He was hired by the attorney representing a Rabbi. He was working for the defense against the Justice Dept.
So, DM was consulting in this case based on his expertise in conspiracy law ? My somewhat limited understanding of this is that a group of orthodox rabbis had allegedly conspired to force some men to give their wives a get ? So that the wives could then obtain divorces ? and apparently two of the rabbis used violence to coerce the men to sign the gets ?
One question I have is : what would have happened if DM had trouble with the ethics of the case ? Did he believe that the rabbis had, in fact, conspired and coerced the men in question ? Why else would this case be considered a possible reason for the people involved to hire a murderer ?