Thank you back. All is good.Truth Prevails wrote: "We have nothing about that knock on the door, other than that it occurred. We don't know that it happened at 8:00 pm or 9:00 pm or while Jenn was talking with Rob. We don't know and it's not fair to put that on Rob. "
I agree. What I was saying was a confirmation of how long phone call was (even approximately) and whether knock on door happened during that call (especially!) would be of great benefit in moving case forward in conjunction with timestamps of pings.
Rob is only one that can answer those two questions (not necessarily when knock too place if earlier, but whether it took place during his call). I also understand that infomation has been withheld all these years and that an investigator is really the one who needs these answers, but it's been 12 years and we're the only ones asking questions, so questions need to be taken in that context.
So don't know that we'll get answers, and not putting anything on Rob that he can't answer, but really answers to questions that can be answered are needed to move finding out what happened to Jennifer forward.
Thanks Truth!
I believe it was a morning abduction and the POI was the perpetrator. Whether the POI acted alone is open to question.
IIRC Jennifer was in bed at the time of the 9:57 phone call. It had been a long and tiring day so why would she get out of bed, dress and go out again?
I believe it was a morning abduction and the POI was the perpetrator. Whether the POI acted alone is open to question.
IIRC Jennifer was in bed at the time of the 9:57 phone call. It had been a long and tiring day so why would she get out of bed, dress and go out again?
Have thought about whether Jennifer might have received a phone call on her cell from a co-worker asking her to arrive early for some compelling reason which was maybe meant for her harm. For that reason, the cellphone battery would have been removed to prevent that call from ever being detected.
But both phones stopped working that night ?
But both phones stopped working that night ?
I won't pretend to know as much about the case as you do, but I have to disagree on that one point. I believe she was abducted that night, not the next morning.Thanks for the heads up rd_jfc.
I know no more than anyone else and simply use my own logic based on numerous abductions, homicides and cold cases I have looked at over many years.
I must admit I have swung back and forth like a pendulum between what I consider the two main possibilities in this mystery.
But back to the matter at hand.
That Monday had to be a tiring one for Jennifer. She had driven back to her workplace from Fort Lauderdale and then put in a full day at work.
From what I gather her job was a responsible one and with responsibility there is usually pressure.
Even at only 24 years of age she must have been ready for sleep by 10pm.
So what on earth could have lured her out of her condo at that hour? More so when not far down the road it was not deemed not to be a safe neighbourhood.
Is this what a security conscious person would do?
The above indicates she slept that night and things went bad the next morning. JMHO.
I read an account this weekend that the young man's phone that was left at Jennifer's Condo was his work phone, not his personal phone and that according to the ping pattern for that phone, the battery had gone dead over the weekend. SO many stories have been told which make this puzzle like a moving target. I am trying to assimilate any and all info I can find and see if there is a prevailing theme.
I believe what you read was pure conjecture and shame on the conjecturer for muddying up the water.
I have seen many conjectures that the battery of the other cell phone went dead. That was a flat out WAG made moot by the info given to Kesse. The info was that both phones were disabled around 10:40 pm, not, and I direct this to the source of this stuff, there was something going on with Jennifer's phone and the other phone must have been dead.
Also, there is no such thing as a ping pattern indicating a battery went dead. There could be a cessation of pings, but that happens when phone is turned off. There could be something that the phone sends when battery level reaches a low threshold but I doubt it. That would just use up precious remaining power that might be needed for an emergency, like maybe why the battery has not been recharged. Also there is no such thing as knowing how much power is needed to make one last contact, it depends on close the tower is.
All in all, the source, and I'm sure it wasn't here on WS, is full of crap.
but thanks for making us aware of what's going on with some of these conjectures.
I believe what you read was pure conjecture and shame on the conjecturer for muddying up the water.
I have seen many conjectures that the battery of the other cell phone went dead. That was a flat out WAG made moot by the info given to Kesse. The info was that both phones were disabled around 10:40 pm, not, and I direct this to the source of this stuff, there was something going on with Jennifer's phone and the other phone must have been dead.
Also, there is no such thing as a ping pattern indicating a battery went dead. There could be a cessation of pings, but that happens when phone is turned off. There could be something that the phone sends when battery level reaches a low threshold but I doubt it. That would just use up precious remaining power that might be needed for an emergency, like maybe why the battery has not been recharged. Also there is no such thing as knowing how much power is needed to make one last contact, it depends on close the tower is.
All in all, the source, and I'm sure it wasn't here on WS, is full of crap.
but thanks for making us aware of what's going on with some of these conjectures.