i originally thought that princess had no advance knowledge based on her "TV repairman/hiring a hitman" police interview (a trained lawyer could not be that absurdly dumb was my thought) but now i'm starting to wonder based on seeing LR's interview. LE would've probably been very happy if LR simply implicated KM (because nailing her eventually leads to her flip on the masterminds) and he really has nothing to gain implicating princess other than simply telling the truth to fulfill his end of the bargain for fear of not losing his deal. but LR stating that princess was there, why she was there, why and what she wanted done, and that she had spoken to SG is pretty damning IMO. and how would LR know exactly who/where princess was at the time of the crime? for all LR knew she was in another part of the state/country/world which would not corroborate his story. and "the lady wanted custody" is also damning. why would LR risk his deal to lie about princess when his flip on KM and SG was plenty of a bargaining chip? makes no sense.
