn't care how tacky they are to garner headlines and attract viewers, they care about how tacky they APPEAR. They threw in the 'respectful' so they couldn't be bashed for horning in on a funeral, IMO.

"We're bringing cameras into the funeral, but, no worries, we're doing it respectfully, with respectful shots only. Tune in at 5!" :twocents:
 
"Action News will have respectful live coverage on CBS 47 and FOX 30, as well as a live stream at ActionNewsJax.com." (my bolding)

http://www.actionnewsjax.com/conten...erish-Perrywinkle/kBlpqFPYC02ggWPYl6hZMQ.cspx

The fact that the news station felt the need to include that caveat tells me that even they find her open casket + news cameras creepy.

I agree that the open casket is creepy and very unusual for a public service for a murdered child. But cameras at a service, being filmed by the media is not that unusual. There have been a few services for murdered children that have been televised in the past.
 
On a recent day at Rayne Perrywinkle's home, her boyfriend and the father of her two youngest children, Aharon Pearson, walked outside and asked a reporter, "Do you have the number for Child Protective Services?" He initially thought the state's child welfare agency had taken their children, but later explained he misunderstood Perrywinkle and that the children had been taken only for an interview.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/06/2...-at-church-was-victim-predator/#ixzz2XX35ZhTn

........
 
I was fully aware it was going to be an open casket days ago, it was announced msm. i forget how it was worded but i took it to mean 'open' casket. If i picked up on that - others did too. i do not agree with that choice, at all. Cherish is NOT for the public consumption.
 
I agree. And not to put to fine a point on it, but the person who is making these funeral decisions (burial/cremation, public/private, closed casket/open, media allowed/not allowed) is also the person who piled three children in a stranger's van and sent one child to changing rooms with him. So I guess nothing, at this point, should shock us.

EXACTLY. I wouldn't be surprised if the person had charged admission.
 
I was fully aware it was going to be an open casket days ago, it was announced msm. i forget how it was worded but i took it to mean 'open' casket. If i picked up on that - others did too. i do not agree with that choice, at all. Cherish is NOT for the public consumption.

I think the wording was "viewing".
Some may disagree, but it almost seems a bit like a final indignity for this child. Who was not well protected in life or now death.
 
I agree that the open casket is creepy and very unusual for a public service for a murdered child. But cameras at a service, being filmed by the media is not that unusual. There have been a few services for murdered children that have been televised in the past.

Please don't misunderstand. As I said upthread, a memorial service, okay, I get it.
But a sexually-abused/murdered child + open casket + television cameras and being live-streamed on the Internet is completely inappropriate and disrespectful.

Close her coffin and I don't have a problem.
 
I KNOW I read somewhere that RP was inviting "the public and media" to the viewing. UGH. I keep thinking of all the pictures of her little body the freaking media has in their hands. Makes me ill.
 

But Perrywinkle had some troubling issues, the report noted, including eviction, a lack of money and some admitted mental health issues that led her to make poor choices.

"I fear for the child's future living with Ms. Perrywinkle," wrote evaluator Robert Wood. "I do not make my recommendation lightly. I have given many, many hours of thought to the case."
 
EXACTLY. I wouldn't be surprised if the person had charged admission.

You wouldn't be the only person on this thread who had that thought. I truly think the invitation for the news cameras is a calculated move on the mother's part. Sympathetic people are usually very generous ones, if you catch my drift.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
231
Guests online
305
Total visitors
536

Forum statistics

Threads
608,507
Messages
18,240,432
Members
234,389
Latest member
Roberto859
Back
Top