magpie
Derek's Grandma
http://www.news4jax.com/news/watch-michael-dunn-trial/-/475880/23432654/-/1chosjz/-/index.html
Chatter in courtroom and the CLOCK is up...
Chatter in courtroom and the CLOCK is up...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dinner was already delivered awhile ago per an earlier tweet.
Did WAT live stream quit?
Thank you, Ticya. This answered some of my questions and relieved my worry that his instructions could have led to a mistrial or grounds for appeal.
How is knowing if a mistrial will be declared going to help the jurors decide guilt or innocence? That is their only job.
http://www.news4jax.com/news/watch-michael-dunn-trial/-/475880/23432654/-/1chosjz/-/index.html
Chatter in courtroom and the CLOCK is up...
It isn't working for me. I went to http://new.livestream.com/accounts/4903803/events/2749073
UGH Zimmerman is going to be interviewed monday morn on CNN
:facepalm: Smart of them to advertise that NOW.[/QUOTE
confirms that msm will keep these cases whipped up to play on the viewer's emotions, other wise why play GZ interview? this is foul as hell. what are they implying? if Dunn gets off he and GZ can open a kill and free club. anger here. jmo
They will do any thing for ratings :banghead:
You would CHANGE your mind based on not on evidence put forth in the trial, but on a possible mistrial?If I planned on not making a compromised verdict on one count (so a mistrial on it) but thought that he could have another chance at what we were unanimous on if no compromise, I'd change my mind.
For me, though, I'd compromise anyway on that count. M2 is better than a later chance at NG. That's another reason I think they might have a person voting NG on the murder counts.
But we have folks here who say they wouldn't compromise past M1, so it really could be that.
oh no....per NG? they might be hung up on all the charges pertaining to Jordan?
That's what it appears to say. We tell jurors what they "can't" do (outside research, etc), but specifically telling them to go around and state the weakness of their own positions seems to me to create fodder for those on the other side. And the part about "no interrupting"? Ha! What if one juror has said the same thing 50 times in 4 days, and repeats it again? Everyone would have to sit there and listen to it again. I dunno. As I said, IANAFL, but this feels awfully strange to me.
How is knowing if a mistrial will be declared going to help the jurors decide guilt or innocence? That is their only job.
I just read my own state's Allen Charge and it goes even farther than the FL one as far as telling jurors how to go back and attempt to come to unanimous decision and reexamine their own views
You would compromise not based on any evidence put forth in the trial?
I must be mistaken, because I thought that their entire decision was to be based on.
I don't understand why so many of you think the jury is debating only guilty vs not guilty on count 1. It's possible they ALL think he is guilty of murder, but just disagree as to the degree. 7 might think it was premeditated and 5 might think it was not. I think they all know he murdered Jordan Davis, but are unable to agree on the level of the murder. Does that make sense?
No, I am saying they could all think he is guilty they just cannot agree on the level of murder.
Because of Jury question #8 from earlier today. They specifically asked about self defense for each person in the car. Unfortunately, that tells me they believe Dunn about JD threatening him, yet the others did not.I believe that is true. I believe they can not decide between Premeditated and second degree.. That is all. I don't believe they think he is not guilty at all.
You really believe if it was a car full of white grannies blasting Air Supply ........