Analyze This
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2011
- Messages
- 282
- Reaction score
- 0
This is a discussion forum where we state our opinions based on the information that has been made available to us via the media and other sleuthing that we have done on named suspects. This is not a trial by jury and therefore we do not require a LE representative to stand up in front of a camera to state that Dale Smith lied to them in order to form an OPINION of what we believe has transpired since the day that Michelle went missing and why he has been named the prime suspect.
We are not going to get any evidential information from LE, including what witnesses have stated to them. The public never does until after an arrest has been made and even that is only in rare cases such as the ones in Florida where the Sunshine Law requires that the information be released. So it is not expected that we will hear about anything that LE has used to place the suspect tag on DSJr until such time as an arrest has been made. That's what is meant by LE holding things "close to the vest". They never...ever...give out evidentiary information during the course of an investigation until they absolutely have to in the event of an arrest, due to the Sunshine Laws, or in discovery to the defence in other cases. And even in those cases it's unlikely that we will hear any of the evidence until it goes to trial. There is not one case on this site that I'm aware of, where you will ever hear of LE stating why someone has been named a suspect and where they will list what evidence they have in order to make that statement.
The victim's sister, in this case, has gone on camera to state that DSJr told the family that Michelle showed up at the condo around 4pm to drop off the children and that she stayed about 10 minutes and left. And that he left right after her. Logic and common sense would indicate that he also told this version of the events of that day to LE. Unfortunately that's all we have to go on when discussing these cases. The information that is made available by person's other than LE and then plain old logic as to what may have transpired. So the version that she showed up around 4pm to drop off the children is what we were all going by at the beginning of this case. Her last known siting was listed as approx 4:15pm on the crimeline site. I believe it may still be listed as such. Because that's the information that everyone had. Until the day that video was released in the media. And then it became apparent that something was wrong with that timeline. Because the video showed her arriving much earlier. And it appears that the very next day, DSJr was brought in and asked to take a lie detector test. Which he refused and then he stopped "co-operating" with LE and got himself a lawyer. It was at that point that he was named a suspect, not a POI but the PRIME SUSPECT. Because LE had been collecting evidence for over a week and his version of events was obviously not adding up to the evidence they were collecting. LE are not going to tell us why they named him a suspect, logic and common sense for some people helped to form an OPINION of what that reason may be.
MOO
I misunderstood what Jazzmaster was saying in the post that I responded to. My impression was that law enforcement had stated that DS II made "inconsistent statements". I didn't realize that the entire post was opinion. Thanks for pointing out that it was the opinion of the poster.
It requires no effort to understand why DS II is considered a suspect. It is common sense. Unfortunately, Michelle is still missing and no one is being held accountable for it.