But Thor, I haven't seen Michelle's family "demonizing" Dale or attacking him. Have you? Where?
I saw that they want questions answered. Or is that what you mean?
http://m.wesh.com/news/Michelle-Par...ith/-/15560370/19263408/-/kxe6su/-/index.html
First sorry again for misunderstanding your question previously, no if you read my posts in their entirety part of it are general characterizations of situations, specifically so that I don't talk directly about the family and to be left intentionally vague, because I don't want to be accused of this and that.
However,
since you asked, I'm going to elaborate more specifically where the family is the issue you've brought up front and center.
First I was referring to was in terms of
strategy, while I understand the emotional and human part of it all, and I've made that abundantly clear many times before, and second it was in reference to those kids who are constantly brought up in conversation here, from that point of view alone, I do think that the family, at least by know and under existing circumstances,
where those two children are concerned, should try to build bridges not burn them, and what I mean by that is to try to establish a dialogue with DS where the goal is to reunite the family in some fashion as to afford those children a connection to the people they also love and to see to it that this tragedy is not even more so for those children that it already is.
It's certainly not by televised accusations, from murder to being at fault for problems of visitations, lawsuits and such this two families are going to come together for the benefits of those children, and no matter which side of this debate one might be, I think that is self evident; People don't accomplish much in relationship to one another under those circumstances.
Now, at some point, assuming DS is not charged with a crime, and since he's the custodial parent, then
if the issue is the welfare of the kids, then an effort must be made by both sides to do away with the hostility and do what's right for the children. Of course, if the point is to accuse and to seek
answers (as you put it) I fear that perhaps after two years there's little to hope in terms of DS saying anymore than he already has much less being forced to say more, and perhaps he actually had nothing to do with Michelle's disappearance, but whatever the case might be, one can be sure that if the police can charge DS
the surely will, and I wonder about a
strategy on the part of the family that does not include some sort of mechanism that is intended to achieve the goal of reuniting those twins with their maternal grandparents with meaningful visitations by
cooperation with DS,
not in spite of him, and cannot include "
it's all your fault" or
"you're a murderer" but by taking difficult steps of cooperation on
both sides which the sad current state of affairs are clearly not an indication of it by any stretch of the imagination.
Again that is if the welfare of those children is the issue.
JMO