GUILTY FL - Dan Markel, 41, FSU law professor, Tallahassee, 18 July 2014 - #3 *Arrests*

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
MilNeumMom said:
My opinion only...
I suspect that the reason we are being told simultaneously that WA was searching for info on Dan's girlfriend AND that she was searching teacher/student *advertiser censored* is because WA was planning/considering distributing a pornographic likeness (the closest she could find) of Dan's unwitting girlfriend -claiming that it was her - to embarrass, humiliate and hurt Dan and his girlfriend and/or perhaps cast a negative light on her as a possible future stepmother. -- My opinion only --
-This is how psychopaths think-
Click to expand...

Ahhh.....now this makes sense to me. Thank u!
 
MilNeumMom said:
WA must have known Dan's girlfriend's occupation. Hence the type of *advertiser censored* WA searched. I'm just sayin'...
M O O

Thanks for your feedback!
Click to expand...
Yes, DM’s NYU girlfriend did research on *advertiser censored* and she had several published articles about her *advertiser censored* research. It could be WA was simply, out of curiosity, doing various key word internet searches related to AA’s work.
 
SeesSeas said:
Yes, DM’s NYU girlfriend did research on *advertiser censored* and she had several published articles about her *advertiser censored* research. It could be WA was simply, out of curiosity, doing various key word internet searches related to AA’s work.
Click to expand...

Makes sense.

I'd hate for people to see my browsing history since much of it is inspired by Websleuths!
 
Above the Law has a very pro-Adelson piece today:
http://abovethelaw.com/2016/08/the-dan-markel-murder-case-the-adelson-family-speaks/

It contains strong denials from all of the family that they were in any way involved in the murder, as well as confirmation that they are all lawyered-up.

Assume that Garcia and Rivera did it. Then what is the Adelsons' theory for their motive? (I understand that in any prosecution, the burden is on the state, and the defendant doesn't have to prove anything, but jurors will still want to hear a plausible story.) Are we to believe that it's simply coincidence that W's ex-husband was killed by a guy who has 2 kids with the sometime-GF of W's brother, who happened to work at the dental office where W's brother and both parents worked? If the As were not involved, they have got to be the unluckiest people on the planet.

The timing of the As' statement is curious. I wonder if it has anything to do with the grand jury re-convening tomorrow: http://www.wctv.tv/content/news/Gra...to-review-Markel-case-evidence-384831441.html
 
Russian Blue said:
I agree with everything your are saying, but I bet they are as lawyered up as one can be. Like white on rice. This is a family, circle of friends, community of lawyers, professional and academia of law professionals ---with big bucks to boot! Oh yeah they are lawyered up to the hilt.
Click to expand...

You can read about their lawyers today I posted earlier a two new articles.
 
andplusalso a completely different part of the state.

BSBC said:
Above the Law has a very pro-Adelson piece today:
http://abovethelaw.com/2016/08/the-dan-markel-murder-case-the-adelson-family-speaks/

It contains strong denials from all of the family that they were in any way involved in the murder, as well as confirmation that they are all lawyered-up.

Assume that Garcia and Rivera did it. Then what is the Adelsons' theory for their motive? (I understand that in any prosecution, the burden is on the state, and the defendant doesn't have to prove anything, but jurors will still want to hear a plausible story.) Are we to believe that it's simply coincidence that W's ex-husband was killed by a guy who has 2 kids with the sometime-GF of W's brother, who happened to work at the dental office where W's brother and both parents worked? If the As were not involved, they have got to be the unluckiest people on the planet.

The timing of the As' statement is curious. I wonder if it has anything to do with the grand jury re-convening tomorrow: http://www.wctv.tv/content/news/Gra...to-review-Markel-case-evidence-384831441.html
Click to expand...
 
BSBC said:
Above the Law has a very pro-Adelson piece today:
http://abovethelaw.com/2016/08/the-dan-markel-murder-case-the-adelson-family-speaks/

It contains strong denials from all of the family that they were in any way involved in the murder, as well as confirmation that they are all lawyered-up.

Assume that Garcia and Rivera did it. Then what is the Adelsons' theory for their motive? (I understand that in any prosecution, the burden is on the state, and the defendant doesn't have to prove anything, but jurors will still want to hear a plausible story.) Are we to believe that it's simply coincidence that W's ex-husband was killed by a guy who has 2 kids with the sometime-GF of W's brother, who happened to work at the dental office where W's brother and both parents worked? If the As were not involved, they have got to be the unluckiest people on the planet.

