FL - FSU Law Professor Dan Markel Murdered by Hitmen *3 guilty* #15

[Weki]

I’m not sure she is even capable of fear.

She peed her pants when she was arrested though. That came out in her two trials, I believe.

 

[MTW2011]

I understand why Rashbaum is trying to go thru lie by lie but I’m not sure it’s that helpful to his case….

She admits she lied about:
-knew nothing about WA divorce
-didn’t pick $ from CA’s house
-knew nothing of stapled cash
-didn’t bring $ to LR of SG

IMOO, all of those lies back then didn’t make sense - How did KM not know of the stapled cash, how did she not bring the money that LR says she brought them, almost all of her lies seemed implausible in what she “knew nothing” of. Pointing out that the stories are different NOW, in ways that make sense as far as aligning with LR, the State’s case so far, the other “puzzle pieces” seems to me like it only points back towards CA.

 

[Gypsy Road]

She peed her pants when she was arrested though. That came out in her two trials, I believe.

That is true! I forgot about that!

 

[amicuscurie]

So what If Charlie didn’t know about Sig at first. That’s why he asked her if she knew anyone who would do this! What a dumb line of questioning

 

[clearskies1]

I'm relying on this thread for info because I'm finding this way too annoying to listen to.

 

[amicuscurie]

So what If Charlie didn’t know about Sig at first. That’s why he asked her if she knew anyone who would do this! What a dumb line of questioning

So what if he didn’t have a computer! This is getting ridiculous.

 

[cottonweaver]

Georgia needs to explain how the LEO and FBI run their proffer techniques.
Or get Sandford back to explain LE tactics during proffers
Most of jury probably not trial /True Crime followers

 

[amicuscurie]

Why is she trying to explain herself??? Yes or no answers! Just say no! She’s just giving him more to get her on!

 

[cottonweaver]

So what if he didn’t have a computer! This is getting ridiculous.

especially when she already testified to Georgia that Charlie specifically said he printed it off at another dental office & jury would still have been paying attention when she added details about gloves, not licking the envelope seal.

 

[Gypsy Road]

His tone! Why do defense attorney’s have to ask questions using this kind of tone!? What good does it do? It makes me want to tune out.

 

[Weki]

GC should’ve brought up the proffers in her direct and gotten it out that Katie was still minimizing her involvement and why! That would’ve taken the wind out of Raushbaum’s sail. Instead we have to hear this painful tug of war.

 

[Blue Shakehead]

Katie is a train wreck and has virtually nothing new to offer. This is baffling.

 

[amicuscurie]

What is the relevance of this testimony about her relationship with Charlie/Sigfredo? She committed murder because she wanted a more serious relationship?

 

[amicuscurie]

Katie is a train wreck and has virtually nothing new to offer. This is baffling.

She did confirm the whole murder that Charlie hired.

 

[vislaw]

Booyah- HE KNEW HE WAS HIRING A HIT MAN. That stung.

 

[amicuscurie]

Now he’s trying to lay a foundation that the calls between these people on the day of the murder are just, like, routine calls. It’s not the calls, stupid, it’s the sequence!

 

[Weki]

Katie is a train wreck and has virtually nothing new to offer. This is baffling.

I was really hoping she would implicate more Adelsons. She’s a disappointment yet again. Nothing we didn’t already know. She’s not giving us the full picture of how she and Charlie conspired either. Just bare bones - what state has already proven at her trial.

 

[cottonweaver]

Rashbaum just lied to Katie???
Rash just claimed that CA told Lacasse the hit man joke while they were at the Yardbird

Or did I mishear Rash?

 

[Gypsy Road]

What are the odds he “joked” about hiring a hitmam to kill his brother in law and then a hitman is hired, and Dan is dead?

And Katie doesn’t exactly seem like a rocket scientist on the stand who could orchestrate all this and extort CA.

It’s preposterous.

 

[amicuscurie]

Everything he says she automatically and defensively refutes even if it doesn’t matter or even if it helps her.