Good morning everyone. (As usual) I have a theory I would like to share. I hope it does not offend anyone, and if I disappear from here, I'd like to say it's been nice knowing all of you and keep on sleuthing, etc... Apologize in advance if the post is too long, I am thinking congruently and not judgmentally.
DRUG RELATED CRIME
It has been posted before and/or speculated on that DT was a public proponent of a certain drug that is now, BTW, socially acceptable by a lot of people and is legal for medical use in some states.
It has been posted before and/or speculated on that SP may have been a user of various substances, which he states he was before becoming the Indigo healer.
We know that CPC is a fan of *advertiser censored* and statistics would probably show that *advertiser censored* fans are also fans or users of some substances.
It has been posted before that the lapse of time before LE was contacted (she did not call 911) (they happened to be passing by when flagged down) could have been to rid the house of substances that would be found by LE as a matter of the investigation. I have always wondered, if LE had not passed by, would she have called 911, and when?
ALL OF MY RESEARCH into child homicide investigations reveals that in the initial phases the police will scour the home and will interview persons with the subject of substances being a large part of the scenarioi/investigation. LE ALWAYS treats a missing child as a potential homicide. Any missing child is automatically a possibly abused/maltreated/neglected child. LE will thoroughly investigate the home and look for signs of maltreatment or abuse, also looking at the other children and interviewing them. I will try to find another post on protocol for missing child investigation to bring fresh perspective to everyone.
Any illegal substances had to have been purchased by a seller. Whether seller was a friend, acquaintenance or bad guy, past or present. LE's drug investigation detectives are familiar with the scene, past and present, and they have informants.
DRUG THEORY....DT/CPC/SP, etc., are buying/using whatever drugs and have them in the home.
DT texts SP and he tells her Somer has not returned home. She gets that "strange feeling that something is wrong this time" and for whatever reason, it dawns on them that LE has to be brought in this time. Either DT tells SP to flush the drugs or he decides to do it on his own. SP sends AT and ST out to search and begins nervously getting rid of substances. He isn't done when AT comes back so he sends her out again. DT calls CPC and tells him to come out and help her search (the drugs are flushed). Enough time has elapsed, DT sees LE and flags them down, etc. Does DT have any suspicions of who has done this - a retribution thing? More on that later.
LE on the scene, follows protocol, searches house. Takes MPR. Interviews everyone.
Forward to pressers and interviews. "you're not in trouble" "please, anyone if you have her, drop her off on a corner, anywhere". Subsequently Sheriff B saying they have looked at all of the RSO's and there is no change in DT's facial expression. Subsequent interviews have her speaking about Somer as if she was deceased. She begins referring to the perp as "...."he"....or "it could have been"....and changes to "it" and "this animal"...and makes a personal statement..."you're going to pay for a long, long, time". "Who would kill my baby and put her in the trash," and goes on about putting her in the trash as if that was the biggest thing in her thought process. She never said something like, "How could you molest a sweet little girl". I don't recall DT ever saying that "it" was a "pervert" or any other term that would indicate she thought it was a sex crime. She also never said, "we have to find him before he gets another child," did she? What would you tell other parents about their children? "I would say, tell them that you love them...never be too busy..." NOT "There are bad, perverted people out there...make sure your child is never vulnerable to being grabbed by a predator"...
Now, it's been stated that many parents need to view the remains of their child for closure. What this means is, some parents cannot come to grips with the fact that the child is really gone, and they have to see it to believe it. DT, according to some, was strongly encouraged NOT to view Somer, and according to others, was DENIED the right to see Somer. The same is true for knowing COD. We have read that it is the next-of-kin's right to obtain that information, but DT, for whatever reason, is not allowed to know. Releasing it may interfere with criminal investigation.
So, if DT was using drugs, or it was CPC, and there were drugs being purchased, and drug dealers can be nasty people, the above makes sense. Because if you had a strong suspicion that a person had killed your daughter, and this person may have been a bad guy drug dealer, you would:
1. Get rid of the drugs and/or warn the others of this possibility
2. Be out of your mind with grief wondering what happened to your child, but also be aware that if what you think may have happened, you are going to get dragged into it big time. If it's found out you're using, you will be a suspect.
3. Have no trouble accepting the reality that it happened
4. Go on TV and warn the killer that "we're comin' to get you" and make other "personal" statements to the killer
5. Deal with your rage by going on TV and defending yourself against anything that may point to you as putting your child in harm's way. Because letting your seven year old walk home - even if she was a little flighty - is not a big deal. You never dreamed that she would be grabbed in broad daylight by _______________ a drug dealer? Who would imagine that?
6. Change MySpace pictures that may cause you to look like a bad mother
7. Keep your significant other out of the public eye (interviews, etc) because to be honest, he looks just like a bad guy and may also slip up and say something wrong or give the wrong impression, etc.
8. Feel remorse and guilt and say "I feel like it's my fault".
9. Obtain a lawyer who will at least initially protect you from yourself, from inadvertently saying anything incriminating or giving a wrong impression.
10. You would not argue with LE about viewing her body or getting autopsy results because you want to remain friendly with LE and also being faced with the reality would be devastating to you.
Why would a drug dealer or a drug accomplice kill Somer? I don't know. But viewing the body or releasing COD and DT's history of talking, talking, talking could put the possibility that she would leak information to a perp who is involved in the drug scene. IMO MOO ETC ETC