The timing of the As' statement is curious. I wonder if it has anything to do with the grand jury re-convening tomorrow: http://www.wctv.tv/content/news/Gra...to-review-Markel-case-evidence-384831441.html
Click to expand...
their publicist must be working around the clock. So many coincidences to divert or negate.
 
BSBC said:
Above the Law has a very pro-Adelson piece today:
http://abovethelaw.com/2016/08/the-dan-markel-murder-case-the-adelson-family-speaks/

It contains strong denials from all of the family that they were in any way involved in the murder, as well as confirmation that they are all lawyered-up.

Assume that Garcia and Rivera did it. Then what is the Adelsons' theory for their motive? (I understand that in any prosecution, the burden is on the state, and the defendant doesn't have to prove anything, but jurors will still want to hear a plausible story.) Are we to believe that it's simply coincidence that W's ex-husband was killed by a guy who has 2 kids with the sometime-GF of W's brother, who happened to work at the dental office where W's brother and both parents worked? If the As were not involved, they have got to be the unluckiest people on the planet.

The timing of the As' statement is curious. I wonder if it has anything to do with the grand jury re-convening tomorrow: http://www.wctv.tv/content/news/Gra...to-review-Markel-case-evidence-384831441.html
Click to expand...
And Garcia and Rivera, who just happen to live in Miami as do the A's, drove nearly 500 miles in a rented car and decided to follow around and then murder a random person, who just happened to be the ex-husband of a woman whose brother is dating Garcia's ex-GF? Well, well, it is a small world, isn't it?
 
 
BSBC said:
Above the Law has a very pro-Adelson piece today:
http://abovethelaw.com/2016/08/the-dan-markel-murder-case-the-adelson-family-speaks/
Click to expand...

That is some.....credulous reporting from Above the Law. Serious question: has anyone other than the As' lawyers and June Umchinda (who appeared to have been ambushed by a reporter at the time) come forward on the record to defend the A's and even give a stock answer that they don't seem to be the type of people who could ever do such a thing? IMO.
 
Wyle_E_Coyote said:
From your link:

It’s important to keep in mind that despite all the armchair theorizing about Dan Markel’s death, no member of the Adelson family has yet been charged in connection with the murder.

Someone needs to give this guy a penny so he can go buy a clue.

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Most of what has been discussed here for quite some time, were theories that did not in any way involve the A family.
Considering the amount of dogged work LE have invested in this case, they could be wrong, but one can hardly call what the TPD are asserting as baseless speculation, or "armchair theorizing".
imo, speculation.
 
David Lat (author of the Above the Law article) makes my skin crawl. What a journalistic joke. Does he think it will benefit his career if he sucks up to the A's because of their connections somehow? Is he so diluted that he actually believes they are innocent? What is his deal???

Karl Etters, the author of several of the Tallahassee.com articles on the subject, has done an excellent job in my opinion - he reports the facts, and their obvious implications, while keeping the tone neutral and professional.
 
86Violet said:
David Lat (author of the Above the Law article) makes my skin crawl. What a journalistic joke. Does he think it will benefit his career if he sucks up to the A's because of their connections somehow? Is he so diluted that he actually believes they are innocent? What is his deal???
Click to expand...

imho, david lat is not a journalist. he's a gossip blogger like perez hilton (who I love but that's silly celebrity stuff not murder).
a real journalist like karl etters would not post a list of anonymous claims that could be false. that would be seen as unethical.
lat seems to be the PR person for the A family.

but i bet he gets a lot of clicks and makes a lot of money.

this is all IMHO. :happydance:
 
So, the grand jury is convening today, is this correct? I'm sorry for asking what is probably a dumb question since I don't follow as closely as some of you, but what is the purpose? Do we know?
 
86Violet said:
David Lat (author of the Above the Law article) makes my skin crawl. What a journalistic joke. Does he think it will benefit his career if he sucks up to the A's because of their connections somehow? Is he so diluted that he actually believes they are innocent? What is his deal???

Karl Etters, the author of several of the Tallahassee.com articles on the subject, has done an excellent job in my opinion - he reports the facts, and their obvious implications, while keeping the tone neutral and professional.
Click to expand...
Maybe he''s the Crying Man? [emoji4]

Sent from my SM-G386T using Tapatalk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Escambia County John Doe (1989)?

Members online

... and 181 more.
Total: 2,601 (members: 182, guests: 2,419)

Online statistics

Members online
182
Guests online
2,419
Total visitors
2,601
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
600,431
Messages
18,108,658
Members
230,991
Latest member
Clue Keeper
Back
Top