By all accounts, Zimmerman wasn't completely innocent here. If this truly was a "road rage" incident as is being reported, he is at least responsible for escalating the situation, rather than de-escalating it. If he truly was the target of a "crazed stalker", he should have notified the authorities immediately, before getting shot at.
From what he claims, he was just driving and the guy shot at him.Yes. That true. But what are you trying to say? She is extremely hated. Probably the most hated person in the nation. Yet she doesn't get into these types of altercations. I think the fact that he does points to his mindset.
Apperson is one of the few people on the planet who does not carry a cell phone.
You have a launching pad of about 1 billion people who don't have access to a cell phone. And that doesn't include people like me who spend more time 'looking for my cell phone' than 'carrying my cell phone'.
Yes. That true. But what are you trying to say? She is extremely hated. Probably the most hated person in the nation. Yet she doesn't get into these types of altercations. I think the fact that he does points to his mindset.
#Georgezimmerman attorney says GZ tried making a u-turn to avoid shooter but his window got hit.#fox35 @MyFoxOrlando
Valerie Boey @vboey · 2h 2 hours ago
Police say #Gerogezimmerman never fired his gun, he was the one shot at. #FOX35 @MyFoxOrlando
Valerie Boey @vboey · 4h 4 hours ago
#GeorgeZimmerman attn says police wouldn't allow him into ambulance until he gave them gun.#FOX35 @MyFoxOrlando
I think him having or not having a cell phone has no relevance in the case.
Thanks for these updates, my computer is terrible last few days when I try to follow links. One question I wanted answered is if GZ actually did have a gun with him. From the above it appears GZ did indeed have his gun. With that information I'll put a little more weight on the statement GZ waved his gun. IMO, it's looking like two hot head not wanting to be intimidated by the other.
That is true. However it is also very possible he has become a target by those who want to be the one to bring him down because they didn't like the verdict in the criminal trial or may have other biases against him for one reason or the other.
Unfortunately there are many kooky people in society nowadays who can be quite dangerous.
I have just begun to read about this shooting but GZ did not return fire did he? If not, it seems the dangerous one on the road is the man who fired his weapon at Zimmerman.
IMO
Apperson is one of the few people on the planet who does not carry a cell phone.
That is true. However it is also very possible he has become a target by those who want to be the one to bring him down because they didn't like the verdict in the criminal trial or may have other biases against him for one reason or the other.
Unfortunately there are many kooky people in society nowadays who can be quite dangerous.
I have just begun to read about this shooting but GZ did not return fire did he? If not, it seems the dangerous one on the road is the man who fired his weapon at Zimmerman.
IMO
Ahem, I do not carry a cell phone. I could go on about the why and wherefores, but I shan't.
Wow, blame the victim much?
I don't know who the victim is in this incident, and neither do you.
But "if this truly was a road rage incident as being reported," which is the hypothetical "if" that your statement is based on, GZ was the victim.
Based on those two things, they probably both have some culpability.
I don't understand how it's possible to decide who has culpability, when virtually no facts are known.
We know that Apperson shot at Zimmerman. (I don't think this is in question.)
We don't know who started it. We don't know how it started. We don't know what happened between the time it started and when it ended. We don't know if GZ had a gun. We don't know the details of whatever has happened in the past between Apperson and Zimmerman.
We've got some rumors from some alleged witnesses, and some rumors from a neighbor of Apperson.
Are there are any facts that we know -- any at all -- besides the fact that Apperson shot at Zimmerman?
Am I not allowed to give my opinion??? Because that's all it is, my opinion. If you will notice, I said "probably". Nothing is definite here.
Oh, sure, of course. Everyone gets to have an opinion. People post their opinion and other people comment on it and give their opinion.
You gave your opinion that they both probably have some culpability. In return, I gave my opinion that I don't understand how it's possible to decide who has culpability when so little is known at this point.
It's also my opinion that if someone is the target of a crazed stalker, I blame the stalker, not the target.